Commit e9a9e56e authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers

README tweaks.

parent 1a34a493
......@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ Iron has been built and tested with the following dependencies
specific to this logic that are used later.
- The machinery for connecting the generalized proofmode/MoSeL from to
fractional predicates is contained in (theories/proofmode)[theories/proofmode].
fractional predicates is contained in [theories/proofmode](theories/proofmode).
- In (theories/iron_logic)[theories/iron_logic] much of the core Iron logic
- In [theories/iron_logic](theories/iron_logic) much of the core Iron logic
discussed in Section 2 is defined.
* _Uniformity_ with respect to fractions is defined in
[theories/iron_logic/iron.v](theories/iron_logic/iron.v) as `Uniform` and
......@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Iron has been built and tested with the following dependencies
[theories/heap_lang/heap.v](theories/heap_lang/heap.v) as `heapG`. So too
are the definitions of ↦ and 𝖊 (in the formalization called `perm`).
* The theorems stated in Section 5 about updates to the heap ghost
state are proven in (theories/heap_lang/heap.v)[theories/heap_lang/heap.v].
state are proven in [theories/heap_lang/heap.v](theories/heap_lang/heap.v).
* The state interpretation from Section 5 is defined in
[theories/heap_lang/heap.v](theories/heap_lang/heap.v) as `heap_ctx`.
* Theorems 2.1, 2.2, 4.1, and 4.2 are proven in
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment