Commit d6e6d71e authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung

Bring back wp_bindi

I know we don't use it.  Stating theorems also serves to document things, and IMHO this one is informative.  It also costs us nothing.
parent f400f576
Pipeline #1794 passed with stage
......@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ Section heap.
Proof. by rewrite heap_mapsto_op_eq Qp_div_2. Qed.
(** Weakest precondition *)
(* FIXME: try to reduce usage of wp_pvs. We're losing view shifts here. *)
Lemma wp_alloc N E e v Φ :
to_val e = Some v nclose N E
heap_ctx N ( l, l v ={E}= Φ (LitV (LitLoc l))) WP Alloc e @ E {{ Φ }}.
......
......@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ Lemma wp_bind {E e} K Φ :
WP e @ E {{ v, WP fill K (of_val v) @ E {{ Φ }} }} WP fill K e @ E {{ Φ }}.
Proof. exact: wp_ectx_bind. Qed.
Lemma wp_bindi {E e} Ki Φ :
WP e @ E {{ v, WP fill_item Ki (of_val v) @ E {{ Φ }} }}
WP fill_item Ki e @ E {{ Φ }}.
Proof. exact: weakestpre.wp_bind. Qed.
(** Base axioms for core primitives of the language: Stateful reductions. *)
Lemma wp_alloc_pst E σ e v Φ :
to_val e = Some v
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment