### docs: rule nitpicking

parent a0cf8fc5
 ... ... @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ Furthermore, we have the usual $\eta$ and $\beta$ laws for projections, $\lambda \end{mathpar} \paragraph{Laws for ghosts and validity.} \paragraph{Laws for resources and validity.} \begin{mathpar} \begin{array}{rMcMl} \ownM{\melt} * \ownM{\meltB} &\provesIff& \ownM{\melt \mtimes \meltB} \\ ... ... @@ -357,14 +357,14 @@ Furthermore, we have the usual$\eta$and$\beta$laws for projections,$\lambda \TRUE &\proves& \ownM{\munit} \\ \later\ownM\melt &\proves& \Exists\meltB. \ownM\meltB \land \later(\melt = \meltB) \end{array} \and \infer[valid-intro] {\melt \in \mval} {\TRUE \vdash \mval(\melt)} \and \infer[valid-elim] {\melt \notin \mval_0} {\mval(\melt) \proves \FALSE} % \and % \infer[valid-intro] % {\melt \in \mval} % {\TRUE \vdash \mval(\melt)} % \and % \infer[valid-elim] % {\melt \notin \mval_0} % {\mval(\melt) \proves \FALSE} \and \begin{array}{rMcMl} \ownM{\melt} &\proves& \mval(\melt) \\ ... ... @@ -394,6 +394,8 @@ Furthermore, we have the usual $\eta$ and $\beta$ laws for projections, $\lambda {\melt \mupd \meltsB} {\ownM\melt \proves \upd \Exists\meltB\in\meltsB. \ownM\meltB} \end{mathpar} The premise in \ruleref{upd-update} is a \emph{meta-level} side-condition that has to be proven about$a$and$B$. \ralf{Trouble is, we don't actually have$\in\$ inside the logic...} \subsection{Consistency} ... ...
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!