- 20 Sep, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
We only had the step-indexed version before. Unfortunately, the non step-indexed version does not follow from the step-indexed version.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 19 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 15 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 14 Sep, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Amin Timany authored
-
Amin Timany authored
-
Amin Timany authored
We need to change the core of X from ∅ to X to make elements of gset persistent.
-
- 13 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 09 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 07 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Joseph Tassarotti authored
-
- 06 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
I had to perform some renaming to avoid name clashes.
-
- 05 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 02 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 01 Sep, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Joseph Tassarotti authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 31 Aug, 2016 6 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Annoyingly, this requires one to prove the following in the model: (∀ x : A, ■ φ x) ⊢ ■ (∀ x : A, φ x)
-
Joseph Tassarotti authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 30 Aug, 2016 6 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Thanks to Ranald Clouston for suggesting the axiom: ▷ P ⊢ ▷ False ∨ (▷ False → P) This axiom is used to prove timeless of implication, wand and forall. Timelessness of the pure and ownM connectives is still proven in the model, but we first state the property in a way that it does not involved derived notions (like the except_last modality).
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It is unused, and ownM_empty is stronger.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
For that we need a slightly stronger property for distributing a later over an existential quantifier.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 28 Aug, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Joseph Tassarotti authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 25 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Following the time anology of later, the step-index 0 corresponds does not correspond to 'now', but rather to the end of time (i.e. 'last').
-