tactics.v 79.5 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
6
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
8
Export ident.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9 10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  option_bind
12
  beq ascii_beq string_beq positive_beq ident_beq
13 14
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
15
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
16 17
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
18
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19 20
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
21
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
22

23
(** * Misc *)
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
25
Ltac iFresh :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
26
  lazymatch goal with
27
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
28 29 30
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
31 32 33 34 35 36
     eval vm_compute in
       (IAnon (match Hs with
         | [] => 1
         | _ => 1 + foldr Pos.max 1 (omap (maybe IAnon) Hs)
         end))%positive
  | _ => constr:(IAnon 1)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37 38
  end.

39 40 41
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
42
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
43 44 45 46 47
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

48
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
49
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
50
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
51

52
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
53 54 55 56
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

57
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_valid : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
58 59
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

60 61 62 63 64
Lemma as_valid_1 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : φ  P.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.
Lemma as_valid_2 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : P  φ.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
74
(** * Start a proof *)
75
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
76
  lazymatch goal with
77
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
78 79 80
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
81 82 83 84 85
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
86 87
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
88

89 90
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
91
  | ESelIdent : bool  ident  esel_pat.
92

93
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
94 95
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
96
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
97 98 99 100
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
101
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
102 103 104
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
105 106
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
107
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
108
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
109 110 111 112
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
113
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
114 115 116
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

117 118 119 120
Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121 122
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
123
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
124
    | [] => idtac
125
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
126
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; go Hs
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
127
    end in
128
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
129

130 131
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
132 133 134

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
135
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
136
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
137 138 139
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
148
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
149
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
150
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
151
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
152
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
153
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
154
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
155
  end.
156

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
157
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
158 159 160 161
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
162
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
163
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
164 165 166
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
167
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
168 169 170
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
171 172 173 174 175

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
176
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
177
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
178
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
179
    |apply _ ||
180
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
181
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
182
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183

184
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
185
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
186
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
187 188 189
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190 191
    |intros pat].

192
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
193
  iStartProof;
194
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
195 196 197 198
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
199

200 201 202 203
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
204
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
215
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
216 217 218
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
228
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
229 230 231 232 233 234 235
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
236
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
265
    lazymatch Hs with
266
    | [] => idtac
267 268 269
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
270
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
271
    end
272
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

295 296 297
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
298
  lazymatch goal with
299
  | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
300
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
301
      [apply _ ||
302 303 304 305 306
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
307 308 309 310 311 312

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
313
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
314
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
315 316
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
317 318
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
319 320
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
321 322
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
323 324 325 326 327 328 329
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
330
      [apply _ ||
331
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332 333 334
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
335 336
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
337
      [apply _ ||
338
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
339 340 341
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
357
  | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
358 359 360 361 362
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
363 364
  | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
365 366
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
367
(** * Specialize *)
368 369 370 371 372
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
373
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
374
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
375
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
376 377
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
389
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
390
  let rec go xs :=
391
    lazymatch xs with
392
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
393
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
394
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
395 396
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
397
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
398
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
399 400 401
         |match goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _)); [|]
          (* If the existentially quantified predicate is non-dependent and [x]
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
402
          is a hole, [refine] will generate an additional goal. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
403
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _));[shelve| |]
404
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
405 406
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
407

408
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
409
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
410
    apply _ ||
411
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
413 414 415
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
416
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
417
       idtac "[IPM] The * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly.";
418
       go H1 pats
419
    | SIdent ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
420
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
421 422
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
423
         |apply _ ||
424 425
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
426
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
427
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
428 429
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
430
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
431
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
432 433 434
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
435
         |env_reflexivity
436
         |done_if d (*goal*)
437
         |go H1 pats]
438 439
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
440
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
441
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
442
         |apply _ ||
443
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
444
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
445
         |env_reflexivity
446
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
447
         |go H1 pats]
448 449 450
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
451
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
452
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
453
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
454
         |solve_to_wand H1
455 456 457
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
458
          end
459 460
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
461
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
462
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
         |go H1 pats]
464 465
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
466
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
467
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
468
         |apply _ ||
469
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
470
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
471
         |env_reflexivity
472 473 474 475
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
476
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
477 478 479 480 481
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
482 483
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
484
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
485 486
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
487
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
488 489 490
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
491 492 493 494 495
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
496
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
497
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
498
  let t :=
499 500 501 502 503
    match type of t with
    | string => constr:(ITrm (INamed t) hnil "")
    | ident => constr:(ITrm t hnil "")
    | _ => t
    end in
504 505
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
506
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
507
    let H := lazymatch type of H with string => constr:(INamed H) | _ => H end in
508
    lazymatch type of H with
509
    | ident =>
510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
518 519
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
520
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
521
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
522
           |apply _ ||
523
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
524
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
525
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
526
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
527 528
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
529
    end
530
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
531
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
532

533
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
534 535 536
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
537

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
538
(** * Pose proof *)
539 540
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
541

542
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
543
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
544 545 546 547
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
548
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
549
  let rec go t :=
550
    let tT := type of t in
551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
559 560
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"|exact t]
561
    end in
562
  go t.
563

564 565 566 567 568 569 570
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
571 572
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
573 574 575 576 577 578
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
579
    lazymatch type of t with
580
    | ident =>
581
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
582 583
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
584
         |goal_tac ()]
585 586
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
587
         [iIntoValid t
588
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
589
         |goal_tac ()]
590
    end;
591 592 593 594
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
595 596 597
  end.

(** * Apply *)
598
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
599 600
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
601
      [env_reflexivity
602 603
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
604
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
613 614

(** * Revert *)
615
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
616 617 618 619 620 621
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
622
  iStartProof;
623 624
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
625 626 627
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
628 629

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
630 631
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
632
    | [] => idtac
633 634 635
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
636
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
637
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
638
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
639
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
640
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
641
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
642

643
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
644
  iForallRevert x1.
645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
671
    constr(Hs) :=
672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
685 686 687

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
688
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
689
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690 691 692 693
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
694
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
695
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
696
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
697 698 699 700
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
701

702
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
703
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
704
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705 706 707
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
708
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
709 710
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
711 712 713

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
714
  iStartProof;
715 716 717 718
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719 720

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
721
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722
  let Hs := words Hs in
723
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
724
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
725
    [apply _ ||
726
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
727
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
728 729
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
730
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
731 732
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
733
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
734
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
735
  let Hs := words Hs in
736
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
737
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
738
    [apply _ ||
739
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
740
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
741 742
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
743
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
744
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
745 746 747 748

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

749 750
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
751
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
752 753 754
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
755
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
756

Robbert Krebbers's avatar