Skip to content

GitLab

Commit 99968b53 authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers
Browse files
Options

Change order or later and always so that the Löb lemmas are grouped.

parent d4fd7c20
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 74 additions and 78 deletions
algebra/upred.v
View file @ 99968b53
......@@ -162,12 +162,6 @@ Next Obligation.
eauto using cmra_validN_included, cmra_preserving_r.
Qed.
Program Definition uPred_later {M} (P : uPred M) : uPred M :=
{| uPred_holds n x := match n return _ with 0 => True | S n' => P n' x end |}.
Next Obligation. intros M P [|n] ??; eauto using uPred_ne,(dist_le (A:=M)). Qed.
Next Obligation.
intros M P [|n1] [|n2] x1 x2; eauto using uPred_weaken,cmra_validN_S; try lia.
Qed.
Program Definition uPred_always {M} (P : uPred M) : uPred M :=
{| uPred_holds n x := P n (unit x) |}.
Next Obligation. by intros M P x1 x2 n ? Hx; rewrite /= -Hx. Qed.
......@@ -175,6 +169,12 @@ Next Obligation.
intros M P n1 n2 x1 x2 ????; eapply uPred_weaken with n1 (unit x1);
eauto using cmra_unit_preserving, cmra_unit_validN.
Qed.
Program Definition uPred_later {M} (P : uPred M) : uPred M :=
{| uPred_holds n x := match n return _ with 0 => True | S n' => P n' x end |}.
Next Obligation. intros M P [|n] ??; eauto using uPred_ne,(dist_le (A:=M)). Qed.
Next Obligation.
intros M P [|n1] [|n2] x1 x2; eauto using uPred_weaken,cmra_validN_S; try lia.
Qed.
Program Definition uPred_ownM {M : cmraT} (a : M) : uPred M :=
{| uPred_holds n x := a ≼{n} x |}.
......@@ -207,10 +207,10 @@ Notation "∀ x .. y , P" :=
(uPred_forall (λ x, .. (uPred_forall (λ y, P)) ..)%I) : uPred_scope.
Notation "∃ x .. y , P" :=
(uPred_exist (λ x, .. (uPred_exist (λ y, P)) ..)%I) : uPred_scope.
Notation "▷ P" := (uPred_later P)
(at level 20, right associativity) : uPred_scope.
Notation "□ P" := (uPred_always P)
(at level 20, right associativity) : uPred_scope.
Notation "▷ P" := (uPred_later P)
(at level 20, right associativity) : uPred_scope.
Infix "≡" := uPred_eq : uPred_scope.
Notation "✓ x" := (uPred_valid x) (at level 20) : uPred_scope.
......@@ -690,67 +690,6 @@ Proof. by apply forall_intro=> a; rewrite forall_elim. Qed.
Lemma sep_forall_r {A} (Φ : A → uPred M) Q : ((∀ a, Φ a) ★ Q) ⊑ (∀ a, Φ a ★ Q).
Proof. by apply forall_intro=> a; rewrite forall_elim. Qed.
(* Later *)
Lemma later_mono P Q : P ⊑ Q → ▷ P ⊑ ▷ Q.
Proof. intros HP [|n] x ??; [done|apply HP; eauto using cmra_validN_S]. Qed.
Lemma later_intro P : P ⊑ ▷ P.
Proof.
intros [|n] x ??; simpl in *; [done|].
apply uPred_weaken with (S n) x; eauto using cmra_validN_S.
Qed.
Lemma löb P : (▷ P → P) ⊑ P.
Proof.
intros n x ? HP; induction n as [|n IH]; [by apply HP|].
apply HP, IH, uPred_weaken with (S n) x; eauto using cmra_validN_S.
Qed.
Lemma later_True' : True ⊑ (▷ True : uPred M).
Proof. by intros [|n] x. Qed.
Lemma later_and P Q : (▷ (P ∧ Q))%I ≡ (▷ P ∧ ▷ Q)%I.
Proof. by intros [|n] x; split. Qed.
Lemma later_or P Q : (▷ (P ∨ Q))%I ≡ (▷ P ∨ ▷ Q)%I.
Proof. intros [|n] x; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma later_forall {A} (Φ : A → uPred M) : (▷ ∀ a, Φ a)%I ≡ (∀ a, ▷ Φ a)%I.
Proof. by intros [|n] x. Qed.
Lemma later_exist_1 {A} (Φ : A → uPred M) : (∃ a, ▷ Φ a) ⊑ (▷ ∃ a, Φ a).
Proof. by intros [|[|n]] x. Qed.
Lemma later_exist `{Inhabited A} (Φ : A → uPred M) :
(▷ ∃ a, Φ a)%I ≡ (∃ a, ▷ Φ a)%I.
Proof. intros [|[|n]] x; split; done || by exists inhabitant; simpl. Qed.
Lemma later_sep P Q : (▷ (P ★ Q))%I ≡ (▷ P ★ ▷ Q)%I.
Proof.
intros n x ?; split.
- destruct n as [|n]; simpl.
{ by exists x, (unit x); rewrite cmra_unit_r. }
intros (x1&x2&Hx&?&?); destruct (cmra_extend_op n x x1 x2)
as ([y1 y2]&Hx'&Hy1&Hy2); eauto using cmra_validN_S; simpl in *.
exists y1, y2; split; [by rewrite Hx'|by rewrite Hy1 Hy2].
- destruct n as [|n]; simpl; [done|intros (x1&x2&Hx&?&?)].
exists x1, x2; eauto using dist_S.
Qed.
(* Later derived *)
Global Instance later_mono' : Proper ((⊑) ==> (⊑)) (@uPred_later M).
Proof. intros P Q; apply later_mono. Qed.
Lemma later_True : (▷ True : uPred M)%I ≡ True%I.
Proof. apply (anti_symm (⊑)); auto using later_True'. Qed.
Lemma later_impl P Q : ▷ (P → Q) ⊑ (▷ P → ▷ Q).
Proof.
apply impl_intro_l; rewrite -later_and.
apply later_mono, impl_elim with P; auto.
Qed.
Lemma later_wand P Q : ▷ (P -★ Q) ⊑ (▷ P -★ ▷ Q).
Proof. apply wand_intro_r;rewrite -later_sep; apply later_mono,wand_elim_l. Qed.
Lemma later_iff P Q : (▷ (P ↔ Q)) ⊑ (▷P ↔ ▷Q).
Proof. by rewrite /uPred_iff later_and !later_impl. Qed.
Lemma löb_strong P Q : (P ∧ ▷Q) ⊑ Q → P ⊑ Q.
Proof.
intros Hlöb. apply impl_entails.
etrans; last by eapply löb.
apply impl_intro_l, impl_intro_l. rewrite right_id -{2}Hlöb.
apply and_intro; first by eauto.
by rewrite {1}(later_intro P) later_impl impl_elim_r.
Qed.
(* Always *)
Lemma always_const φ : (□ ■ φ : uPred M)%I ≡ (■ φ)%I.
Proof. done. Qed.
......@@ -822,6 +761,72 @@ Proof. intros; rewrite -always_and_sep_l'; auto. Qed.
Lemma always_entails_r' P Q : (P ⊑ □ Q) → P ⊑ (P ★ □ Q).
Proof. intros; rewrite -always_and_sep_r'; auto. Qed.
(* Later *)
Lemma later_mono P Q : P ⊑ Q → ▷ P ⊑ ▷ Q.
Proof. intros HP [|n] x ??; [done|apply HP; eauto using cmra_validN_S]. Qed.
Lemma later_intro P : P ⊑ ▷ P.
Proof.
intros [|n] x ??; simpl in *; [done|].
apply uPred_weaken with (S n) x; eauto using cmra_validN_S.
Qed.
Lemma löb P : (▷ P → P) ⊑ P.
Proof.
intros n x ? HP; induction n as [|n IH]; [by apply HP|].
apply HP, IH, uPred_weaken with (S n) x; eauto using cmra_validN_S.
Qed.
Lemma later_True' : True ⊑ (▷ True : uPred M).
Proof. by intros [|n] x. Qed.
Lemma later_and P Q : (▷ (P ∧ Q))%I ≡ (▷ P ∧ ▷ Q)%I.
Proof. by intros [|n] x; split. Qed.
Lemma later_or P Q : (▷ (P ∨ Q))%I ≡ (▷ P ∨ ▷ Q)%I.
Proof. intros [|n] x; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma later_forall {A} (Φ : A → uPred M) : (▷ ∀ a, Φ a)%I ≡ (∀ a, ▷ Φ a)%I.
Proof. by intros [|n] x. Qed.
Lemma later_exist_1 {A} (Φ : A → uPred M) : (∃ a, ▷ Φ a) ⊑ (▷ ∃ a, Φ a).
Proof. by intros [|[|n]] x. Qed.
Lemma later_exist `{Inhabited A} (Φ : A → uPred M) :
(▷ ∃ a, Φ a)%I ≡ (∃ a, ▷ Φ a)%I.
Proof. intros [|[|n]] x; split; done || by exists inhabitant; simpl. Qed.
Lemma later_sep P Q : (▷ (P ★ Q))%I ≡ (▷ P ★ ▷ Q)%I.
Proof.
intros n x ?; split.
- destruct n as [|n]; simpl.
{ by exists x, (unit x); rewrite cmra_unit_r. }
intros (x1&x2&Hx&?&?); destruct (cmra_extend_op n x x1 x2)
as ([y1 y2]&Hx'&Hy1&Hy2); eauto using cmra_validN_S; simpl in *.
exists y1, y2; split; [by rewrite Hx'|by rewrite Hy1 Hy2].
- destruct n as [|n]; simpl; [done|intros (x1&x2&Hx&?&?)].
exists x1, x2; eauto using dist_S.
Qed.
(* Later derived *)
Global Instance later_mono' : Proper ((⊑) ==> (⊑)) (@uPred_later M).
Proof. intros P Q; apply later_mono. Qed.
Lemma later_True : (▷ True : uPred M)%I ≡ True%I.
Proof. apply (anti_symm (⊑)); auto using later_True'. Qed.
Lemma later_impl P Q : ▷ (P → Q) ⊑ (▷ P → ▷ Q).
Proof.
apply impl_intro_l; rewrite -later_and.
apply later_mono, impl_elim with P; auto.
Qed.
Lemma later_wand P Q : ▷ (P -★ Q) ⊑ (▷ P -★ ▷ Q).
Proof. apply wand_intro_r;rewrite -later_sep; apply later_mono,wand_elim_l. Qed.
Lemma later_iff P Q : (▷ (P ↔ Q)) ⊑ (▷ P ↔ ▷ Q).
Proof. by rewrite /uPred_iff later_and !later_impl. Qed.
Lemma löb_strong P Q : (P ∧ ▷ Q) ⊑ Q → P ⊑ Q.
Proof.
intros Hlöb. apply impl_entails. rewrite -(löb (P → Q)).
apply entails_impl, impl_intro_l. rewrite -{2}Hlöb.
apply and_intro; first by eauto.
by rewrite {1}(later_intro P) later_impl impl_elim_r.
Qed.
Lemma löb_strong_sep P Q : (P ★ ▷ (P -★ Q)) ⊑ Q → P ⊑ Q.
Proof.
move/wand_intro_l=>Hlöb. apply impl_entails.
rewrite -[(_ → _)%I]always_elim. apply löb_strong.
by rewrite left_id -always_wand_impl -always_later Hlöb.
Qed.
(* Own *)
Lemma ownM_op (a1 a2 : M) :
uPred_ownM (a1 ⋅ a2) ≡ (uPred_ownM a1 ★ uPred_ownM a2)%I.
......@@ -994,15 +999,6 @@ Lemma always_entails_l P Q `{!AlwaysStable Q} : (P ⊑ Q) → P ⊑ (Q ★ P).
Proof. by rewrite -(always_always Q); apply always_entails_l'. Qed.
Lemma always_entails_r P Q `{!AlwaysStable Q} : (P ⊑ Q) → P ⊑ (P ★ Q).
Proof. by rewrite -(always_always Q); apply always_entails_r'. Qed.
(* Derived lemmas that need a combination of the above *)
Lemma löb_strong_sep P Q : (P ★ ▷(P -★ Q)) ⊑ Q → P ⊑ Q.
Proof.
move/wand_intro_l=>Hlöb. rewrite -[P](left_id True (∧))%I.
apply impl_elim_l'. rewrite -[(_ → _)%I]always_elim. apply löb_strong.
rewrite left_id -always_wand_impl -always_later Hlöb. done.
Qed.
End uPred_logic.
(* Hint DB for the logic *)
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment