Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
I
Iris
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 122
    • Issues 122
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 18
    • Merge Requests 18
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Iris
  • Iris
  • Issues
  • #36

Closed
Open
Opened Sep 29, 2016 by Ralf Jung@jungOwner

STSs: Consider changing the def. of frame-steps

Jeehoon wrote on the iris-club list:

the definition of s \stackrel{T}{\rightarrow} s' involves the existential quantification of T1 and T2, and I think there exists an alternative definition that does not involve that quantification: $(\mathcal{L}(s') # T) /\ s \rightarrow s' .$ This is obtained by letting T1 and T2 be (\mathcal{L}(s') \setminus \mathcal{L}(s)) and (\mathcal{L}(s) \setminus \mathcal{L}(s')).

We could change frame_step accordingly, maybe this simplifies some things a little.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: iris/iris#36