tactics.v 83.7 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.bi Require Export bi big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
6
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
8
Export ident.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  option_bind
12
  beq ascii_beq string_beq positive_beq ident_beq
13
14
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
15
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
16
17
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
18
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19
20
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
21
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
22

23
(** * Misc *)
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
25
Ltac iFresh :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
26
  lazymatch goal with
27
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
28
29
30
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
31
32
33
34
35
36
     eval vm_compute in
       (IAnon (match Hs with
         | [] => 1
         | _ => 1 + foldr Pos.max 1 (omap (maybe IAnon) Hs)
         end))%positive
  | _ => constr:(IAnon 1)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37
38
  end.

39
40
41
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
42
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
43
44
45
46
47
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

48
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
49
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
50
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
51

52
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
53
54
55
56
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
57
(** * Start a proof *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Tactic Notation "iStartProof" :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a Bi entailment"
               |apply tac_adequate]
  end.

(* Same as above, with 2 differences :
   - We can specify a BI in which we want the proof to be done
   - If the goal starts with a let or a ∀, they are automatically
     introduced. *)
70
Tactic Notation "iStartProof" uconstr(PROP) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
  lazymatch goal with
72
  | |- @envs_entails ?PROP' _ _ =>
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
73
74
    (* This cannot be shared with the other [iStartProof], because
    type_term has a non-negligeable performance impact. *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
75
    let x := type_term (eq_refl : @eq Type PROP PROP') in idtac
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
76

Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
77
  (* We eta-expand [as_valid_2], in order to make sure that
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
78
79
     [iStartProof PROP] works even if [PROP] is the carrier type. In
     this case, typing this expression will end up unifying PROP with
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
80
81
     [bi_car _], and hence trigger the canonical structures mechanism
     to find the corresponding bi. *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
82
  | |- ?φ => eapply (λ P : PROP, @as_valid_2 φ _ P);
83
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a Bi entailment"
84
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
85
86
  end.

87

88
89
(** * Simplification *)
Tactic Notation "iEval" tactic(t) :=
90
  iStartProof; try (eapply tac_eval; [t; reflexivity|]).
91
92
93

Tactic Notation "iSimpl" := iEval simpl.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
94
95
96
(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
97
98
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
99

100
101
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
102
  | ESelIdent : bool  ident  esel_pat.
103

104
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
105
106
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
107
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
108
109
110
111
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
112
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
113
114
115
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
116
117
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
118
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
119
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
120
121
122
123
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
124
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
125
126
127
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

128
129
Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
130
131
132
133
134
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iClear:" H ":" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
    |].
135

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
136
137
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
138
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
139
    | [] => idtac
140
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
141
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; go Hs
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
142
    end in
143
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
144

145
146
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
147
148
149

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
150
  eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
151
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
152
153
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
154
155
156
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iExact:" H "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
157
158
159

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
160
    lazymatch Γ with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
161
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j|find Γ i P]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
162
163
164
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
165
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
166
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
167
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
168
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
169
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
170
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
171
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
172
  end.
173

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
175
176
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
177
    lazymatch Γ with
178
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
179
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
        eapply (tac_assumption _ _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |apply Hass
          |env_cbv; apply _ ||
           fail 1 "iAssumption:" j "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"]
       |assert (P = False%I) as Hass by reflexivity;
        apply (tac_false_destruct _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |exact Hass]
189
190
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
191
  lazymatch goal with
192
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
193
194
195
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
196
197
198
199
200

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
201
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
203
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
204
    |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
205
206
207
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not persistent"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
208
209
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
210
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
211

212
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
213
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
214
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
215
216
217
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
218
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
219
220
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
221
222
    |intros pat].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
223
224
225
Tactic Notation "iEmpIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_emp_intro;
226
227
    [env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iEmpIntro: spatial context contains non-affine hypotheses"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
228

229
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
230
  iStartProof;
231
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
232
    [apply _ ||
233
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
234
235
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
236

237
238
239
240
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
241
242
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (bi.pure_intro _ _ I)
  | |- envs_entails _ emp => iEmpIntro
243
244
245
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
246
  iStartProof;
247
248
249
250
251
252
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
253
  iStartProof;
254
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
255
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
256
257
258
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
259
260
261
262
263
264
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
265
  iStartProof;
266
267
268
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
269
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
270
271
272
273
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
274
  iStartProof;
275
276
277
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
278
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
307
    lazymatch Hs with
308
    | [] => idtac
309
310
311
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
312
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
313
    end
314
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

337
338
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
  (* In the case the goal starts with an [let x := _ in _], we do not
     want to unfold x and start the proof mode. Instead, we want to
     use intros. So [iStartProof] has to be called only if [intros]
     fails *)
  intros x ||
    (iStartProof;
     lazymatch goal with
     | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
       eapply tac_forall_intro;
       [apply _ ||
              let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
              fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
       |lazy beta; intros x]
     end).
353
354
355
356
357

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
358
359
360
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
      [apply _
      |env_cbv; apply _ ||
361
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
362
363
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
364
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
365
      |apply _
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
366
      |]
367
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
368
369
370
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
      [apply _
      | env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
371
      |]
372
  | fail "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].
373
374
375
376
377

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
378
379
380
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
      [apply _
      |apply _ ||
381
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
382
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
383
384
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
385
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
386
387
388
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
      [ apply _
      | apply _ ||
389
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
390
391
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
      |apply _ ||
392
393
       let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
394
395
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
396
  | fail "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].
397
398
399

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  first
400
401
402
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    iStartProof; eapply tac_impl_intro_drop;
    [ apply _ | ]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
403
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
404
405
406
    iStartProof; eapply tac_wand_intro_drop;
      [ apply _
      | apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
407
408
409
       let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
      |]
410
411
412
413
414
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  lazymatch goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
415
  | |-  _, ?P => fail (* actually an →, this is handled by iIntro below *)
416
  | |-  _, _ => intro
417
418
419
420
421
422
  | |- let _ := _ in _ => intro
  | |- _ =>
    iStartProof;
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
    end
423
424
425
426
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
427
428
429
430
431
432
  | |- _ =>
    iStartProof;
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
    | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
    end
433
434
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
435
(** * Specialize *)
436
437
438
439
440
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
441
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
442
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
443
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
444
445
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

446
(*
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
447
448
449
450
451
There is some hacky stuff going on here: because of Coq bug #6583, unresolved
type classes in the arguments `xs` are resolved at arbitrary moments. Tactics
like `apply`, `split` and `eexists` wrongly trigger type class search to resolve
these holes. To avoid TC being triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine`
at most places instead of `apply`.
452
*)
453
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
454
  let rec go xs :=
455
    lazymatch xs with
456
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
457
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
458
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
459
460
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
461
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
462
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
464
465
         |match goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _)); [|]
          (* If the existentially quantified predicate is non-dependent and [x]
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
466
          is a hole, [refine] will generate an additional goal. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
467
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _));[shelve| |]
468
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
469
470
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
471

472
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
473
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
474
    apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
475
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
476
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
477
478
479
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
480
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
481
       idtac "[IPM] The * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly.";
482
       go H1 pats
483
    | SIdent ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
484
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
485
486
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
487
         |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
488
489
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
490
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
491
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
492
493
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
494
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
495
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
496
         |apply _ ||
497
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
498
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
499
         |env_reflexivity
500
         |done_if d (*goal*)
501
         |go H1 pats]
502
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
503
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
504
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
505
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
506
         |apply _ ||
507
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
508
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
509
         |apply _
510
         |env_reflexivity
511
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
512
         |go H1 pats]
513
514
515
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
516
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
517
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
518
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
519
         |solve_to_wand H1
520
         |lazymatch m with
521
          | GSpatial => apply add_modal_id
522
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
523
          end
524
525
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
526
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
527
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
528
         |go H1 pats]
529
530
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
531
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
532
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
533
         |apply _ ||
534
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
535
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
536
         |env_reflexivity
537
538
539
540
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
541
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
542
543
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
544
          | GSpatial => apply add_modal_id
545
546
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
547
548
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
549
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
550
551
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
552
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
553
554
555
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
556
557
558
559
560
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
561
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
562
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
563
  let t :=
564
565
566
567
568
    match type of t with
    | string => constr:(ITrm (INamed t) hnil "")
    | ident => constr:(ITrm t hnil "")
    | _ => t
    end in
569
570
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
571
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
572
    let H := lazymatch type of H with string => constr:(INamed H) | _ => H end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
573
    iSpecializeArgs H xs;
574
    lazymatch type of H with
575
    | ident =>
576
577
578
579
580
581
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
582
      let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
583
      lazymatch eval compute in
584
        (p && bool_decide (pat  []) && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
585
      | true =>
586
         (* FIXME: do something reasonable when the BI is not affine *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
587
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _ _;
588
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
589
           |iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
590
           |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
591
            let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
592
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
593
           |env_cbv; apply _ ||
594
            let Q := match goal with |- TCAnd _ (Affine ?Q) => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
595
596
597
598
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not affine"
           |env_reflexivity
           |(* goal *)]
      | false => iSpecializePat H pat
599
600
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
601
    end
602
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
603
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
604

605
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
606
607
608
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
609

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
610
(** * Pose proof *)
611
612
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
613

614
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
615
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
616
617
618
619
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
620
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
621
  let rec go t :=
622
    let tT := type of t in
623
624
625
626
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
627
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #6583. *)
628
629
630
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
631
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
632
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a BI assertion"|exact t]
633
    end in
634
  go t.
635

636
637
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
638
639
640
641
642
643
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called.

The tactic [iApply] uses laxy type class inference, so that evars can first be
instantiated by matching with the goal, whereas [iDestruct] does not, because
eliminations may not be performed when type classes have not been resolved.
*)
644
645
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
646
  iStartProof;
647
  let Htmp := iFresh in
648
649
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
650
651
652
653
654
655
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
656
    lazymatch type of t with
657
    | ident =>
658
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
659
660
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
661
         |goal_tac ()]
662
663
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
664
         [iIntoValid t
665
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
666
         |goal_tac ()]
667
    end;
668
669
670
671
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
672
673
674
  end.

(** * Apply *)
675
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
676
677
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
678
      [env_reflexivity
679
680
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
681
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690
691

(** * Revert *)
692
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
693
694
695
696
697
698
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
699
  iStartProof;
700
701
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
702
703
704
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705
706

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
707
708
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
709
    | [] => idtac
710
711
712
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
713
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
714
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
715
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
716
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
717
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719

720
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
721
  iForallRevert x1.
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
748
    constr(Hs) :=
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
762
763
764

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
765
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
766
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767
768
769
770
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
772
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
773
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
774
775
776
777
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
778

779
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
780
  eapply tac_or_destruct with