base.v 53.6 KB
Newer Older
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2017, Coq-std++ developers. *)
2 3 4 5 6
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects type class interfaces, notations, and general theorems
that are used throughout the whole development. Most importantly it contains
abstract interfaces for ordered structures, collections, and various other data
structures. *)
7

8
From Coq Require Export Morphisms RelationClasses List Bool Utf8 Setoid.
9
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
10 11
Export ListNotations.
From Coq.Program Require Export Basics Syntax.
12

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
13 14
(** * Enable implicit generalization. *)
(** This option enables implicit generalization in arguments of the form
15 16 17 18 19 20
   `{...} (i.e., anonymous arguments).  Unfortunately, it also enables
   implicit generalization in `Instance`.  We think that the fact taht both
   behaviors are coupled together is a [bug in
   Coq](https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/6030). *)
Global Generalizable All Variables.

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
(** * Tweak program *)
(** 1. Since we only use Program to solve logical side-conditions, they should
always be made Opaque, otherwise we end up with performance problems due to
Coq blindly unfolding them.

Note that in most cases we use [Next Obligation. (* ... *) Qed.], for which
this option does not matter. However, sometimes we write things like
[Solve Obligations with naive_solver (* ... *)], and then the obligations
should surely be opaque. *)
Global Unset Transparent Obligations.

(** 2. Do not let Program automatically simplify obligations. The default
obligation tactic is [Tactics.program_simpl], which, among other things,
introduces all variables and gives them fresh names. As such, it becomes
impossible to refer to hypotheses in a robust way. *)
36
Obligation Tactic := idtac.
37 38

(** 3. Hide obligations from the results of the [Search] commands. *)
39
Add Search Blacklist "_obligation_".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
40

41
(** * Sealing off definitions *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
42 43 44 45
Section seal.
  Local Set Primitive Projections.
  Record seal {A} (f : A) := { unseal : A; seal_eq : unseal = f }.
End seal.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
46 47
Arguments unseal {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments seal_eq {_ _} _ : assert.
48

49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
(** * Non-backtracking type classes *)
(** The type class [NoBackTrack P] can be used to establish [P] without ever
backtracking on the instance of [P] that has been found. Backtracking may
normally happen when [P] contains evars that could be instanciated in different
ways depending on which instance is picked, and type class search somewhere else
depends on this evar.

The proper way of handling this would be by setting Coq's option
`Typeclasses Unique Instances`. However, this option seems to be broken, see Coq
issue #6714.

See https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/FP/iris-coq/merge_requests/112 for a rationale
of this type class. *)
Class NoBackTrack (P : Prop) := { no_backtrack : P }.
Hint Extern 0 (NoBackTrack _) => constructor; apply _ : typeclass_instances.

65 66 67 68
(* A conditional at the type class level. Note that [TCIf P Q R] is not the same
as [TCOr (TCAnd P Q) R]: the latter will backtrack to [R] if it fails to
establish [R], i.e. does not have the behavior of a conditional. Furthermore,
note that [TCOr (TCAnd P Q) (TCAnd (TCNot P) R)] would not work; we generally
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
would not be able to prove the negation of [P]. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
70
Inductive TCIf (P Q R : Prop) : Prop :=
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
  | TCIf_true : P  Q  TCIf P Q R
  | TCIf_false : R  TCIf P Q R.
Existing Class TCIf.

Hint Extern 0 (TCIf _ _ _) =>
  first [apply TCIf_true; [apply _|]
        |apply TCIf_false] : typeclass_instances.

79
(** * Typeclass opaque definitions *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
80
(** The constant [tc_opaque] is used to make definitions opaque for just type
81 82 83 84 85
class search. Note that [simpl] is set up to always unfold [tc_opaque]. *)
Definition tc_opaque {A} (x : A) : A := x.
Typeclasses Opaque tc_opaque.
Arguments tc_opaque {_} _ /.

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
86
(** Below we define type class versions of the common logical operators. It is
87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
important to note that we duplicate the definitions, and do not declare the
existing logical operators as type classes. That is, we do not say:

  Existing Class or.
  Existing Class and.

If we could define the existing logical operators as classes, there is no way
of disambiguating whether a premise of a lemma should be solved by type class
resolution or not.

These classes are useful for two purposes: writing complicated type class
premises in a more concise way, and for efficiency. For example, using the [Or]
class, instead of defining two instances [P → Q1 → R] and [P → Q2 → R] we could
have one instance [P → Or Q1 Q2 → R]. When we declare the instance that way, we
avoid the need to derive [P] twice. *)
102
Inductive TCOr (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop :=
103 104 105 106 107
  | TCOr_l : P1  TCOr P1 P2
  | TCOr_r : P2  TCOr P1 P2.
Existing Class TCOr.
Existing Instance TCOr_l | 9.
Existing Instance TCOr_r | 10.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108

109
Inductive TCAnd (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop := TCAnd_intro : P1  P2  TCAnd P1 P2.
110 111
Existing Class TCAnd.
Existing Instance TCAnd_intro.
112

113 114 115
Inductive TCTrue : Prop := TCTrue_intro : TCTrue.
Existing Class TCTrue.
Existing Instance TCTrue_intro.
116

117 118 119 120 121 122 123
Inductive TCForall {A} (P : A  Prop) : list A  Prop :=
  | TCForall_nil : TCForall P []
  | TCForall_cons x xs : P x  TCForall P xs  TCForall P (x :: xs).
Existing Class TCForall.
Existing Instance TCForall_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall_cons.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131
Inductive TCForall2 {A B} (P : A  B  Prop) : list A  list B  Prop :=
  | TCForall2_nil : TCForall2 P [] []
  | TCForall2_cons x y xs ys :
     P x y  TCForall2 P xs ys  TCForall2 P (x :: xs) (y :: ys).
Existing Class TCForall2.
Existing Instance TCForall2_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall2_cons.

132 133 134 135
Inductive TCEq {A} (x : A) : A  Prop := TCEq_refl : TCEq x x.
Existing Class TCEq.
Existing Instance TCEq_refl.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
136 137 138 139 140
Inductive TCDiag {A} (C : A  Prop) : A  A  Prop :=
  | TCDiag_diag x : C x  TCDiag C x x.
Existing Class TCDiag.
Existing Instance TCDiag_diag.

141
(** Throughout this development we use [stdpp_scope] for all general purpose
142
notations that do not belong to a more specific scope. *)
143 144
Delimit Scope stdpp_scope with stdpp.
Global Open Scope stdpp_scope.
145

146
(** Change [True] and [False] into notations in order to enable overloading.
147 148
We will use this to give [True] and [False] a different interpretation for
embedded logics. *)
149 150
Notation "'True'" := True (format "True") : type_scope.
Notation "'False'" := False (format "False") : type_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
151 152


153
(** * Equality *)
154
(** Introduce some Haskell style like notations. *)
155 156 157 158 159 160
Notation "(=)" := eq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x =)" := (eq x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(= x )" := (λ y, eq y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠)" := (λ x y, x  y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ≠)" := (λ y, x  y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠ x )" := (λ y, y  x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
161

162 163 164 165
Infix "=@{ A }" := (@eq A)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(=@{ A } )" := (@eq A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X =@{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
166 167
Notation "X ≠@{ A } Y":= (¬X =@{ A } Y)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
168

Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
169 170
Hint Extern 0 (_ = _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 100 (_  _) => discriminate : core.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
171

172
Instance:  A, PreOrder (=@{A}).
173 174 175
Proof. split; repeat intro; congruence. Qed.

(** ** Setoid equality *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
176 177 178
(** We define an operational type class for setoid equality, i.e., the
"canonical" equivalence for a type. The typeclass is tied to the \equiv
symbol. This is based on (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011). *)
179
Class Equiv A := equiv: relation A.
180 181 182
(* No Hint Mode set because of Coq bug #5735
Hint Mode Equiv ! : typeclass_instances. *)

183
Infix "≡" := equiv (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
184 185 186
Infix "≡@{ A }" := (@equiv A _)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.

187 188 189 190 191 192 193
Notation "(≡)" := equiv (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≡)" := (equiv X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≡ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢)" := (λ X Y, ¬X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≢ Y":= (¬X  Y) (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≢)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
194

195 196
Notation "(≡@{ A } )" := (@equiv A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X @{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
197 198
Notation "X ≢@{ A } Y":= (¬X @{ A } Y)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
199

200 201 202 203 204
(** The type class [LeibnizEquiv] collects setoid equalities that coincide
with Leibniz equality. We provide the tactic [fold_leibniz] to transform such
setoid equalities into Leibniz equalities, and [unfold_leibniz] for the
reverse. *)
Class LeibnizEquiv A `{Equiv A} := leibniz_equiv x y : x  y  x = y.
205 206
Hint Mode LeibnizEquiv ! - : typeclass_instances.

207
Lemma leibniz_equiv_iff `{LeibnizEquiv A, !Reflexive (@{A})} (x y : A) :
208 209
  x  y  x = y.
Proof. split. apply leibniz_equiv. intros ->; reflexivity. Qed.
210

211 212
Ltac fold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
213
  | H : context [ _ @{?A} _ ] |- _ =>
214
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
215
  | |- context [ _ @{?A} _ ] =>
216 217 218 219
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.
Ltac unfold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
220
  | H : context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] |- _ =>
221
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
222
  | |- context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] =>
223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.

Definition equivL {A} : Equiv A := (=).

(** A [Params f n] instance forces the setoid rewriting mechanism not to
rewrite in the first [n] arguments of the function [f]. We will declare such
instances for all operational type classes in this development. *)
Instance: Params (@equiv) 2.

(** The following instance forces [setoid_replace] to use setoid equality
(for types that have an [Equiv] instance) rather than the standard Leibniz
equality. *)
Instance equiv_default_relation `{Equiv A} : DefaultRelation () | 3.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
237 238
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption : core.
239 240 241 242 243


(** * Type classes *)
(** ** Decidable propositions *)
(** This type class by (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011) collects decidable
244
propositions. *)
245
Class Decision (P : Prop) := decide : {P} + {¬P}.
246
Hint Mode Decision ! : typeclass_instances.
247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266
Arguments decide _ {_} : simpl never, assert.

(** Although [RelDecision R] is just [∀ x y, Decision (R x y)], we make this
an explicit class instead of a notation for two reasons:

- It allows us to control [Hint Mode] more precisely. In particular, if it were
  defined as a notation, the above [Hint Mode] for [Decision] would not prevent
  diverging instance search when looking for [RelDecision (@eq ?A)], which would
  result in it looking for [Decision (@eq ?A x y)], i.e. an instance where the
  head position of [Decision] is not en evar.
- We use it to avoid inefficient computation due to eager evaluation of
  propositions by [vm_compute]. This inefficiency arises for example if
  [(x = y) := (f x = f y)]. Since [decide (x = y)] evaluates to
  [decide (f x = f y)], this would then lead to evaluation of [f x] and [f y].
  Using the [RelDecision], the [f] is hidden under a lambda, which prevents
  unnecessary evaluation. *)
Class RelDecision {A B} (R : A  B  Prop) :=
  decide_rel x y :> Decision (R x y).
Hint Mode RelDecision ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Arguments decide_rel {_ _} _ {_} _ _ : simpl never, assert.
267
Notation EqDecision A := (RelDecision (=@{A})).
268 269 270 271

(** ** Inhabited types *)
(** This type class collects types that are inhabited. *)
Class Inhabited (A : Type) : Type := populate { inhabitant : A }.
272
Hint Mode Inhabited ! : typeclass_instances.
273
Arguments populate {_} _ : assert.
274 275 276 277 278 279

(** ** Proof irrelevant types *)
(** This type class collects types that are proof irrelevant. That means, all
elements of the type are equal. We use this notion only used for propositions,
but by universe polymorphism we can generalize it. *)
Class ProofIrrel (A : Type) : Prop := proof_irrel (x y : A) : x = y.
280
Hint Mode ProofIrrel ! : typeclass_instances.
281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316

(** ** Common properties *)
(** These operational type classes allow us to refer to common mathematical
properties in a generic way. For example, for injectivity of [(k ++)] it
allows us to write [inj (k ++)] instead of [app_inv_head k]. *)
Class Inj {A B} (R : relation A) (S : relation B) (f : A  B) : Prop :=
  inj x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Class Inj2 {A B C} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B)
    (S : relation C) (f : A  B  C) : Prop :=
  inj2 x1 x2 y1 y2 : S (f x1 x2) (f y1 y2)  R1 x1 y1  R2 x2 y2.
Class Cancel {A B} (S : relation B) (f : A  B) (g : B  A) : Prop :=
  cancel :  x, S (f (g x)) x.
Class Surj {A B} (R : relation B) (f : A  B) :=
  surj y :  x, R (f x) y.
Class IdemP {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  idemp x : R (f x x) x.
Class Comm {A B} (R : relation A) (f : B  B  A) : Prop :=
  comm x y : R (f x y) (f y x).
Class LeftId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_id x : R (f i x) x.
Class RightId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_id x : R (f x i) x.
Class Assoc {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  assoc x y z : R (f x (f y z)) (f (f x y) z).
Class LeftAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_absorb x : R (f i x) i.
Class RightAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_absorb x : R (f x i) i.
Class AntiSymm {A} (R S : relation A) : Prop :=
  anti_symm x y : S x y  S y x  R x y.
Class Total {A} (R : relation A) := total x y : R x y  R y x.
Class Trichotomy {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomy x y : R x y  x = y  R y x.
Class TrichotomyT {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomyT x y : {R x y} + {x = y} + {R y x}.

317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332
Arguments irreflexivity {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj {_ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj2 {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ _: assert.
Arguments cancel {_ _ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments surj {_ _ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments idemp {_ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments comm {_ _ _} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments assoc {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments anti_symm {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments total {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomy {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomyT {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396

Lemma not_symmetry `{R : relation A, !Symmetric R} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma symmetry_iff `(R : relation A) `{!Symmetric R} x y : R x y  R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.

Lemma not_inj `{Inj A B R R' f} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R' (f x) (f y).
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_1 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R x1 x2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_2 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R' y1 y2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR' HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.

Lemma inj_iff {A B} {R : relation A} {S : relation B} (f : A  B)
  `{!Inj R S f} `{!Proper (R ==> S) f} x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_1 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} y : Inj R1 R3 (λ x, f x y).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_2 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} x : Inj R2 R3 (f x).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.

Lemma cancel_inj `{Cancel A B R1 f g, !Equivalence R1, !Proper (R2 ==> R1) f} :
  Inj R1 R2 g.
Proof.
  intros x y E. rewrite <-(cancel f g x), <-(cancel f g y), E. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma cancel_surj `{Cancel A B R1 f g} : Surj R1 f.
Proof. intros y. exists (g y). auto. Qed.

(** The following lemmas are specific versions of the projections of the above
type classes for Leibniz equality. These lemmas allow us to enforce Coq not to
use the setoid rewriting mechanism. *)
Lemma idemp_L {A} f `{!@IdemP A (=) f} x : f x x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma comm_L {A B} f `{!@Comm A B (=) f} x y : f x y = f y x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_id_L {A} i f `{!@LeftId A (=) i f} x : f i x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_id_L {A} i f `{!@RightId A (=) i f} x : f x i = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma assoc_L {A} f `{!@Assoc A (=) f} x y z : f x (f y z) = f (f x y) z.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@LeftAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f i x = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@RightAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f x i = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.

(** ** Generic orders *)
(** The classes [PreOrder], [PartialOrder], and [TotalOrder] use an arbitrary
relation [R] instead of [⊆] to support multiple orders on the same type. *)
Definition strict {A} (R : relation A) : relation A := λ X Y, R X Y  ¬R Y X.
Instance: Params (@strict) 2.
Class PartialOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  partial_order_pre :> PreOrder R;
  partial_order_anti_symm :> AntiSymm (=) R
}.
Class TotalOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  total_order_partial :> PartialOrder R;
  total_order_trichotomy :> Trichotomy (strict R)
}.

(** * Logic *)
397 398 399
Notation "(∧)" := and (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∧)" := (and A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∧ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
400

401 402 403
Notation "(∨)" := or (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∨)" := (or A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∨ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
404

405 406 407
Notation "(↔)" := iff (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ↔)" := (iff A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(↔ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
408

Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
409 410
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption : core.
411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421

Lemma or_l P Q : ¬Q  P  Q  P.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma or_r P Q : ¬P  P  Q  Q.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_l (P Q : Prop) : (Q  P)  Q  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_r (P Q : Prop) : P  (P  Q)  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma impl_transitive (P Q R : Prop) : (P  Q)  (Q  R)  (P  R).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
422 423 424 425 426 427
Lemma forall_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Lemma exist_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
428

429
Instance: Comm () (=@{A}).
430
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
431
Instance: Comm () (λ x y, y =@{A} x).
432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.


(** * Common data types *)
(** ** Functions *)
471 472 473
Notation "(→)" := (λ A B, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A →)" := (λ B, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(→ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
474

475
Notation "t $ r" := (t r)
476 477 478
  (at level 65, right associativity, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($)" := (λ f x, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($ x )" := (λ f, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
479

480 481 482 483
Infix "∘" := compose : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘)" := compose (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( f ∘)" := (compose f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘ f )" := (λ g, compose g f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
484

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
485 486 487
Instance impl_inhabited {A} `{Inhabited B} : Inhabited (A  B) :=
  populate (λ _, inhabitant).

488 489
(** Ensure that [simpl] unfolds [id], [compose], and [flip] when fully
applied. *)
490 491 492 493
Arguments id _ _ / : assert.
Arguments compose _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments flip _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments const _ _ _ _ / : assert.
494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541
Typeclasses Transparent id compose flip const.

Definition fun_map {A A' B B'} (f: A'  A) (g: B  B') (h : A  B) : A'  B' :=
  g  h  f.

Instance const_proper `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B} (x : B) :
  Reflexive R2  Proper (R1 ==> R2) (λ _, x).
Proof. intros ? y1 y2; reflexivity. Qed.

Instance id_inj {A} : Inj (=) (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros ??; auto. Qed.
Instance compose_inj {A B C} R1 R2 R3 (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Inj R1 R2 f  Inj R2 R3 g  Inj R1 R3 (g  f).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.

Instance id_surj {A} : Surj (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros y; exists y; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance compose_surj {A B C} R (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Surj (=) f  Surj R g  Surj R (g  f).
Proof.
  intros ?? x. unfold compose. destruct (surj g x) as [y ?].
  destruct (surj f y) as [z ?]. exists z. congruence.
Qed.

Instance id_comm {A B} (x : B) : Comm (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance id_assoc {A} (x : A) : Assoc (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.

(** ** Lists *)
Instance list_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (list A) := populate [].

Definition zip_with {A B C} (f : A  B  C) : list A  list B  list C :=
  fix go l1 l2 :=
  match l1, l2 with x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 => f x1 x2 :: go l1 l2 | _ , _ => [] end.
Notation zip := (zip_with pair).

(** ** Booleans *)
(** The following coercion allows us to use Booleans as propositions. *)
Coercion Is_true : bool >-> Sortclass.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
542 543 544
Hint Unfold Is_true : core.
Hint Immediate Is_true_eq_left : core.
Hint Resolve orb_prop_intro andb_prop_intro : core.
545 546 547 548 549 550
Notation "(&&)" := andb (only parsing).
Notation "(||)" := orb (only parsing).
Infix "&&*" := (zip_with (&&)) (at level 40).
Infix "||*" := (zip_with (||)) (at level 50).

Instance bool_inhabated : Inhabited bool := populate true.
551

552 553 554 555 556
Definition bool_le (β1 β2 : bool) : Prop := negb β1 || β2.
Infix "=.>" := bool_le (at level 70).
Infix "=.>*" := (Forall2 bool_le) (at level 70).
Instance: PartialOrder bool_le.
Proof. repeat split; repeat intros [|]; compute; tauto. Qed.
557

558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565
Lemma andb_True b1 b2 : b1 && b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma orb_True b1 b2 : b1 || b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma negb_True b : negb b  ¬b.
Proof. destruct b; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma Is_true_false (b : bool) : b = false  ¬b.
Proof. now intros -> ?. Qed.
566

567 568
(** ** Unit *)
Instance unit_equiv : Equiv unit := λ _ _, True.
569
Instance unit_equivalence : Equivalence (@{unit}).
570
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
571 572
Instance unit_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv unit.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
573
Instance unit_inhabited: Inhabited unit := populate ().
574

575
(** ** Products *)
576 577
Notation "( x ,)" := (pair x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(, y )" := (λ x, (x,y)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
578

579 580
Notation "p .1" := (fst p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .1").
Notation "p .2" := (snd p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .2").
581

582
Instance: Params (@pair) 2.
583 584
Instance: Params (@fst) 2.
Instance: Params (@snd) 2.
585

586 587 588 589 590 591 592
Notation curry := prod_curry.
Notation uncurry := prod_uncurry.
Definition curry3 {A B C D} (f : A  B  C  D) (p : A * B * C) : D :=
  let '(a,b,c) := p in f a b c.
Definition curry4 {A B C D E} (f : A  B  C  D  E) (p : A * B * C * D) : E :=
  let '(a,b,c,d) := p in f a b c d.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
593 594 595 596 597
Definition uncurry3 {A B C D} (f : A * B * C  D) (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) : D :=
  f (a, b, c).
Definition uncurry4 {A B C D E} (f : A * B * C * D  E)
  (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) (d : D) : E := f (a, b, c, d).

598 599
Definition prod_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (p : A * B) : A' * B' :=
  (f (p.1), g (p.2)).
600
Arguments prod_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
601

602 603
Definition prod_zip {A A' A'' B B' B''} (f : A  A'  A'') (g : B  B'  B'')
    (p : A * B) (q : A' * B') : A'' * B'' := (f (p.1) (q.1), g (p.2) (q.2)).
604
Arguments prod_zip {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ _ !_ !_ / : assert.
605

606 607 608
Instance prod_inhabited {A B} (iA : Inhabited A)
    (iB : Inhabited B) : Inhabited (A * B) :=
  match iA, iB with populate x, populate y => populate (x,y) end.
609

610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617
Instance pair_inj : Inj2 (=) (=) (=) (@pair A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance prod_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (prod_map f g).
Proof.
  intros ?? [??] [??] ?; simpl in *; f_equal;
    [apply (inj f)|apply (inj g)]; congruence.
Qed.
618

619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634
Definition prod_relation {A B} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) :
  relation (A * B) := λ x y, R1 (x.1) (y.1)  R2 (x.2) (y.2).
Section prod_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance prod_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
635

636 637
  Global Instance pair_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> R2 ==> prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
638 639
  Global Instance pair_inj' : Inj2 R1 R2 (prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; eauto. Qed.
640 641 642 643 644
  Global Instance fst_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R1) fst.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance snd_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R2) snd.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
End prod_relation.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
645

646 647
Instance prod_equiv `{Equiv A,Equiv B} : Equiv (A * B) := prod_relation () ().
Instance pair_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} :
648 649
  Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@pair A B) := _.
Instance pair_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj2 () () () (@pair A B) := _.
650 651 652
Instance fst_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@fst A B) := _.
Instance snd_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@snd A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque prod_equiv.
653

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
654 655
Instance prod_leibniz `{LeibnizEquiv A, LeibnizEquiv B} : LeibnizEquiv (A * B).
Proof. intros [??] [??] [??]; f_equal; apply leibniz_equiv; auto. Qed.
656

657
(** ** Sums *)
658 659
Definition sum_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (xy : A + B) : A' + B' :=
  match xy with inl x => inl (f x) | inr y => inr (g y) end.
660
Arguments sum_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
661

662
Instance sum_inhabited_l {A B} (iA : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
663
  match iA with populate x => populate (inl x) end.
664
Instance sum_inhabited_r {A B} (iB : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
665
  match iB with populate y => populate (inl y) end.
666

667 668 669 670
Instance inl_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inl A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance inr_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inr A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
671

672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698
Instance sum_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (sum_map f g).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?] [?|?] [=]; f_equal; apply (inj _); auto. Qed.

Inductive sum_relation {A B}
     (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) : relation (A + B) :=
  | inl_related x1 x2 : R1 x1 x2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inl x1) (inl x2)
  | inr_related y1 y2 : R2 y1 y2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inr y1) (inr y2).

Section sum_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance sum_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. intros ?? [?|?]; constructor; reflexivity. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; inversion_clear 1; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
  Global Instance inl_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_proper' : Proper (R2 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
699 700 701 702
  Global Instance inl_inj' : Inj R1 (sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_inj' : Inj R2 (sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
703 704 705 706 707
End sum_relation.

Instance sum_equiv `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Equiv (A + B) := sum_relation () ().
Instance inl_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inr A B) := _.
708 709
Instance inl_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inr A B) := _.
710 711
Typeclasses Opaque sum_equiv.

712 713
(** ** Option *)
Instance option_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (option A) := populate None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
714

715
(** ** Sigma types *)
716 717 718
Arguments existT {_ _} _ _ : assert.
Arguments projT1 {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments projT2 {_ _} _ : assert.
719

720 721 722
Arguments exist {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments proj1_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments proj2_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
723 724
Notation "x ↾ p" := (exist _ x p) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "` x" := (proj1_sig x) (at level 10, format "` x") : stdpp_scope.
725

726 727 728
Lemma proj1_sig_inj {A} (P : A  Prop) x (Px : P x) y (Py : P y) :
  xPx = yPy  x = y.
Proof. injection 1; trivial. Qed.
729

730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739
Section sig_map.
  Context `{P : A  Prop} `{Q : B  Prop} (f : A  B) (Hf :  x, P x  Q (f x)).
  Definition sig_map (x : sig P) : sig Q := f (`x)  Hf _ (proj2_sig x).
  Global Instance sig_map_inj:
    ( x, ProofIrrel (P x))  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) sig_map.
  Proof.
    intros ?? [x Hx] [y Hy]. injection 1. intros Hxy.
    apply (inj f) in Hxy; subst. rewrite (proof_irrel _ Hy). auto.
  Qed.
End sig_map.
740
Arguments sig_map _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
741

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
742

743
(** * Operations on collections *)
744
(** We define operational type classes for the traditional operations and
745
relations on collections: the empty collection [∅], the union [(∪)],
746
intersection [(∩)], and difference [(∖)], the singleton [{[_]}], the subset
747
[(⊆)] and element of [(∈)] relation, and disjointess [(##)]. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
748
Class Empty A := empty: A.
749
Hint Mode Empty ! : typeclass_instances.
750
Notation "∅" := empty (format "∅") : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
751

752 753
Instance empty_inhabited `(Empty A) : Inhabited A := populate .

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
754
Class Union A := union: A  A  A.
755
Hint Mode Union ! : typeclass_instances.
756
Instance: Params (@union) 2.
757 758 759 760 761 762
Infix "∪" := union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪)" := union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∪)" := (union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪ x )" := (λ y, union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∪*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
763
Infix "∪**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
764
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
765
Infix "∪*∪**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
766
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767

768
Definition union_list `{Empty A} `{Union A} : list A  A := fold_right () .
769
Arguments union_list _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
770
Notation "⋃ l" := (union_list l) (at level 20, format "⋃  l") : stdpp_scope.
771

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772
Class Intersection A := intersection: A  A  A.
773
Hint Mode Intersection ! : typeclass_instances.
774
Instance: Params (@intersection) 2.
775 776 777 778
Infix "∩" := intersection (at level 40) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩)" := intersection (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∩)" := (intersection x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩ x )" := (λ y, intersection y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779 780

Class Difference A := difference: A  A  A.
781
Hint Mode Difference ! : typeclass_instances.
782
Instance: Params (@difference) 2.
783 784 785 786 787 788
Infix "∖" := difference (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖)" := difference (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∖)" := (difference x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖ x )" := (λ y, difference y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∖*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
789
Infix "∖**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
790
  (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
791
Infix "∖*∖**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
792
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
793

794
Class Singleton A B := singleton: A  B.
795
Hint Mode Singleton - ! : typeclass_instances.
796
Instance: Params (@singleton) 3.
797
Notation "{[ x ]}" := (singleton x) (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
798
Notation "{[ x ; y ; .. ; z ]}" :=
799
  (union .. (union (singleton x) (singleton y)) .. (singleton z))
800
  (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
801
Notation "{[ x , y ]}" := (singleton (x,y))
802
  (at level 1, y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
803
Notation "{[ x , y , z ]}" := (singleton (x,y,z))
804
  (at level 1, y at next level, z at next level) : stdpp_scope.
805

806
Class SubsetEq A := subseteq: relation A.
807
Hint Mode SubsetEq ! : typeclass_instances.
808
Instance: Params (@subseteq) 2.
809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816
Infix "⊆" := subseteq (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆)" := subseteq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊆)" := (subseteq X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊈ Y" := (¬X  Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊈)" := (λ X Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊈)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊈ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
817 818 819 820

Infix "⊆@{ A }" := (@subseteq A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆@{ A } )" := (@subseteq A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.

821 822 823 824 825 826 827
Infix "⊆*" := (Forall2 ()) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆*)" := (Forall2 ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆**" := (Forall2 (*)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆1*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1  q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆2*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2  q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆1**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 * q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆2**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 * q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
828

Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
829 830 831
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_ * _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_ ** _) => reflexivity : core.
832

833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840
Infix "⊂" := (strict ()) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂)" := (strict ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊂)" := (strict () X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊄ Y" := (¬X  Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊄)" := (λ X Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊄)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊄ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
841

842 843 844
Infix "⊂@{ A }" := (strict (@{A})) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂@{ A } )" := (strict (@{A})) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.

845 846 847 848
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊆ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊂ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊆ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊂ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
849

850 851 852 853
(** The class [Lexico A] is used for the lexicographic order on [A]. This order
is used to create finite maps, finite sets, etc, and is typically different from
the order [(⊆)]. *)
Class Lexico A := lexico: relation A.
854
Hint Mode Lexico ! : typeclass_instances.
855

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
856
Class ElemOf A B := elem_of: A  B  Prop.
857
Hint Mode ElemOf - ! : typeclass_instances.
858
Instance: Params (@elem_of) 3.
859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866
Infix "∈" := elem_of (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈)" := elem_of (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∈)" := (elem_of x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈ X )" := (λ x, elem_of x X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ∉ X" := (¬x  X) (at level 80) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∉)" := (λ x X, x  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∉)" := (λ X, x  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∉ X )" := (λ x, x  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
867

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
868 869 870
Infix "∈@{ B }" := (@elem_of _ B _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈@{ B } )" := (@elem_of _ B _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
871
Class Disjoint A := disjoint : A  A  Prop.
872
 Hint Mode Disjoint ! : typeclass_instances.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
873
Instance: Params (@disjoint) 2.
874 875 876 877
Infix "##" := disjoint (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##)" := disjoint (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ##.)" := (disjoint X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.## X )" := (λ Y, Y ## X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
878 879 880 881

Infix "##@{ A }" := (@disjoint A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##@{ A } )" := (@disjoint A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.

882 883 884 885 886 887 888
Infix "##*" := (Forall2 (##)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##*)" := (Forall2 (##)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##**" := (Forall2 (##*)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##1*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 ## q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##2*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 ## q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##1**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 ##* q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##2**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 ##* q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
889 890
Hint Extern 0 (_ ## _) => symmetry; eassumption : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_ ##* _) => symmetry; eassumption : core.
891 892

Class DisjointE E A := disjointE : E  A  A  Prop.
893
Hint Mode DisjointE - ! : typeclass_instances.
894
Instance: Params (@disjointE) 4.
895
Notation "X ##{ Γ } Y" := (disjointE Γ X Y)
896 897
  (at level 70, format "X  ##{ Γ }  Y") : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##{ Γ } )" := (disjointE Γ) (only parsing, Γ at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
898
Notation "Xs ##{ Γ }* Ys" := (Forall2 (##{Γ}) Xs Ys)
899
  (at level 70, format "Xs  ##{ Γ }*  Ys") : stdpp_scope.
900
Notation "(##{ Γ }* )" := (Forall2 (##{Γ}))
901
  (only parsing, Γ at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
902
Notation "X ##{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 } Y" := (disjoint (pair .. (Γ1, Γ2) .. Γ3) X Y)
903
  (at level 70, format "X  ##{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }  Y") : stdpp_scope.
904
Notation "Xs ##{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }* Ys" :=
905
  (Forall2 (disjoint (pair .. (Γ1, Γ2) .. Γ3)) Xs Ys)
906
  (at level 70, format "Xs  ##{ Γ1 ,  Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }*  Ys") : stdpp_scope.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
907
Hint Extern 0 (_ ##{_} _) => symmetry; eassumption : core.
908 909

Class DisjointList A := disjoint_list : list A  Prop.
910
Hint Mode DisjointList ! : typeclass_instances.
911
Instance: Params (@disjoint_list) 2.
912
Notation "## Xs" := (disjoint_list Xs) (at level 20, format "##  Xs") : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
913 914
Notation "##@{ A } Xs" :=
  (@disjoint_list A _ Xs) (at level 20, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
915

916 917
Section disjoint_list.
  Context `{Disjoint A, Union A, Empty A}.
918 919
  Implicit Types X : A.

920
  Inductive disjoint_list_default : DisjointList A :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
921
    | disjoint_nil_2 : ##@{A} []
922
    | disjoint_cons_2 (X : A) (Xs : list A) : X ##  Xs  ## Xs  ## (X :: Xs).
923
  Global Existing Instance disjoint_list_default.
924

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
925
  Lemma disjoint_list_nil  : ##@{A} []  True.
926
  Proof. split; constructor. Qed.
927
  Lemma disjoint_list_cons X Xs : ## (X :: Xs)  X ##  Xs  ## Xs.
928
  Proof. split. inversion_clear 1; auto. intros [??]. constructor; auto. Qed.
929
End disjoint_list.
930 931

Class Filter A B := filter:  (P : A  Prop) `{ x, Decision (P x)}, B  B.