Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
I
Iris
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
107
Issues
107
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
13
Merge Requests
13
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Iris
Iris
Commits
953c27ac
Commit
953c27ac
authored
Dec 25, 2018
by
Robbert Krebbers
1
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Refactor `iPoseProof`.
Split it up into more logical parts.
parent
8c00cc65
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Sidebyside
Showing
2 changed files
with
35 additions
and
39 deletions
+35
39
tests/proofmode.ref
tests/proofmode.ref
+7
17
theories/proofmode/ltac_tactics.v
theories/proofmode/ltac_tactics.v
+28
22
No files found.
tests/proofmode.ref
View file @
953c27ac
...
...
@@ 467,12 +467,14 @@ Tactic failure: iStartProof: not a BI assertion.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iPoseProof (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"
<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>
" and
"
iPoseProofCoreLem (constr) as (constr) before_tc (tactic)
" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iIntoEmpValid>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iPoseProof: not a BI assertion.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iPoseProof (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"iPoseProofCoreLem (constr) as (constr) before_tc (tactic)",
"tac" (bound to spec_tac ltac:(()); [ ..  tac Htmp ]),
"tac" (bound to fun H => iDestructHyp H as pat),
"iDestructHyp (constr) as (constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iDestructHypFindPat>",
...
...
@@ 513,11 +515,7 @@ invalid.
: string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iApply (open_constr)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"goal_tac" (bound to fun _ => spec_tac ltac:(()); [ ..  tac Htmp ]),
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"tac" (bound to fun H => iApplyHyp H) and "iApplyHyp (constr)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iApply: cannot apply P.
...
...
@@ 525,11 +523,7 @@ Tactic failure: iApply: cannot apply P.
: string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iApply (open_constr)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"goal_tac" (bound to fun _ => spec_tac ltac:(()); [ ..  tac Htmp ]),
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"tac" (bound to fun H => iApplyHyp H) and "iApplyHyp (constr)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iApply: Q
...
...
@@ 538,11 +532,7 @@ not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine.
: string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iApply (open_constr)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"goal_tac" (bound to fun _ => spec_tac ltac:(()); [ ..  tac Htmp ]),
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"tac" (bound to fun H => iApplyHyp H) and "iApplyHyp (constr)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iApply: Q
...
...
theories/proofmode/ltac_tactics.v
View file @
953c27ac
...
...
@@ 847,25 +847,25 @@ Local Ltac iIntoEmpValid t :=
[
iSolveTC

fail
1
"iPoseProof: not a BI assertion"

exact
t
]].
Local
Ltac
iPoseProofCore_go
Htmp
t
goal_tac
:
=
lazymatch
type
of
t
with

ident
=>
eapply
tac_pose_proof_hyp
with
_
_
t
_
Htmp
_;
Tactic
Notation
"iPoseProofCoreHyp"
constr
(
H
)
"as"
constr
(
Hnew
)
:
=
eapply
tac_pose_proof_hyp
with
_
_
H
_
Hnew
_;
[
pm_reflexivity

let
t
:
=
pretty_ident
t
in
fail
"iPoseProof:"
t
"not found"
let
H
:
=
pretty_ident
H
in
fail
"iPoseProof:"
H
"not found"

pm_reflexivity

let
Htmp
:
=
pretty_ident
Htmp
in
fail
"iPoseProof:"
Htmp
"not fresh"

goal_tac
()]

_
=>
eapply
tac_pose_proof
with
_
Htmp
_;
(* (j:=H) *)
[
iIntoEmpValid
t
let
Htmp
:
=
pretty_ident
Hnew
in
fail
"iPoseProof:"
Hnew
"not fresh"
].
Tactic
Notation
"iPoseProofCoreLem"
constr
(
lem
)
"as"
constr
(
Hnew
)
"before_tc"
tactic
(
tac
)
:
=
eapply
tac_pose_proof
with
_
Hnew
_;
(* (j:=H) *)
[
iIntoEmpValid
lem

pm_reflexivity

let
Htmp
:
=
pretty_ident
H
tmp
in
fail
"iPoseProof:"
H
tmp
"not fresh"

goal_tac
()]
end
;
let
Htmp
:
=
pretty_ident
H
new
in
fail
"iPoseProof:"
H
new
"not fresh"

tac
]
;
(* Solve all remaining TC premises generated by [iIntoEmpValid] *)
try
iSolveTC
.
(** The tactic [iPoseProofCore lem as p lazy_tc tac] inserts the resource
...
...
@@ 878,8 +878,8 @@ There are a couple of additional arguments:
 The argument [p] is like that of [iSpecialize]. It is a Boolean that denotes
whether the conclusion of the specialized term [lem] is persistent.
 The argument [lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises
of [lem] should be performed before (if [lazy_tc = false]) or after
, i.e.
lazily (if
[lazy_tc = true]) [tac H] is called.
of [lem] should be performed before (if [lazy_tc = false]) or after
(if
[lazy_tc = true]) [tac H] is called.
Both variants of [lazy_tc] are used in other tactics that build on top of
[iPoseProofCore]:
...
...
@@ 898,12 +898,18 @@ Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
let
t
:
=
lazymatch
type
of
t
with
string
=>
constr
:
(
INamed
t
)

_
=>
t
end
in
let
spec_tac
_
:
=
lazymatch
lem
with

ITrm
?t
?xs
?pat
=>
iSpecializeCore
(
ITrm
Htmp
xs
pat
)
as
p

ITrm
_
?xs
?pat
=>
iSpecializeCore
(
ITrm
Htmp
xs
pat
)
as
p

_
=>
idtac
end
in
lazymatch
eval
compute
in
lazy_tc
with

true
=>
iPoseProofCore_go
Htmp
t
ltac
:
(
fun
_
=>
spec_tac
()
;
[..
tac
Htmp
])

false
=>
iPoseProofCore_go
Htmp
t
spec_tac
;
[..
tac
Htmp
]
lazymatch
type
of
t
with

ident
=>
iPoseProofCoreHyp
t
as
Htmp
;
spec_tac
()
;
[..
tac
Htmp
]

_
=>
lazymatch
eval
compute
in
lazy_tc
with

true
=>
iPoseProofCoreLem
t
as
Htmp
before_tc
(
spec_tac
()
;
[..
tac
Htmp
])

false
=>
iPoseProofCoreLem
t
as
Htmp
before_tc
(
spec_tac
())
;
[..
tac
Htmp
]
end
end
.
(** [iApply lem] takes an argument [lem : P₁ ∗ .. ∗ Pₙ ∗ Q] (after the
...
...
Robbert
@robbertkrebbers
mentioned in merge request
!273 (merged)
·
Jun 16, 2019
mentioned in merge request
!273 (merged)
mentioned in merge request !273
Toggle commit list
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment