Commit c02adf58 authored by Paolo G. Giarrusso's avatar Paolo G. Giarrusso

Explain why the rule looks different

parent c3e98412
......@@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ from timeless propositions even when working under the later modality:
\infer{\timeless{\prop} \and \prop \proves \later \propB}
{\later\prop \proves \later\propB}
\end{mathpar}
This rule looks different from the above ones, because we still do not have that
\begin{mathpar}
\inferH{later-fake-rule}{\timeless{\prop}}
{\later\prop \proves \prop}
\end{mathpar}
The following rules can be derived about except-0:
\begin{mathpar}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment