- 20 Feb, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
Revert "Remove the domain finiteness hypothesis for the function CMRA, and put cmra_extend in Type." This reverts commit fa897ff5.
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
The finiteness was needed to have the axiom of choice over the domain. This axiom is not needed if cmra_extend is in Type.
-
- 25 Oct, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Rename `UCMRA` → `Ucmra` Rename `CMRA` → `Cmra` Rename `OFE` → `Ofe` (`Ofe` was already used partially, but many occurences were missing) Rename `STS` → `Sts` Rename `DRA` → `Dra`
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 07 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 24 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Instead, I have introduced a type class `Monoid` that is used by the big operators: Class Monoid {M : ofeT} (o : M → M → M) := { monoid_unit : M; monoid_ne : NonExpansive2 o; monoid_assoc : Assoc (≡) o; monoid_comm : Comm (≡) o; monoid_left_id : LeftId (≡) monoid_unit o; monoid_right_id : RightId (≡) monoid_unit o; }. Note that the operation is an argument because we want to have multiple monoids over the same type (for example, on `uPred`s we have monoids for `∗`, `∧`, and `∨`). However, we do bundle the unit because: - If we would not, the unit would appear explicitly in an implicit argument of the big operators, which confuses rewrite. By bundling the unit in the `Monoid` class it is hidden, and hence rewrite won't even see it. - The unit is unique. We could in principle have big ops over setoids instead of OFEs. However, since we do not have a canonical structure for bundled setoids, I did not go that way.
-
- 09 Feb, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 01 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
Cancelable elements are a new way of proving local updates, by removing some cancellable element of the global state, provided that we own it and we are willing to lose this ownership. Identity-free elements are an auxiliary that is necessary to prove that [Some x] is cancelable. For technical reasons, these two notions are not defined exactly like what one might expect, but also take into account validity. Otherwise, an exclusive element would not be cancelable or idfree, which is rather confusing.
-
- 30 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 27 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 26 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 05 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 03 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
This patch was created using find -name *.v | xargs -L 1 awk -i inplace '{from = 0} /^From/{ from = 1; ever_from = 1} { if (from == 0 && seen == 0 && ever_from == 1) { print "Set Default Proof Using \"Type*\"."; seen = 1 } }1 ' and some minor manual editing
-
- 09 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 22 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
Use COFEs only for the recursive domain equation solver
-
- 25 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 06 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 28 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This allows us to factor out properties about connectives that commute with the big operators.
-
- 20 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 14 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This is more consistent with the definition of the extension order, which is also defined in terms of an existential.
-
- 25 Jul, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 01 Jul, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 23 Jun, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 15 Jun, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 31 May, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
be the same as
↔ . This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →.
-
- 30 May, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-