tactics.v 77.8 KB
Newer Older
1
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Import intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
From iris.proofmode Require Import strings.
8
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
12
13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15
16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25
26
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
27
28
29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30
31
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
32
  end.
33
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
34

35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

44
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
46
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47

48
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
49
50
51
52
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_entails : φ  P.
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
(** * Start a proof *)
66
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  lazymatch goal with
68
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
69
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
70
71
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
    || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
73
74
75
76
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
77
78
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
79

80
81
82
83
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

84
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
85
86
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
87
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108
109
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
110
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
111
    | [] => idtac
112
113
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
114
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
115
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116
    end in
117
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
118

119
120
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
122
123

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
124
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
125
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126
127
128
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
137
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
138
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
139
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
140
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
141
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
142
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
143
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
144
  end.
145

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
146
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
147
148
149
150
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
151
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
152
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
160
161
162
163
164

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
165
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
166
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
167
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
168
    |apply _ ||
169
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
170
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
171
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
172

173
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
175
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
176
177
178
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
179
180
    |intros pat].

181
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182
  iStartProof;
183
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184
185
186
187
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
188

189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
  | |- _  True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
204
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
205
206
207
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
254
    lazymatch Hs with
255
    | [] => idtac
256
257
258
259
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
260
    end
261
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

284
285
286
287
288
289
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
  try first
    [(* (∀ _, _) *) apply tac_forall_intro
    |(* (?P → _) *) eapply tac_impl_intro_pure;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
290
291
292
293
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro:" P "not pure"
      |]
294
    |(* (?P -∗ _) *) eapply tac_wand_intro_pure;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
295
296
297
298
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro:" P "not pure"
      |]
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
    |(* ⌜∀ _, _⌝ *) apply tac_pure_forall_intro
    |(* ⌜_ → _⌝ *) apply tac_pure_impl_intro];
  intros x.

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
308
309
310
311
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- PersistentP ?P => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
312
313
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
314
315
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
316
317
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
325
      [apply _ || 
326
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
327
328
329
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
330
331
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332
      [apply _ || 
333
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
334
335
336
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
362
(** * Specialize *)
363
364
365
366
367
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
368
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
369
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
370
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
371
372
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
384
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
385
  let rec go xs :=
386
    lazymatch xs with
387
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
388
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
389
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
390
391
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
392
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
393
394
395
396
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
397
398
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
399

400
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
401
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
402
    apply _ ||
403
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
404
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
405
406
407
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
408
409
410
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
411
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
413
414
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
415
         |apply _ ||
416
417
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
418
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
419
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
420
421
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
422
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
423
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
424
425
426
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
427
         |env_reflexivity
428
         |done_if d (*goal*)
429
         |go H1 pats]
430
431
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
432
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
435
436
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
437
         |env_reflexivity
438
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
439
         |go H1 pats]
440
441
442
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
443
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
444
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
445
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
446
         |solve_to_wand H1
447
448
449
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
450
          end
451
452
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
453
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
454
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
455
         |go H1 pats]
456
457
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
458
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
459
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
460
461
462
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
463
         |env_reflexivity
464
465
466
467
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
468
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
469
470
471
472
473
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
474
475
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
476
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
477
478
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
479
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
480
481
482
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
483
484
485
486
487
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
488
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
489
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
490
491
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
492
493
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
494
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
495
496
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
505
506
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
507
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
508
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
509
510
511
           |apply _ ||
            let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
512
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
513
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
514
515
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
516
    end
517
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
518
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
519

520
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
521
522
523
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
524

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
525
(** * Pose proof *)
526
527
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
528

529
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
530
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
531
532
533
534
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
535
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
536
  let rec go t :=
537
    let tT := type of t in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
    first
      [apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT _) t)
      |lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
       | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
       |  _ : ?T, _ =>
         (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
         (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
         let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
         let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
       end] in
548
  go t.
549

550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
565
566
567
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
568
569
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
570
         |goal_tac ()]
571
572
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
573
         [iIntoValid t
574
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
575
         |goal_tac ()]
576
    end;
577
578
579
580
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
581
582
583
  end.

(** * Apply *)
584
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
585
586
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
587
      [env_reflexivity
588
589
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
590
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
599
600

(** * Revert *)
601
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
602
603
604
605
606
607
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
608
609
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
610
611
612
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
613
614

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
615
616
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
617
    | [] => idtac
618
619
620
621
622
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
623
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
624
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
625
    end in
626
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
627

628
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
629
  iForallRevert x1.
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
656
    constr(Hs) :=
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
670
671
672

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
673
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
674
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
675
676
677
678
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
679
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
680
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
681
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
682
683
684
685
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
686

687
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
688
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
689
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690
691
692
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
693
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
694
695
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
696
697
698

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
699
  iStartProof;
700
701
702
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
703
      [apply _ ||
704
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
706
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
707
708

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
709
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
710
711
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ false Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
712
    [apply _ ||
713
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
714
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
715
716
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
717
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
718
719
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
720
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
721
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722
723
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ true Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
724
    [apply _ ||
725
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
726
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
727
728
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
729
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
730
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
731
732
733
734

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

735
736
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
737
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
738
739
740
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
741
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
742
743
744

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(lr) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ lr H' _ _ _;
745
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746
747
748
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
749
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
750

751
752
753
754
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
755
756
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
757
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
758
    |apply _
759
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760

761
762
763
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
765
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
766
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
768
769
770
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
773
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
774
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
776
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
777
778
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
780
781
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783
784
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
785
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786
787
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
788
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
789
790
791
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) ","
    uconstr(x8) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
792
793
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8.

794
795
Local Tactic Notation "iExistDestruct" constr(H)
    "as" simple_intropattern(x) constr(Hx) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
796
  eapply tac_exist_destruct with H _ Hx _ _; (* (i:=H) (j:=Hx) *)
797
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
798
799
800
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExistDestruct: cannot destruct" P|];
801
802
  let y := fresh in
  intros y; eexists; split;
803
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" Hx "not fresh"
804
    |revert y; intros x].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
805

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
806
807
(** * Always *)
Tactic Notation "iAlways":=
808
  iStartProof;
809
810
  apply tac_always_intro; env_cbv
    || fail "iAlways: the goal is not an always modality".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
811
812

(** * Later *)
813
Tactic Notation "iNext" open_constr(n) :=
814
  iStartProof;
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
  let P := match goal with |- _  ?P => P end in
  try lazymatch n with 0 => fail 1 "iNext: cannot strip 0 laters" end;
  eapply (tac_next _ _ n);
    [apply _ || fail "iNext:" P "does not contain" n "laters"
    |lazymatch goal with
     | |- IntoLaterNEnvs 0 _ _ => fail "iNext:" P "does not contain laters"
     | _ => apply _
822
823
     end
    |lazy beta (* remove beta redexes caused by removing laters under binders*)].
824
825

Tactic Notation "iNext":= iNext _.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
826

827
(** * Update modality *)
828
Tactic Notation "iModIntro" :=
829
  iStartProof;
830
  eapply tac_modal_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
831
832
833
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromModal ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iModIntro:" P "not a modality"|].
834
835
836

Tactic Notation "iModCore" constr(H) :=
  eapply tac_modal_elim with _ H _ _ _ _;
837
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iMod:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
838
839
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- ElimModal ?P _ _ _ => P end in
840
     let Q := match goal with |- ElimModal _ _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
841
     fail "iMod: cannot eliminate modality " P "in" Q
842
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
843

844
(** * Basic destruct tactic *)