Commit a0b4ccc2 authored by Dan Frumin's avatar Dan Frumin

fix typo

parent eaeb5851
......@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ With this lemma in hand, the proof of \thmref{thm:counterexample-1} is simple.
\label{app:section:invariants-without-a-later}
Now we come to the main paradox: if we remove the $\later$ from \ruleref{inv-open}, the logic becomes inconsistent.
The theorem is stated as general as possible so taht it also applies to previous, less powerful versions of Iris.
The theorem is stated as general as possible so that it also applies to previous, less powerful versions of Iris.
\begin{thm}
\label{thm:counterexample-2}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment