tactics.v 79.5 KB
Newer Older
1
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Import intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
3
From iris.bi Require Export bi.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
From iris.proofmode Require Import strings.
8
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
12
13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15
16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25
26
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
27
28
29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30
31
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
32
  end.
33
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
34

35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

44
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
46
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47

48
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
49
50
51
52
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
Class AsValid {PROP : bi} (φ : Prop) (P : PROP) := as_entails : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
54
55
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
56
Instance as_valid_valid {PROP : bi} (P : PROP) : AsValid (bi_valid P) P | 0.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
57
58
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
59
60
Instance as_valid_entails {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply bi.entails_wand. apply bi.wand_entails. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
61

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
62
63
Instance as_valid_equiv {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q).
Proof. split. apply bi.equiv_wand_iff. apply bi.wand_iff_equiv. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
64

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
(** * Start a proof *)
66
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  lazymatch goal with
68
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
  | |- let _ := _ in _ => fail
70
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
    || fail "iStartProof: not a BI entailment"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73
74
75
76
77
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
78
79
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
80

81
82
83
84
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

85
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
86
87
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
88
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
109
110
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
111
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
112
    | [] => idtac
113
114
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116
117
118
119
120
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"
         |env_cbv; apply _ ||
          let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
          fail "iClear:" H ":" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
         |go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
    end in
122
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
123

124
125
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126
127
128

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
129
  eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
130
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
131
132
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
133
134
135
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iExact:" H "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
136
137
138

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
139
    lazymatch Γ with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j|find Γ i P]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
141
142
143
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
144
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
145
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
146
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
147
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
148
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
149
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
150
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
151
  end.
152

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
153
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
154
155
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
156
    lazymatch Γ with
157
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
158
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
        eapply (tac_assumption _ _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |apply Hass
          |env_cbv; apply _ ||
           fail 1 "iAssumption:" j "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"]
       |assert (P = False%I) as Hass by reflexivity;
        apply (tac_false_destruct _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |exact Hass]
168
169
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
170
  lazymatch goal with
171
172
173
174
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
175
176
177
178
179

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
180
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
181
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
182
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183
    |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184
185
186
187
188
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not persistent"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not affine"
189
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190

191
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
192
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
193
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
194
195
196
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
197
198
199
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not affine"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
200
201
    |intros pat].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202
203
204
Tactic Notation "iEmpIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_emp_intro;
205
206
    [env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iEmpIntro: spatial context contains non-affine hypotheses"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
207

208
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
209
  iStartProof;
210
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
211
212
213
214
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
215

216
217
218
219
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
220
221
  | |- _  True => exact (bi.pure_intro _ _ I)
  | |- _  emp => iEmpIntro
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
232
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
233
234
235
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
282
    lazymatch Hs with
283
    | [] => idtac
284
285
286
287
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
288
    end
289
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

312
313
314
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
315
316
317
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
318
      [apply _ ||
319
320
321
322
323
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
324
325
326
327
328

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
329
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
330
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
331
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332
333
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
334
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
335
      |apply _
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
336
      |]
337
338
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
339
340
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
348
      [apply _ ||
349
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
350
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
351
352
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
353
354
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
355
      [apply _ ||
356
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
357
358
359
360
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
      |apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
361
362
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
363
364
365
366
367
368
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
369
370
371
372
373
374
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    apply tac_wand_intro_drop;
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
      |]
375
376
377
378
379
380
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
381
  | |-  _, ?P => fail (* actually an →, this is handled by iIntro below *)
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
393
(** * Specialize *)
394
395
396
397
398
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
399
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
400
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
401
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
402
403
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
415
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
416
  let rec go xs :=
417
    lazymatch xs with
418
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
419
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
420
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
421
422
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
423
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
424
425
426
427
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
428
429
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
430

431
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
432
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
    apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
435
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
436
437
438
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
439
440
441
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
442
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
443
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
444
445
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
446
         |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
447
448
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
449
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
450
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
451
452
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
453
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
454
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
455
456
457
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
458
         |env_reflexivity
459
         |done_if d (*goal*)
460
         |go H1 pats]
461
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
462
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
463
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
464
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
465
         |apply _ ||
466
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
467
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
468
         |apply _
469
         |env_reflexivity
470
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
471
         |go H1 pats]
472
473
474
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
475
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
476
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
477
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
478
         |solve_to_wand H1
479
480
481
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
482
          end
483
484
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
485
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
486
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
487
         |go H1 pats]
488
489
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
490
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
491
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
492
         |apply _ ||
493
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
494
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
495
         |env_reflexivity
496
497
498
499
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
500
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
501
502
503
504
505
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
506
507
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
508
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
509
510
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
511
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
512
513
514
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
515
516
517
518
519
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
520
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
521
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
522
523
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
524
525
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
526
    iSpecializeArgs H xs;
527
528
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
529
530
531
532
533
534
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
535
      let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
536
      lazymatch eval compute in
537
        (p && bool_decide (pat  []) && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
538
      | true =>
539
         (* FIXME: do something reasonable when the BI is not affine *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
540
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _ _;
541
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
542
           |iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
543
           |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
544
            let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
545
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
546
           |env_cbv; apply _ ||
547
            let Q := match goal with |- TCAnd _ (Affine ?Q) => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
548
549
550
551
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not affine"
           |env_reflexivity
           |(* goal *)]
      | false => iSpecializePat H pat
552
553
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
554
    end
555
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
556
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
557

558
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
559
560
561
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
562

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
563
(** * Pose proof *)
564
565
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
566

567
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
568
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
569
570
571
572
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
573
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
574
  let rec go t :=
575
    let tT := type of t in
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT' _) t)
      || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"
    end in
587
  go t.
588

589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
604
605
606
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
607
608
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
609
         |goal_tac ()]
610
611
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
612
         [iIntoValid t
613
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
614
         |goal_tac ()]
615
    end;
616
617
618
619
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
620
621
622
  end.

(** * Apply *)
623
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
624
625
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
626
      [env_reflexivity
627
628
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
629
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
638
639

(** * Revert *)
640
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
641
642
643
644
645
646
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
647
  iStartProof;
648
649
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
650
651
652
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
653
654

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
655
656
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
657
    | [] => idtac
658
659
660
661
662
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
663
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
664
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
665
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
666
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
667

668
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
669
  iForallRevert x1.
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
696
    constr(Hs) :=
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
710
711
712

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
713
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
714
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
715
716
717
718
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
720
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
721
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722
723
724
725
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
726

727
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
728
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
729
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
730
731
732
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
733
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
734
735
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
736
737
738

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
739
  iStartProof;
740
741
742
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743
      [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
744
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
745
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
746
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
747
748

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
749
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
750
751
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ false Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
752
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
753
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
754
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
755
756
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
757
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
758
759
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
761
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
762
763
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ true Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
765
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
766
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
767
768
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
769
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
770
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771
772
773
774

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

775
776
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
777
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
778
779
780
781
782
783
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P :=
       lazymatch goal with
       | |- IntoSep ?P _ _ => P
       | |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P
       end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
785
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
786
787
788

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(lr) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ lr H' _ _ _;
789
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
790
791
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (IntoAnd _ ?P _ _) _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
792
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
793
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
794

795
796
797
798
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
799
800
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
801
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
802
    |apply _
803
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
804

805
806
807
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
808
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
809
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
810
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
811
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
812
813
814
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
815
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
816

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
817
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
818
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
819
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
820
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
821
822
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar