proofmode.ref 13.4 KB
Newer Older
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  "H2" : ∀ x : nat, ⌜x = 0⌝ ∨ ⌜x = 1⌝
  --------------------------------------□
  "H" : □ (P ∨ Q)
  --------------------------------------∗
  Q ∨ P
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  "H2" : ∀ x : nat, ⌜x = 0⌝ ∨ ⌜x = 1⌝
  _ : P
  --------------------------------------□
  Q ∨ P
  
22 23 24
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
  P, Q : PROP
  Persistent0 : Persistent P
  Persistent1 : Persistent Q
  ============================
  _ : P
  _ : Q
  --------------------------------------□
  <affine> (P ∗ Q)
  
34 35 36 37 38
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "done" failed.
No applicable tactic.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
39
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
40
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HQ" not found.
41 42
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
43
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
44
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HQ" not found.
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializePat (open_constr) (constr)" and "iSpecializePat_go", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iSpecialize: cannot instantiate (∀ _ : φ, P -∗ False)%I with
P.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializePat (open_constr) (constr)" and "iSpecializePat_go", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iSpecialize: cannot instantiate (⌜φ⌝ → P -∗ False)%I with P.
62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  n, m, k : nat
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷^(S n + S m) emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷ emp
  
87 88 89 90 91
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iFrame (constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iFrame_go>" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iFrameHyp>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iFrame: cannot frame Q.
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  H : BiAffine PROP
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  _ : □ P
  _ : Q
  --------------------------------------∗
  □ P
  
103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x : nat
  l : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝
  _ : [∗ list] y ∈ (x :: l), <affine> ⌜y = y⌝
  --------------------------------------∗
  P
  
116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x : nat
  l : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝
  _ : <affine> ⌜x = x⌝ ∗ ([∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝)
  --------------------------------------∗
  P
  
129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x1, x2 : nat
  l1, l2 : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ [];l2, <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ (x1 :: l1);((x2 :: l2) ++ l2), <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝
  --------------------------------------∗
  P ∨ ([∗ list] _;_ ∈ (x1 :: l1);(x2 :: l2), True)
  
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x1, x2 : nat
  l1, l2 : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ [];l2, <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝
  _ : <affine> ⌜x1 = x2⌝
      ∗ ([∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ l1;(l2 ++ l2), <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝)
  --------------------------------------∗
  P ∨ True ∗ ([∗ list] _;_ ∈ l1;l2, True)
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  Φ : nat → nat → PROP
  x1, x2 : nat
  l1, l2 : list nat
  ============================
  _ : Φ x1 x2
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ l1;l2, Φ y1 y2
  --------------------------------------∗
  <absorb> Φ x1 x2
  
168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : □ True
  --------------------------------------∗
  True
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : emp
  --------------------------------------□
  □ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : emp
  --------------------------------------□
  □ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  mP : option PROP
  Q, R : PROP
  ============================
  "HPQ" : mP -∗? Q
  "HQR" : Q -∗ R
200
  "HP" : default emp mP
201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209
  --------------------------------------∗
  R
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  mP : option PROP
  Q, R : PROP
  ============================
210
  "HP" : default emp mP
211
  --------------------------------------∗
212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228
  default emp mP
  
"elim_mod_accessor"
     : string
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  X : Type
  E1, E2 : coPset.coPset
  α : X → PROP
  β : X → PROP
  γ : X → option PROP
  ============================
  "Hacc" : ∃ x : X, α x ∗ (β x ={E2,E1}=∗ default emp (γ x))
  --------------------------------------∗
  |={E2,E1}=> True
229
  
230 231 232 233
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
234
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
235
  ============================
236 237
  "HP" : P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
         ∗ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
238
  --------------------------------------∗
239
  True
240 241 242 243
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
244
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
245
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
246
  ============================
247 248
  _ : P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
      ∗ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
249
  --------------------------------------∗
250
  True
251 252 253 254
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
255
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
256
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
257
  ============================
258 259
  "HP" : TESTNOTATION {{ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P |
         P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P }}
260
  --------------------------------------∗
261
  True
262 263 264 265
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
266
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
267
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
268
  ============================
269 270
  _ : TESTNOTATION {{ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P |
      P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P }}
271
  --------------------------------------∗
272
  True
273
  
274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
    → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
     -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  E : coPset.coPset
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
324 325
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  ={E}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  E1, E2 : coPset.coPset
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
335 336 337
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  ={E1,E2}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
             ={E1,E2}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
338
  
339 340
"iAlways_spatial_non_empty"
     : string
341 342 343 344
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iAlways", "iModIntro" and 
"iModIntro (uconstr)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iModIntro: spatial context is non-empty.
345 346
"iDestruct_bad_name"
     : string
347 348 349 350
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
351
Tactic failure: iDestruct: "HQ" not found.
352 353
"iIntros_dup_name"
     : string
354 355 356 357
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iIntros (constr)", "iIntros_go" and
"iIntro (constr)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iIntro: "HP" not fresh.
358 359 360 361
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iIntros ( (intropattern) )",
"iIntro ( (intropattern) )" and "intros x", last call failed.
x is already used.
362 363
"iSplit_one_of_many"
     : string
364 365 366 367 368 369
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iSplitL (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iSplitL: hypotheses ["HPx"] not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iSplitL (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iSplitL: hypotheses ["HPx"] not found.
370 371
"iExact_fail"
     : string
372 373 374
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HQ" not found.
375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HQ" : Q does not match goal.
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HP"
not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine.
"iClear_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HP" not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iClear_go>" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iClearHyp>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iClear: "HP" : P not affine and the goal not absorbing.
"iSpecializeArgs_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeArgs (constr) (open_constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iSpecializeArgs_go>" and
"notypeclasses refine (uconstr)", last call failed.
In environment
PROP : sbi
P : PROP
The term "true" has type "bool" while it is expected to have type "nat".
"iStartProof_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iStartProof" and "iStartProof", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iStartProof: not a BI assertion.
"iPoseProof_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iPoseProof (open_constr) as (constr)" and
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iPoseProof: not a BI assertion.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iPoseProof (open_constr) as (constr)" and
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iRename: "H" not fresh.
"iRevert_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iRevert (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "H" not found.
"iDestruct_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iDestruct: "{HP}"
should contain exactly one proper introduction pattern.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iDestruct: (IList [[IClear (sel_patterns.SelIdent "HP")]])
invalid.
446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458
"iApply_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iApply (open_constr)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>", 
"goal_tac" (bound to
fun _ => <ssreflect_plugin::ssrtclseq@0> spec_tac ltac:(()) ; last  tac Htmp) and
"<ssreflect_plugin::ssrtclseq@0> spec_tac ltac:(()) ; last  tac Htmp", last
call failed.
Tactic failure: iApply: cannot apply P.