From b3d2ff9ba05f665ee8ae4f4547ef04bf11dc466b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robbert Krebbers
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:17:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Improve solve_proper a bit.
This is very experimental. It should now deal better with stuff like:
match x with .. end = match y with .. end
In case there is a hypothesis H : R x y, it will try to destruct it.
---
prelude/tactics.v | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/prelude/tactics.v b/prelude/tactics.v
index d299fe2f6..8a471ded5 100644
--- a/prelude/tactics.v
+++ b/prelude/tactics.v
@@ -260,12 +260,12 @@ favor the second. *)
Ltac f_equiv :=
match goal with
| _ => reflexivity
- (* We support matches on both sides, *if* they concern the same
- variable.
- TODO: We should support different variables, provided that we can
- derive contradictions for the off-diagonal cases. *)
+ (* We support matches on both sides, *if* they concern the same variable, or
+ variables in some relation. *)
| |- ?R (match ?x with _ => _ end) (match ?x with _ => _ end) =>
destruct x
+ | H : ?R ?x ?y |- ?R2 (match ?x with _ => _ end) (match ?y with _ => _ end) =>
+ destruct H
(* First assume that the arguments need the same relation as the result *)
| |- ?R (?f ?x) (?f _) => apply (_ : Proper (R ==> R) f)
(* For the case in which R is polymorphic, or an operational type class,
@@ -283,14 +283,11 @@ Ltac f_equiv :=
(* TODO: If some of the arguments are the same, we could also
query for "pointwise_relation"'s. But that leads to a combinatorial
explosion about which arguments are and which are not the same. *)
- | |- ?R (?f ?x) (?f _) =>
- apply (_ : Proper (_ ==> R) f)
- | |- ?R (?f ?x ?y) (?f _ _) =>
- apply (_ : Proper (_ ==> _ ==> R) f)
+ | |- ?R (?f ?x) (?f _) => apply (_ : Proper (_ ==> R) f)
+ | |- ?R (?f ?x ?y) (?f _ _) => apply (_ : Proper (_ ==> _ ==> R) f)
(* In case the function symbol differs, but the arguments are the same,
maybe we have a pointwise_relation in our context. *)
- | H : pointwise_relation _ ?R ?f ?g |- ?R (?f ?x) (?g ?x) =>
- apply H
+ | H : pointwise_relation _ ?R ?f ?g |- ?R (?f ?x) (?g ?x) => apply H
end.
(** auto_proper solves goals of the form "f _ = f _", for any relation and any
@@ -317,7 +314,8 @@ Ltac solve_proper :=
| |- Proper _ _ => intros ???
| |- (_ ==> _)%signature _ _ => intros ???
| |- pointwise_relation _ _ _ _ => intros ?
- end;
+ | |- ?R ?f _ => try let f' := constr:(λ x, f x) in intros ?
+ end; simpl;
(* Unfold the head symbol, which is the one we are proving a new property about *)
lazymatch goal with
| |- ?R (?f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) (?f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) => unfold f
--
GitLab