From algebra Require Export cmra. From algebra Require Import functor upred. (** * Indexed product *) (** Need to put this in a definition to make canonical structures to work. *) Definition iprod {A} (B : A → cofeT) := ∀ x, B x. Definition iprod_insert {A} {B : A → cofeT} `{∀ x x' : A, Decision (x = x')} (x : A) (y : B x) (f : iprod B) : iprod B := λ x', match decide (x = x') with left H => eq_rect _ B y _ H | right _ => f x' end. Global Instance iprod_empty {A} {B : A → cofeT} `{∀ x, Empty (B x)} : Empty (iprod B) := λ x, ∅. Definition iprod_singleton {A} {B : A → cofeT} `{∀ x x' : A, Decision (x = x'), ∀ x : A, Empty (B x)} (x : A) (y : B x) : iprod B := iprod_insert x y ∅. Instance: Params (@iprod_insert) 4. Instance: Params (@iprod_singleton) 5. Section iprod_cofe. Context {A} {B : A → cofeT}. Implicit Types x : A. Implicit Types f g : iprod B. Instance iprod_equiv : Equiv (iprod B) := λ f g, ∀ x, f x ≡ g x. Instance iprod_dist : Dist (iprod B) := λ n f g, ∀ x, f x ≡{n}≡ g x. Program Definition iprod_chain (c : chain (iprod B)) (x : A) : chain (B x) := {| chain_car n := c n x |}. Next Obligation. by intros c x n i ?; apply (chain_cauchy c). Qed. Program Instance iprod_compl : Compl (iprod B) := λ c x, compl (iprod_chain c x). Definition iprod_cofe_mixin : CofeMixin (iprod B). Proof. split. - intros f g; split; [intros Hfg n k; apply equiv_dist, Hfg|]. intros Hfg k; apply equiv_dist; intros n; apply Hfg. - intros n; split. + by intros f x. + by intros f g ? x. + by intros f g h ?? x; trans (g x). - intros n f g Hfg x; apply dist_S, Hfg. - intros n c x. rewrite /compl /iprod_compl (conv_compl n (iprod_chain c x)). apply (chain_cauchy c); lia. Qed. Canonical Structure iprodC : cofeT := CofeT iprod_cofe_mixin. (** Properties of empty *) Section empty. Context `{∀ x, Empty (B x)}. Definition iprod_lookup_empty x : ∅ x = ∅ := eq_refl. Global Instance iprod_empty_timeless : (∀ x : A, Timeless (∅ : B x)) → Timeless (∅ : iprod B). Proof. intros ? f Hf x. by apply: timeless. Qed. End empty. (** Properties of iprod_insert. *) Context `{∀ x x' : A, Decision (x = x')}. Global Instance iprod_insert_ne n x : Proper (dist n ==> dist n ==> dist n) (iprod_insert x). Proof. intros y1 y2 ? f1 f2 ? x'; rewrite /iprod_insert. by destruct (decide _) as [[]|]. Qed. Global Instance iprod_insert_proper x : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡) ==> (≡)) (iprod_insert x) := ne_proper_2 _. Lemma iprod_lookup_insert f x y : (iprod_insert x y f) x = y. Proof. rewrite /iprod_insert; destruct (decide _) as [Hx|]; last done. by rewrite (proof_irrel Hx eq_refl). Qed. Lemma iprod_lookup_insert_ne f x x' y : x ≠ x' → (iprod_insert x y f) x' = f x'. Proof. by rewrite /iprod_insert; destruct (decide _). Qed. Global Instance iprod_lookup_timeless f x : Timeless f → Timeless (f x). Proof. intros ? y ?. cut (f ≡ iprod_insert x y f). { by move=> /(_ x)->; rewrite iprod_lookup_insert. } by apply: timeless=>x'; destruct (decide (x = x')) as [->|]; rewrite ?iprod_lookup_insert ?iprod_lookup_insert_ne. Qed. Global Instance iprod_insert_timeless f x y : Timeless f → Timeless y → Timeless (iprod_insert x y f). Proof. intros ?? g Heq x'; destruct (decide (x = x')) as [->|]. - rewrite iprod_lookup_insert. apply: timeless. by rewrite -(Heq x') iprod_lookup_insert. - rewrite iprod_lookup_insert_ne //. apply: timeless. by rewrite -(Heq x') iprod_lookup_insert_ne. Qed. (** Properties of iprod_singletom. *) Context `{∀ x : A, Empty (B x)}. Global Instance iprod_singleton_ne n x : Proper (dist n ==> dist n) (iprod_singleton x). Proof. by intros y1 y2 Hy; rewrite /iprod_singleton Hy. Qed. Global Instance iprod_singleton_proper x : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (iprod_singleton x) := ne_proper _. Lemma iprod_lookup_singleton x y : (iprod_singleton x y) x = y. Proof. by rewrite /iprod_singleton iprod_lookup_insert. Qed. Lemma iprod_lookup_singleton_ne x x' y: x ≠ x' → (iprod_singleton x y) x' = ∅. Proof. intros; by rewrite /iprod_singleton iprod_lookup_insert_ne. Qed. Global Instance iprod_singleton_timeless x (y : B x) : (∀ x : A, Timeless (∅ : B x)) → Timeless y → Timeless (iprod_singleton x y). Proof. eauto using iprod_insert_timeless, iprod_empty_timeless. Qed. End iprod_cofe. Arguments iprodC {_} _. Section iprod_cmra. Context {A} {B : A → cmraT}. Implicit Types f g : iprod B. Instance iprod_op : Op (iprod B) := λ f g x, f x ⋅ g x. Instance iprod_unit : Unit (iprod B) := λ f x, unit (f x). Instance iprod_valid : Valid (iprod B) := λ f, ∀ x, ✓ f x. Instance iprod_validN : ValidN (iprod B) := λ n f, ∀ x, ✓{n} f x. Instance iprod_div : Div (iprod B) := λ f g x, f x ÷ g x. Definition iprod_lookup_op f g x : (f ⋅ g) x = f x ⋅ g x := eq_refl. Definition iprod_lookup_unit f x : (unit f) x = unit (f x) := eq_refl. Definition iprod_lookup_div f g x : (f ÷ g) x = f x ÷ g x := eq_refl. Lemma iprod_included_spec (f g : iprod B) : f ≼ g ↔ ∀ x, f x ≼ g x. Proof. split. - by intros [h Hh] x; exists (h x); rewrite /op /iprod_op (Hh x). - intros Hh; exists (g ÷ f)=> x; specialize (Hh x). by rewrite /op /iprod_op /div /iprod_div cmra_op_div. Qed. Definition iprod_cmra_mixin : CMRAMixin (iprod B). Proof. split. - by intros n f1 f2 f3 Hf x; rewrite iprod_lookup_op (Hf x). - by intros n f1 f2 Hf x; rewrite iprod_lookup_unit (Hf x). - by intros n f1 f2 Hf ? x; rewrite -(Hf x). - by intros n f f' Hf g g' Hg i; rewrite iprod_lookup_div (Hf i) (Hg i). - intros g; split. + intros Hg n i; apply cmra_valid_validN, Hg. + intros Hg i; apply cmra_valid_validN=> n; apply Hg. - intros n f Hf x; apply cmra_validN_S, Hf. - by intros f1 f2 f3 x; rewrite iprod_lookup_op assoc. - by intros f1 f2 x; rewrite iprod_lookup_op comm. - by intros f x; rewrite iprod_lookup_op iprod_lookup_unit cmra_unit_l. - by intros f x; rewrite iprod_lookup_unit cmra_unit_idemp. - intros f1 f2; rewrite !iprod_included_spec=> Hf x. by rewrite iprod_lookup_unit; apply cmra_unit_preserving, Hf. - intros n f1 f2 Hf x; apply cmra_validN_op_l with (f2 x), Hf. - intros f1 f2; rewrite iprod_included_spec=> Hf x. by rewrite iprod_lookup_op iprod_lookup_div cmra_op_div; try apply Hf. - intros n f f1 f2 Hf Hf12. set (g x := cmra_extend n (f x) (f1 x) (f2 x) (Hf x) (Hf12 x)). exists ((λ x, (proj1_sig (g x)).1), (λ x, (proj1_sig (g x)).2)). split_and?; intros x; apply (proj2_sig (g x)). Qed. Canonical Structure iprodR : cmraT := CMRAT iprod_cofe_mixin iprod_cmra_mixin. Global Instance iprod_cmra_identity `{∀ x, Empty (B x)} : (∀ x, CMRAIdentity (B x)) → CMRAIdentity iprodR. Proof. intros ?; split. - intros x; apply cmra_empty_valid. - by intros f x; rewrite iprod_lookup_op left_id. - by apply _. Qed. (** Internalized properties *) Lemma iprod_equivI {M} g1 g2 : (g1 ≡ g2)%I ≡ (∀ i, g1 i ≡ g2 i : uPred M)%I. Proof. by uPred.unseal. Qed. Lemma iprod_validI {M} g : (✓ g)%I ≡ (∀ i, ✓ g i : uPred M)%I. Proof. by uPred.unseal. Qed. (** Properties of iprod_insert. *) Context `{∀ x x' : A, Decision (x = x')}. Lemma iprod_insert_updateP x (P : B x → Prop) (Q : iprod B → Prop) g y1 : y1 ~~>: P → (∀ y2, P y2 → Q (iprod_insert x y2 g)) → iprod_insert x y1 g ~~>: Q. Proof. intros Hy1 HP n gf Hg. destruct (Hy1 n (gf x)) as (y2&?&?). { move: (Hg x). by rewrite iprod_lookup_op iprod_lookup_insert. } exists (iprod_insert x y2 g); split; [auto|]. intros x'; destruct (decide (x' = x)) as [->|]; rewrite iprod_lookup_op ?iprod_lookup_insert //; []. move: (Hg x'). by rewrite iprod_lookup_op !iprod_lookup_insert_ne. Qed. Lemma iprod_insert_updateP' x (P : B x → Prop) g y1 : y1 ~~>: P → iprod_insert x y1 g ~~>: λ g', ∃ y2, g' = iprod_insert x y2 g ∧ P y2. Proof. eauto using iprod_insert_updateP. Qed. Lemma iprod_insert_update g x y1 y2 : y1 ~~> y2 → iprod_insert x y1 g ~~> iprod_insert x y2 g. Proof. rewrite !cmra_update_updateP; eauto using iprod_insert_updateP with subst. Qed. (** Properties of iprod_singleton. *) Context `{∀ x, Empty (B x), ∀ x, CMRAIdentity (B x)}. Lemma iprod_singleton_validN n x (y: B x) : ✓{n} iprod_singleton x y ↔ ✓{n} y. Proof. split; [by move=>/(_ x); rewrite iprod_lookup_singleton|]. move=>Hx x'; destruct (decide (x = x')) as [->|]; rewrite ?iprod_lookup_singleton ?iprod_lookup_singleton_ne //. by apply cmra_empty_validN. Qed. Lemma iprod_unit_singleton x (y : B x) : unit (iprod_singleton x y) ≡ iprod_singleton x (unit y). Proof. by move=>x'; destruct (decide (x = x')) as [->|]; rewrite iprod_lookup_unit ?iprod_lookup_singleton ?iprod_lookup_singleton_ne // cmra_unit_empty. Qed. Lemma iprod_op_singleton (x : A) (y1 y2 : B x) : iprod_singleton x y1 ⋅ iprod_singleton x y2 ≡ iprod_singleton x (y1 ⋅ y2). Proof. intros x'; destruct (decide (x' = x)) as [->|]. - by rewrite iprod_lookup_op !iprod_lookup_singleton. - by rewrite iprod_lookup_op !iprod_lookup_singleton_ne // left_id. Qed. Lemma iprod_singleton_updateP x (P : B x → Prop) (Q : iprod B → Prop) y1 : y1 ~~>: P → (∀ y2, P y2 → Q (iprod_singleton x y2)) → iprod_singleton x y1 ~~>: Q. Proof. rewrite /iprod_singleton; eauto using iprod_insert_updateP. Qed. Lemma iprod_singleton_updateP' x (P : B x → Prop) y1 : y1 ~~>: P → iprod_singleton x y1 ~~>: λ g, ∃ y2, g = iprod_singleton x y2 ∧ P y2. Proof. eauto using iprod_singleton_updateP. Qed. Lemma iprod_singleton_update x y1 y2 : y1 ~~> y2 → iprod_singleton x y1 ~~> iprod_singleton x y2. Proof. eauto using iprod_insert_update. Qed. Lemma iprod_singleton_updateP_empty x (P : B x → Prop) (Q : iprod B → Prop) : ∅ ~~>: P → (∀ y2, P y2 → Q (iprod_singleton x y2)) → ∅ ~~>: Q. Proof. intros Hx HQ n gf Hg. destruct (Hx n (gf x)) as (y2&?&?); first apply Hg. exists (iprod_singleton x y2); split; [by apply HQ|]. intros x'; destruct (decide (x' = x)) as [->|]. - by rewrite iprod_lookup_op iprod_lookup_singleton. - rewrite iprod_lookup_op iprod_lookup_singleton_ne //. apply Hg. Qed. Lemma iprod_singleton_updateP_empty' x (P : B x → Prop) : ∅ ~~>: P → ∅ ~~>: λ g, ∃ y2, g = iprod_singleton x y2 ∧ P y2. Proof. eauto using iprod_singleton_updateP_empty. Qed. End iprod_cmra. Arguments iprodR {_} _. (** * Functor *) Definition iprod_map {A} {B1 B2 : A → cofeT} (f : ∀ x, B1 x → B2 x) (g : iprod B1) : iprod B2 := λ x, f _ (g x). Lemma iprod_map_ext {A} {B1 B2 : A → cofeT} (f1 f2 : ∀ x, B1 x → B2 x) g : (∀ x, f1 x (g x) ≡ f2 x (g x)) → iprod_map f1 g ≡ iprod_map f2 g. Proof. done. Qed. Lemma iprod_map_id {A} {B: A → cofeT} (g : iprod B) : iprod_map (λ _, id) g = g. Proof. done. Qed. Lemma iprod_map_compose {A} {B1 B2 B3 : A → cofeT} (f1 : ∀ x, B1 x → B2 x) (f2 : ∀ x, B2 x → B3 x) (g : iprod B1) : iprod_map (λ x, f2 x ∘ f1 x) g = iprod_map f2 (iprod_map f1 g). Proof. done. Qed. Instance iprod_map_ne {A} {B1 B2 : A → cofeT} (f : ∀ x, B1 x → B2 x) n : (∀ x, Proper (dist n ==> dist n) (f x)) → Proper (dist n ==> dist n) (iprod_map f). Proof. by intros ? y1 y2 Hy x; rewrite /iprod_map (Hy x). Qed. Instance iprod_map_cmra_monotone {A} {B1 B2: A → cmraT} (f : ∀ x, B1 x → B2 x) : (∀ x, CMRAMonotone (f x)) → CMRAMonotone (iprod_map f). Proof. split; first apply _. - intros n g Hg x; rewrite /iprod_map; apply (validN_preserving (f _)), Hg. - intros g1 g2; rewrite !iprod_included_spec=> Hf x. rewrite /iprod_map; apply (included_preserving _), Hf. Qed. Definition iprodC_map {A} {B1 B2 : A → cofeT} (f : iprod (λ x, B1 x -n> B2 x)) : iprodC B1 -n> iprodC B2 := CofeMor (iprod_map f). Instance iprodC_map_ne {A} {B1 B2 : A → cofeT} n : Proper (dist n ==> dist n) (@iprodC_map A B1 B2). Proof. intros f1 f2 Hf g x; apply Hf. Qed. Program Definition iprodF {A} (Σ : A → iFunctor) : iFunctor := {| ifunctor_car B := iprodR (λ x, Σ x B); ifunctor_map B1 B2 f := iprodC_map (λ x, ifunctor_map (Σ x) f); |}. Next Obligation. by intros A Σ B1 B2 n f f' ? g; apply iprodC_map_ne=>x; apply ifunctor_map_ne. Qed. Next Obligation. intros A Σ B g. rewrite /= -{2}(iprod_map_id g). apply iprod_map_ext=> x; apply ifunctor_map_id. Qed. Next Obligation. intros A Σ B1 B2 B3 f1 f2 g. rewrite /= -iprod_map_compose. apply iprod_map_ext=> y; apply ifunctor_map_compose. Qed.