1. 25 Oct, 2016 3 commits
  2. 12 Oct, 2016 1 commit
  3. 05 Oct, 2016 1 commit
  4. 09 Sep, 2016 1 commit
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Support for specialization of P₁ -★ .. -★ Pₙ -★ Q where Q is persistent. · 090aaea3
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      Before this commit, given "HP" : P and "H" : P -★ Q with Q persistent, one
      could write:
      
        iSpecialize ("H" with "#HP")
      
      to eliminate the wand in "H" while keeping the resource "HP". The lemma:
      
        own_valid : own γ x ⊢ ✓ x
      
      was the prototypical example where this pattern (using the #) was used.
      
      However, the pattern was too limited. For example, given "H" : P₁ -★ P₂ -★ Q",
      one could not write iSpecialize ("H" with "#HP₁") because P₂ -★ Q is not
      persistent, even when Q is.
      
      So, instead, this commit introduces the following tactic:
      
        iSpecialize pm_trm as #
      
      which allows one to eliminate implications and wands while being able to use
      all hypotheses to prove the premises, as well as being able to use all
      hypotheses to prove the resulting goal.
      
      In the case of iDestruct, we now check whether all branches of the introduction
      pattern start with an `#` (moving the hypothesis to the persistent context) or
      `%` (moving the hypothesis to the pure Coq context). If this is the case, we
      allow one to use all hypotheses for proving the premises, as well as for proving
      the resulting goal.
      090aaea3
  5. 28 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  6. 23 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  7. 22 Aug, 2016 2 commits
  8. 08 Aug, 2016 4 commits
  9. 06 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  10. 05 Aug, 2016 3 commits
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      No longer break now_True abstraction. · 51b15fdc
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      And make it Typeclasses Opaque to ensure that we indeed do not do
      so using the proof mode.
      51b15fdc
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      A nicer version of adequacy of Iris and specialize it to heap_lang. · 5ee10883
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      Use it to prove that tests/barrier_client and tests/heap_lang are adequate.
      5ee10883
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Iris 3.0: invariants and weakest preconditions encoded in the logic. · 1f589858
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      This commit features:
      
      - A simpler model. The recursive domain equation no longer involves a triple
        containing invariants, physical state and ghost state, but just ghost state.
        Invariants and physical state are encoded using (higher-order) ghost state.
      
      - (Primitive) view shifts are formalized in the logic and all properties about
        it are proven in the logic instead of the model. Instead, the core logic
        features only a notion of raw view shifts which internalizing performing frame
        preserving updates.
      
      - A better behaved notion of mask changing view shifts. In particular, we no
        longer have side-conditions on transitivity of view shifts, and we have a
        rule for introduction of mask changing view shifts |={E1,E2}=> P with
        E2 ⊆ E1 which allows to postpone performing a view shift.
      
      - The weakest precondition connective is formalized in the logic using Banach's
        fixpoint. All properties about the connective are proven in the logic instead
        of directly in the model.
      
      - Adequacy is proven in the logic and uses a primitive form of adequacy for
        uPred that only involves raw views shifts and laters.
      
      Some remarks:
      
      - I have removed binary view shifts. I did not see a way to describe all rules
        of the new mask changing view shifts using those.
      - There is no longer the need for the notion of "frame shifting assertions" and
        these are thus removed. The rules for Hoare triples are thus also stated in
        terms of primitive view shifts.
      
      TODO:
      
      - Maybe rename primitive view shift into something more sensible
      - Figure out a way to deal with closed proofs (see the commented out stuff in
        tests/heap_lang and tests/barrier_client).
      1f589858
  11. 19 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  12. 31 May, 2016 1 commit
  13. 28 May, 2016 1 commit
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      CMRAs with partial cores. · cfb00b3e
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      Based on an idea and WIP commits of J-H. Jourdan: the core of a CMRA
      A is now a partial function A → option A.
      
      TODO: define sum CMRA
      TODO: remove one shot CMRA and define it in terms of sum
      cfb00b3e
  14. 27 May, 2016 2 commits
  15. 19 Apr, 2016 1 commit
  16. 23 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  17. 10 Mar, 2016 3 commits
  18. 08 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  19. 07 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  20. 02 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  21. 25 Feb, 2016 2 commits
  22. 19 Feb, 2016 2 commits
  23. 18 Feb, 2016 2 commits