Wrong kind of comment.

theories/proofmode/classes.v

@@ -43,19 +43,19 @@ Proof. by exists φ. Qed.
 Hint Extern 0 (IntoPureT _ _) =>
   notypeclasses refine (into_pureT_hint _ _ _) : typeclass_instances.
 
-(* [FromPure] is used when introducing a pure assertion. It is used by
-   iPure, the "[%]" specialization pattern, and the [with "[%]"]
-   pattern when using [iAssert].
-
-   The [a] Boolean asserts whether we introduce the pure assertion in
-   an affine way or in an absorbing way. When [FromPure true P φ] is
-   derived, then [FromPure false P φ] can always be derived too. We
-   use [true] for specialization patterns and [false] for the [iPure]
-   tactic.
-
-   This Boolean is not needed for [IntoPure], because in the case of
-   [IntoPure], we can have the same behavior by asking that [P] be
-   [Affine]. *)
+(** [FromPure] is used when introducing a pure assertion. It is used by
+    iPure, the "[%]" specialization pattern, and the [with "[%]"]
+    pattern when using [iAssert].
+
+    The [a] Boolean asserts whether we introduce the pure assertion in
+    an affine way or in an absorbing way. When [FromPure true P φ] is
+    derived, then [FromPure false P φ] can always be derived too. We
+    use [true] for specialization patterns and [false] for the [iPure]
+    tactic.
+
+    This Boolean is not needed for [IntoPure], because in the case of
+    [IntoPure], we can have the same behavior by asking that [P] be
+    [Affine]. *)
 Class FromPure {PROP : bi} (a : bool) (P : PROP) (φ : Prop) :=
   from_pure : bi_affinely_if a ⌜φ⌝ ⊢ P.
 Arguments FromPure {_} _ _%I _%type_scope : simpl never.