 24 May, 2016 5 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
Rationale: to make the code closer to what is on paper, I want the notations to look like quantifiers, i.e. have a binder builtin. I thus introduced the following notations: [★ map] k ↦ x ∈ m, P [★ set] x ∈ X, P The good thing  contrary to the notations that we had before that required an explicit lambda  is that type annotations of k and x are now not printed making goals much easier to read.

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
To do so, we have introduced the specialization patterns: =>[H1 .. Hn] and =>[H1 .. Hn] That generate a goal in which the view shift is preserved. These specialization patterns can also be used for e.g. iApply. Note that this machinery is not tied to primitive view shifts, and works for various kinds of goal (as captured by the ToAssert type class, which describes how to transform the asserted goal based on the main goal). TODO: change the name of these specialization patterns to reflect this generality.

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
Changes:  We no longer have a different syntax for specializing a term H : P ★ Q whose range P or domain Q is persistent. There is just one syntax, and the system automatically determines whether either P or Q is persistent.  While specializing a term, always modalities are automatically stripped. This gets rid of the specialization pattern !.  Make the syntax of specialization patterns more consistent. The syntax for generating a goal is [goal_spec] where goal_spec is one of the following: H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using hypotheses H1 .. Hn H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using all hypotheses but H1 .. Hn # : generate a goal for the premise in which all hypotheses can be used. This is only allowed when specializing H : P ★ Q where either P or Q is persistent. % : generate a goal for a pure premise.

 06 May, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 02 May, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
iSpecialize and iDestruct. These tactics now all take an iTrm, which is a tuple consisting of a.) a lemma or name of a hypotheses b.) arguments to instantiate c.) a specialization pattern.

 26 Apr, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
These tactics are superfluous:  iPure H as pat => iDestruct H as pat  iPersistent H => iSpecialize H "!"

 20 Apr, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
 It can now also frame under later.  Better treatment of evars, it now won't end up in loops whenever the goal involves subformulas ?P and it trying to apply all framing rules eagerly.  It no longer delta expands while framing.  Better clean up of True subformulas after a successful frame. For example, framing "P" in "▷ ▷ P ★ Q" yields just "Q" instead of "▷ True ★ Q" or so.

 19 Apr, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
This gets rid of the (ambiguous) notation %l, because we can declare LitLoc as a coercion. It also shortens the code.

Robbert Krebbers authored

 12 Apr, 2016 3 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
This reverts commit 3cc38ff6. The reverted pure hypotheses and variables appear in the wrong order.

Robbert Krebbers authored

 11 Apr, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 09 Apr, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 08 Apr, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
Since strip_later is doing a good job stripping laters in the conclusion, these tactics are thus no longer needed. Also, wp_finish now properly converts the result in a primitive viewshift in case it is not a weakestpre.

 20 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored

 15 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 11 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 10 Mar, 2016 5 commits


Ralf Jung authored

Ralf Jung authored

Ralf Jung authored

Ralf Jung authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
Thanks to Amin Timany for the suggestion.

 07 Mar, 2016 2 commits


Ralf Jung authored

Ralf Jung authored
Add both nonexpansive and contractive functors, and bundle them for the general Iris instance as well as the global functor construction This allows us to move the \later in the userdefined functor to any place we want. In particular, we can now have "\later (iProp > iProp)" in the ghost CMRA.

 06 Mar, 2016 3 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
Since functor instances are just used as combinators, there is really no need for functors that are not contractive.

Ralf Jung authored
make the global functor stuff in the various constructions more uniform; change it such that barrier/proof does not have to repeat the functors it needs

Ralf Jung authored
add a version of [cancel] that works with goals of the form [_  pvs _]; and use that for the barrier proof

 05 Mar, 2016 3 commits
 04 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored

 03 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 02 Mar, 2016 4 commits


Ralf Jung authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
This cleans up some adhoc stuff and prepares for a generalization of saved propositions.

 01 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored
