ltac_tactics.v 110 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics reduction.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.bi Require Export bi telescopes.
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
From stdpp Require Import namespaces.
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Export ident.

(** For most of the tactics, we want to have tight control over the order and
way in which type class inference is performed. To that end, many tactics make
use of [notypeclasses refine] and the [iSolveTC] tactic to manually invoke type
class inference.

The tactic [iSolveTC] does not use [apply _], as that often leads to issues
because it will try to solve all evars whose type is a typeclass, in
dependency order (according to Matthieu). If one fails, it aborts. However, we
generally rely on progress on the main goal to be solved to make progress
elsewhere. With [typeclasses eauto], that seems to work better.

A drawback of [typeclasses eauto] is that it is multi-success, i.e. whenever
subsequent tactics fail, it will backtrack to [typeclasses eauto] to try the
next type class instance. This is almost always undesired and leads to poor
performance and horrible error messages, so we wrap it in a [once]. *)
Ltac iSolveTC :=
  solve [once (typeclasses eauto)].

28 29 30
(** Tactic used for solving side-conditions arising from TC resolution in iMod
and iInv. *)
Ltac iSolveSideCondition :=
31
  split_and?; try solve [ fast_done | solve_ndisj ].
32

33 34 35 36 37 38 39
(** Used for printing [string]s and [ident]s. *)
Ltac pretty_ident H :=
  lazymatch H with
  | INamed ?H => H
  | ?H => H
  end.

40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
(** * Misc *)

Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
48
  let Hhyps := pm_eval (envs_dom Δ) in
49 50 51 52
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

Ltac iTypeOf H :=
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
53
  pm_eval (envs_lookup H Δ).
54

55 56 57
Ltac iBiOfGoal :=
  match goal with |- @envs_entails ?PROP _ _ => PROP end.

58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

(** * Start a proof *)
Tactic Notation "iStartProof" :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
  | |- ?φ => notypeclasses refine (as_emp_valid_2 φ _ _);
68
               [iSolveTC || fail "iStartProof: not a BI assertion"
69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
               |apply tac_adequate]
  end.

(* Same as above, with 2 differences :
   - We can specify a BI in which we want the proof to be done
   - If the goal starts with a let or a ∀, they are automatically
     introduced. *)
Tactic Notation "iStartProof" uconstr(PROP) :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- @envs_entails ?PROP' _ _ =>
    (* This cannot be shared with the other [iStartProof], because
    type_term has a non-negligeable performance impact. *)
    let x := type_term (eq_refl : @eq Type PROP PROP') in idtac

  (* We eta-expand [as_emp_valid_2], in order to make sure that
     [iStartProof PROP] works even if [PROP] is the carrier type. In
     this case, typing this expression will end up unifying PROP with
     [bi_car _], and hence trigger the canonical structures mechanism
     to find the corresponding bi. *)
  | |- ?φ => notypeclasses refine ((λ P : PROP, @as_emp_valid_2 φ _ P) _ _ _);
89
               [iSolveTC || fail "iStartProof: not a BI assertion"
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
               |apply tac_adequate]
  end.

(** * Generate a fresh identifier *)
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh :=
  (* We need to increment the environment counter using [tac_fresh].
     But because [iFresh] returns a value, we have to let bind
     [tac_fresh] wrapped under a match to force evaluation of this
     side-effect. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/46178884 *)
  let do_incr :=
      lazymatch goal with
102
      | _ => iStartProof; eapply tac_fresh; first by (pm_reflexivity)
103 104 105
      end in
  lazymatch goal with
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
106
    let n := pm_eval (env_counter Δ) in
107 108 109 110 111 112
    constr:(IAnon n)
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
113 114 115 116 117 118
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
     fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |pm_reflexivity ||
     let H2 := pretty_ident H2 in
     fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
119

120 121 122
(** Elaborated selection patterns, unlike the type [sel_pat], contains
only specific identifiers, and no wildcards like `#` (with the
exception of the pure selection pattern `%`) *)
123
Inductive esel_pat :=
124
  | ESelPure
125
  | ESelIdent : (* whether the ident is intuitionistic *) bool  ident  esel_pat.
126

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
127
Local Ltac iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ Hs :=
128 129 130
  lazymatch pat with
  | [] => eval cbv in Hs
  | SelPure :: ?pat =>  iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
131
  | SelIntuitionistic :: ?pat =>
132
    let Hs' := pm_eval (env_dom (env_intuitionistic Δ)) in
133
    let Δ' := pm_eval (envs_clear_intuitionistic Δ) in
134 135
    iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
  | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
136 137
    let Hs' := pm_eval (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
    let Δ' := pm_eval (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
138 139
    iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
  | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
140
    lazymatch pm_eval (envs_lookup_delete false H Δ) with
141
    | Some (?p,_,?Δ') =>  iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
142 143 144
    | None =>
      let H := pretty_ident H in
      fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
145 146
    end
  end.
147 148
(** Converts a selection pattern (given as a string) to a list of
elaborated selection patterns. *)
149 150 151
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
152
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
153 154 155 156
  end.

Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
157 158 159
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iClear:" H "not found"
160
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
161
     let H := pretty_ident H in
162 163 164 165
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iClear:" H ":" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
    |].

166 167 168 169 170 171
Local Ltac iClear_go Hs :=
  lazymatch Hs with
  | [] => idtac
  | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; iClear_go Hs
  | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; iClear_go Hs
  end.
172
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
173
  iStartProof; let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iClear_go Hs.
174 175 176 177

Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.

178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210
(** ** Simplification *)
Tactic Notation "iEval" tactic(t) :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_eval;
    [let x := fresh in intros x; t; unfold x; reflexivity
    |].

Local Ltac iEval_go t Hs :=
  lazymatch Hs with
  | [] => idtac
  | ESelPure :: ?Hs => fail "iEval: %: unsupported selection pattern"
  | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
    eapply tac_eval_in with _ H _ _ _;
      [pm_reflexivity || let H := pretty_ident H in fail "iEval:" H "not found"
      |let x := fresh in intros x; t; unfold x; reflexivity
      |pm_reflexivity
      |iEval_go t Hs]
  end.

Tactic Notation "iEval" tactic(t) "in" constr(Hs) :=
  iStartProof; let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iEval_go t Hs.

Tactic Notation "iSimpl" := iEval (simpl).
Tactic Notation "iSimpl" "in" constr(H) := iEval (simpl) in H.

(* It would be nice to also have an `iSsrRewrite`, however, for this we need to
pass arguments to Ssreflect's `rewrite` like `/= foo /bar` in Ltac, see:

  https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/coq-club/2018-01/msg00000.html

PMP told me (= Robbert) in person that this is not possible with the current
Ltac, but it may be possible in Ltac2. *)

211 212 213
(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
  eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
214
    [pm_reflexivity ||
215
     let H := pretty_ident H in
216
     fail "iExact:" H "not found"
217
    |iSolveTC ||
218
     let H := pretty_ident H in
219 220
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"
221
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
222
     let H := pretty_ident H in
223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231
     fail "iExact:" H "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"].

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    lazymatch Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j|find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) = Some (_, ?P) =>
232
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | pm_reflexivity]
233
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) = Some (_, ?P) =>
234
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; pm_reflexivity
235
  | |- envs_lookup_delete _ ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
236
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | pm_reflexivity]
237
  | |- envs_lookup_delete _ ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
238
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; pm_reflexivity
239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247
  end.

Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    lazymatch Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
        eapply (tac_assumption _ _ j p P);
248
          [pm_reflexivity
249
          |apply Hass
250
          |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
251 252 253
           fail 1 "iAssumption:" j "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"]
       |assert (P = False%I) as Hass by reflexivity;
        apply (tac_false_destruct _ j p P);
254
          [pm_reflexivity
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266
          |exact Hass]
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

267 268 269
(** * Making hypotheses intuitionistic or pure *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntuitionistic" constr(H) :=
  eapply tac_intuitionistic with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
270 271
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
272
     fail "iIntuitionistic:" H "not found"
273
    |iSolveTC ||
274
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
275
     fail "iIntuitionistic:" P "not persistent"
276
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
277
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
278
     fail "iIntuitionistic:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
279
    |pm_reflexivity|].
280 281 282

Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
283 284 285
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iPure:" H "not found"
286
    |iSolveTC ||
287 288
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
289
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
290 291 292 293 294 295 296
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
    |intros pat].

Tactic Notation "iEmpIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_emp_intro;
297
    [pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
298 299 300 301 302
     fail "iEmpIntro: spatial context contains non-affine hypotheses"].

Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
303
    [pm_reflexivity
304
    |iSolveTC ||
305 306 307 308 309 310
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].

(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
311
  pm_prettify;
312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320
  try match goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ True => by iPureIntro
  | |- envs_entails _ emp => iEmpIntro
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  iStartProof;
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
321
    [iSolveTC || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
322 323 324 325 326
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
327 328 329
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
330
    |iSolveTC ||
331 332 333 334 335 336 337
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

338
Local Ltac iFrameAnyIntuitionistic :=
339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378
  iStartProof;
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_intuitionistic Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  iStartProof;
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

379 380 381 382
Local Ltac iFrame_go Hs :=
  lazymatch Hs with
  | [] => idtac
  | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; iFrame_go Hs
383
  | SelIntuitionistic :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyIntuitionistic; iFrame_go Hs
384 385 386 387
  | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; iFrame_go Hs
  | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; iFrame_go Hs
  end.

388
Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
389
  let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in iFrame_go Hs.
390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  (* In the case the goal starts with an [let x := _ in _], we do not
     want to unfold x and start the proof mode. Instead, we want to
     use intros. So [iStartProof] has to be called only if [intros]
     fails *)
418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434
  (* We use [_ || _] instead of [first [..|..]] so that the error in the second
  branch propagates upwards. *)
  (
    (* introduction at the meta level *)
    intros x
  ) || (
    (* introduction in the logic *)
    iStartProof;
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
      eapply tac_forall_intro;
        [iSolveTC ||
         let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
         fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
        |pm_prettify; intros x
         (* subgoal *)]
    end).
435 436 437 438

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
439
  [(* (?Q → _) *)
440
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
441
      [iSolveTC
442
      |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
443 444 445
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
446 447 448
      |pm_reflexivity ||
       let H := pretty_ident H in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
449
      |iSolveTC
450 451
      |(* subgoal *)]
  |(* (_ -∗ _) *)
452
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
453
      [iSolveTC
454 455 456
      | pm_reflexivity ||
        let H := pretty_ident H in
        fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
457 458
      |(* subgoal *)]
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].
459 460 461 462

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
463
  [(* (?P → _) *)
464
   eapply tac_impl_intro_intuitionistic with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473
     [iSolveTC
     |iSolveTC ||
      let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
     |pm_reflexivity ||
      let H := pretty_ident H in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
     |(* subgoal *)]
  |(* (?P -∗ _) *)
474
   eapply tac_wand_intro_intuitionistic with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
475 476 477
     [iSolveTC
     |iSolveTC ||
      let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
478
      fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not intuitionistic"
479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486
     |iSolveTC ||
      let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
     |pm_reflexivity ||
      let H := pretty_ident H in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
     |(* subgoal *)]
  |fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce"].
487

488 489 490 491 492 493
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) "as" constr(p) :=
  lazymatch p with
  | true => iIntro #H
  | _ =>  iIntro H
  end.

494
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
495
  iStartProof;
496
  first
497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511
  [(* (?Q → _) *)
   eapply tac_impl_intro_drop;
     [iSolveTC
     |(* subgoal *)]
  |(* (_ -∗ _) *)
   eapply tac_wand_intro_drop;
     [iSolveTC
     |iSolveTC ||
      let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
     |(* subgoal *)]
  |(* (∀ _, _) *)
   iIntro (_)
   (* subgoal *)
  |fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce"].
512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail (* actually an →, this is handled by iIntro below *)
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- let _ := _ in _ => intro
  | |- _ =>
    iStartProof;
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
    end
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _ =>
    iStartProof;
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
    | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
    end
  end.

535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549
(** * Revert *)
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
  iStartProof;
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.

550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557
(** The tactic [iRevertHyp H with tac] reverts the hypothesis [H] and calls
[tac] with a Boolean that is [true] iff [H] was in the intuitionistic context. *)
Tactic Notation "iRevertHyp" constr(H) "with" tactic1(tac) :=
  (* Create a Boolean evar [p] to keep track of whether the hypothesis [H] was
  in the intuitionistic context. *)
  let p := fresh in evar (p : bool);
  let p' := eval unfold p in p in clear p;
  eapply tac_revert with _ H p' _;
558 559 560
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
561 562 563
    |pm_reduce; tac p'].

Tactic Notation "iRevertHyp" constr(H) := iRevertHyp H with (fun _ => idtac).
564

565 566 567 568 569 570 571
Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
    | [] => idtac
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
572
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iRevertHyp H; go Hs
573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618
    end in
  iStartProof; let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x1.
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).

619
(** * The specialize and pose proof tactics *)
620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629
Record iTrm {X As S} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : S }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697
(* The tactic [iIntoEmpValid] tactic solves a goal [bi_emp_valid Q]. The
argument [t] must be a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:

[∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), φ]

and so that we have an instance `AsValid φ Q`.

Examples of such [φ]s are

- [bi_emp_valid P], in which case [Q] should be [P]
- [P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] should be [P1 -∗ P2]
- [P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] should be [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [R] for each non-dependent argument [x_i : R].  For example, if the
original goal was [Q] and [t] has type [∀ x, P x → Q], then it generates an evar
[?x] for [x] and a subgoal [P ?x]. *)
Local Ltac iIntoEmpValid t :=
  let go_specialize t tT :=
    lazymatch tT with                (* We do not use hnf of tT, because, if
                                        entailment is not opaque, then it would
                                        unfold it. *)
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|iIntoEmpValid uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #6583. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; iIntoEmpValid (t e')
    end
  in
    (* We try two reduction tactics for the type of t before trying to
       specialize it. We first try the head normal form in order to
       unfold all the definition that could hide an entailment.  Then,
       we try the much weaker [eval cbv zeta], because entailment is
       not necessarilly opaque, and could be unfolded by [hnf].

       However, for calling type class search, we only use [cbv zeta]
       in order to make sure we do not unfold [bi_emp_valid]. *)
    let tT := type of t in
    first
      [ let tT' := eval hnf in tT in go_specialize t tT'
      | let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in go_specialize t tT'
      | let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in
        notypeclasses refine (as_emp_valid_1 tT _ _);
          [iSolveTC || fail 1 "iPoseProof: not a BI assertion"
          |exact t]].

Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCoreHyp" constr(H) "as" constr(Hnew) :=
  eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ H _ Hnew _;
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iPoseProof:" H "not found"
    |pm_reflexivity ||
     let Htmp := pretty_ident Hnew in
     fail "iPoseProof:" Hnew "not fresh"
    |].

Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCoreLem"
    constr(lem) "as" constr(Hnew) "before_tc" tactic(tac) :=
  eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Hnew _; (* (j:=H) *)
    [iIntoEmpValid lem
    |pm_reflexivity ||
     let Htmp := pretty_ident Hnew in
     fail "iPoseProof:" Hnew "not fresh"
    |tac];
  (* Solve all remaining TC premises generated by [iIntoEmpValid] *)
  try iSolveTC.

698 699 700 701 702
(** There is some hacky stuff going on here: because of Coq bug #6583, unresolved
type classes in the arguments `xs` are resolved at arbitrary moments. Tactics
like `apply`, `split` and `eexists` wrongly trigger type class search to resolve
these holes. To avoid TC being triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine`
at most places instead of `apply`. *)
703
Local Ltac iSpecializeArgs_go H xs :=
704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718
  lazymatch xs with
  | hnil => idtac
  | hcons ?x ?xs =>
     notypeclasses refine (tac_forall_specialize _ _ H _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
       [pm_reflexivity ||
        let H := pretty_ident H in
        fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
       |iSolveTC ||
        let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
        fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
       |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
        | |-  _ : ?A, _ =>
          notypeclasses refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
        end; [shelve..|pm_reflexivity|iSpecializeArgs_go H xs]]
  end.
719 720
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
  iSpecializeArgs_go H xs.
721

722
Ltac iSpecializePat_go H1 pats :=
723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
    iSolveTC ||
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P _ _ => P end in
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
  let solve_done d :=
    lazymatch d with
    | true =>
       done ||
       let Q := match goal with |- envs_entails _ ?Q => Q end in
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot solve" Q "using done"
    | false => idtac
    end in
735
  lazymatch pats with
736 737 738
    | [] => idtac
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "[IPM] The * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly.";
739
       iSpecializePat_go H1 pats
740 741 742 743
    | SIdent ?H2 [] :: ?pats =>
       (* If we not need to specialize [H2] we can avoid a lot of unncessary
       context manipulation. *)
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize false _ _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
744 745 746 747 748 749
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H2 := pretty_ident H2 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
750 751 752 753
         |iSolveTC ||
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
754
         |pm_reflexivity|iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764
    | SIdent ?H2 ?pats1 :: ?pats =>
       (* If [H2] is in the intuitionistic context, we copy it into a new
       hypothesis [Htmp], so that it can be used multiple times. *)
       let H2tmp := iFresh in
       iPoseProofCoreHyp H2 as H2tmp;
       (* Revert [H1] and re-introduce it later so that it will not be consumsed
       by [pats1]. *)
       iRevertHyp H1 with (fun p =>
         iSpecializePat_go H2tmp pats1;
           [.. (* side-conditions of [iSpecialize] *)
765
           |iIntro H1 as p]);
766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781
         (* We put the stuff below outside of the closure to get less verbose
         Ltac backtraces (which would otherwise include the whole closure). *)
         [.. (* side-conditions of [iSpecialize] *)
         |(* Use [remove_intuitionistic = true] to remove the copy [Htmp]. *)
          notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize true _ _ _ H2tmp _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
            [pm_reflexivity ||
             let H2tmp := pretty_ident H2tmp in
             fail "iSpecialize:" H2tmp "not found"
            |pm_reflexivity ||
             let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
             fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
            |iSolveTC ||
             let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
             let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
             fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
            |pm_reflexivity|iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]]
782 783
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_assert_pure _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
784 785 786
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
787 788 789 790
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |iSolveTC ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure _ ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
791
         |pm_reflexivity
792
         |solve_done d (*goal*)
793
         |iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
794 795
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GIntuitionistic false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_assert_intuitionistic _ _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
796 797 798
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
799 800 801 802 803
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |iSolveTC ||
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
         |iSolveTC
804
         |pm_reflexivity
805
         |iFrame Hs_frame; solve_done d (*goal*)
806
         |iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
807 808
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GIntuitionistic _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for intuitionistic premise"
809 810 811
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_assert _ _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
812 813 814
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
815 816
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
817
          | GSpatial => class_apply add_modal_id
818 819
          | GModal => iSolveTC || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
820
         |pm_reflexivity ||
821 822 823
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
         |iFrame Hs_frame; solve_done d (*goal*)
824
         |iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
825 826
    | SAutoFrame GIntuitionistic :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_assert_intuitionistic _ _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
827 828 829
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
830 831 832 833
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |iSolveTC ||
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
834
         |pm_reflexivity
835
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
836
         |iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
837 838
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_frame _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
839 840 841
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
842 843
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
844
          | GSpatial => class_apply add_modal_id
845 846 847 848 849 850 851
          | GModal => iSolveTC || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
         |first
            [notypeclasses refine (tac_unlock_emp _ _ _)
            |notypeclasses refine (tac_unlock_True _ _ _)
            |iFrame "∗ #"; notypeclasses refine (tac_unlock _ _ _)
            |fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"]
852 853 854 855 856
         |exact eq_refl]; iIntro H1; iSpecializePat_go H1 pats
    end.

Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
  let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in iSpecializePat_go H pats.
857 858

(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
859
intuitionistic. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(H)
    "with" open_constr(xs) open_constr(pat) "as" constr(p) :=
869
  let p := intro_pat_intuitionistic p in
870 871 872 873 874 875 876
  let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
  let H :=
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string => constr:(INamed H)
    | _ => H
    end in
  iSpecializeArgs H xs; [..|
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928
    lazymatch type of H with
    | ident =>
       (* The lemma [tac_specialize_intuitionistic_helper] allows one to use the
       whole spatial context for:
       - proving the premises of the lemma we specialize, and,
       - the remaining goal.

       We can only use if all of the following properties hold:
       - The result of the specialization is persistent.
       - No modality is eliminated.
       - If the BI is not affine, the hypothesis should be in the intuitionistic
         context.

       As an optimization, we do only use [tac_specialize_intuitionistic_helper]
       if no implications nor wands are eliminated, i.e. [pat ≠ []]. *)
       let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
       lazymatch eval compute in
         (p && bool_decide (pat  []) && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
       | true =>
          (* Check that if the BI is not affine, the hypothesis is in the
          intuitionistic context. *)
          lazymatch iTypeOf H with
          | Some (?q, _) =>
             let PROP := iBiOfGoal in
             lazymatch eval compute in (q || tc_to_bool (BiAffine PROP)) with
             | true =>
                notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_intuitionistic_helper _ _ H _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
                  [pm_reflexivity
                   (* This premise, [envs_lookup j Δ = Some (q,P)],
                   holds because [iTypeOf] succeeded *)
                  |pm_reduce; iSolveTC
                   (* This premise, [if q then TCTrue else BiAffine PROP],
                   holds because [q || TC_to_bool (BiAffine PROP)] is true *)
                  |iSpecializePat H pat;
                    [..
                    |notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_intuitionistic_helper_done _ H _ _ _);
                     pm_reflexivity]
                  |iSolveTC ||
                   let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
                   fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
                  |pm_reflexivity
                  |(* goal *)]
             | false => iSpecializePat H pat
             end
          | None =>
             let H := pretty_ident H in
             fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
          end
       | false => iSpecializePat H pat
       end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
    end].
929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945

Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
  lazymatch type of t with
  | string => iSpecializeCore t with hnil "" as p
  | ident => iSpecializeCore t with hnil "" as p
  | _ =>
    lazymatch t with
    | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore H with xs pat as p
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
    end
  end.

Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.

946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955
(** The tactic [iPoseProofCore lem as p lazy_tc tac] inserts the resource
described by [lem] into the context. The tactic takes a continuation [tac] as
its argument, which is called with a temporary fresh name [H] that refers to
the hypothesis containing [lem].

There are a couple of additional arguments:

- The argument [p] is like that of [iSpecialize]. It is a Boolean that denotes
  whether the conclusion of the specialized term [lem] is persistent.
- The argument [lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
956 957
  of [lem] should be performed before (if [lazy_tc = false]) or after (if
  [lazy_tc = true]) [tac H] is called.
958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967

Both variants of [lazy_tc] are used in other tactics that build on top of
[iPoseProofCore]:

- The tactic [iApply] uses lazy type class inference (i.e. [lazy_tc = true]),
  so that evars can first be matched against the goal before being solved by
  type class inference.
- The tactic [iDestruct] uses eager type class inference (i.e. [lazy_tc = false])
  because it may be not possible to eliminate logical connectives before all
  type class constraints have been resolved. *)
968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
976
    | ITrm _ ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
977 978
    | _ => idtac
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987
  lazymatch type of t with
  | ident => iPoseProofCoreHyp t as Htmp; spec_tac (); [..|tac Htmp]
  | _ =>
     lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
     | true =>
        iPoseProofCoreLem t as Htmp before_tc (spec_tac (); [..|tac Htmp])
     | false =>
        iPoseProofCoreLem t as Htmp before_tc (spec_tac ()); [..|tac Htmp]
     end
988 989
  end.

990
(** * The apply tactic *)
991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021
(** [iApply lem] takes an argument [lem : P₁ -∗ .. -∗ Pₙ -∗ Q] (after the
specialization patterns in [lem] have been executed), where [Q] should match
the goal, and generates new goals [P1] ... [Pₙ]. Depending on the number of
premises [n], the tactic will have the following behavior:

- If [n = 0], it will immediately solve the goal (i.e. it will not generate any
  subgoals). When working in a general BI, this means that the tactic can fail
  in case there are non-affine spatial hypotheses in the context prior to using
  the [iApply] tactic. Note that if [n = 0], the tactic behaves exactly like
  [iExact lem].
- If [n > 0] it will generate a goals [P₁] ... [Pₙ]. All spatial hypotheses
  will be transferred to the last goal, i.e. [Pₙ]; the other goals will receive
  no spatial hypotheses. If you want to control more precisely how the spatial
  hypotheses are subdivided, you should add additional introduction patterns to
  [lem]. *)

(* The helper [iApplyHypExact] takes care of the [n=0] case. It fails with level
0 if we should proceed to the [n > 0] case, and with level 1 if there is an
actual error. *)
Local Ltac iApplyHypExact H :=
  first
    [eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
       [pm_reflexivity || fail 1
       |iSolveTC || fail 1
       |pm_reduce; iSolveTC]
    |lazymatch iTypeOf H with
     | Some (_,?Q) =>
        fail 2 "iApply:" Q "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"
     end].
Local Ltac iApplyHypLoop H :=
  first
1022
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
1023
      [pm_reflexivity
1024
      |iSolveTC
1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034
      |pm_prettify (* reduce redexes created by instantiation *)]
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last iApplyHypLoop H].

Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
  first
    [iApplyHypExact H
    |iApplyHypLoop H
    |lazymatch iTypeOf H with
     | Some (_,?Q) => fail 1 "iApply: cannot apply" Q
     end].
1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_or_l;
    [iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
1046
    |(* subgoal *)].
1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_or_r;
    [iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
1053
    |(* subgoal *)].