tactics.v 79.5 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
6
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
8
Export ident.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  option_bind
12
  beq ascii_beq string_beq positive_beq ident_beq
13
14
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
15
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
16
17
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
18
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19
20
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
21
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
22

23
(** * Misc *)
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
25
Ltac iFresh :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
26
  lazymatch goal with
27
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
28
29
30
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
31
32
33
34
35
36
     eval vm_compute in
       (IAnon (match Hs with
         | [] => 1
         | _ => 1 + foldr Pos.max 1 (omap (maybe IAnon) Hs)
         end))%positive
  | _ => constr:(IAnon 1)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37
38
  end.

39
40
41
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
42
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
43
44
45
46
47
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

48
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
49
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
50
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
51

52
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
53
54
55
56
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

57
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_valid : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
58
59
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

60
61
62
63
64
Lemma as_valid_1 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : φ  P.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.
Lemma as_valid_2 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : P  φ.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
74
(** * Start a proof *)
75
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
76
  lazymatch goal with
77
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
78
79
80
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
81
82
83
84
85
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
86
87
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
88

89
90
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
91
  | ESelIdent : bool  ident  esel_pat.
92

93
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
94
95
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
96
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
97
98
99
100
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
101
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
102
103
104
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
105
106
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
107
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
108
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
109
110
111
112
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
113
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
114
115
116
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

117
118
119
120
Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
122
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
123
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
124
    | [] => idtac
125
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
126
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; go Hs
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
127
    end in
128
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
129

130
131
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
132
133
134

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
135
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
136
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
137
138
139
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
148
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
149
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
150
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
151
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
152
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
153
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
154
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
155
  end.
156

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
157
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
158
159
160
161
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
162
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
163
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
164
165
166
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
167
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
168
169
170
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
171
172
173
174
175

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
176
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
177
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
178
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
179
    |apply _ ||
180
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
181
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
182
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183

184
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
185
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
186
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
187
188
189
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190
191
    |intros pat].

192
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
193
  iStartProof;
194
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
195
196
197
198
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
199

200
201
202
203
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
204
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
215
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
216
217
218
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
228
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
236
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
265
    lazymatch Hs with
266
    | [] => idtac
267
268
269
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
270
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
271
    end
272
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

295
296
297
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
298
  lazymatch goal with
299
  | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
300
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
301
      [apply _ ||
302
303
304
305
306
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
307
308
309
310
311
312

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
313
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
314
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
315
316
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
317
318
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
319
320
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
321
322
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
330
      [apply _ || 
331
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332
333
334
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
335
336
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
337
      [apply _ || 
338
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
339
340
341
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
357
  | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
358
359
360
361
362
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
363
364
  | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
365
366
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
367
(** * Specialize *)
368
369
370
371
372
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
373
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
374
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
375
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
376
377
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
389
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
390
  let rec go xs :=
391
    lazymatch xs with
392
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
393
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
394
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
395
396
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
397
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
398
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
399
400
401
402
403
         |match goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _)); [|]
          (* If the existentially quantified predicate is non-dependent and [x]
          is a hole, [refine] will generate an additional goal it. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _));[shelve| |]
404
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
405
406
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
407

408
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
409
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
410
    apply _ ||
411
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
413
414
415
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
416
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
417
       idtac "[IPM] The * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly.";
418
       go H1 pats
419
    | SIdent ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
420
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
421
422
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
423
         |apply _ ||
424
425
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
426
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
427
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
428
429
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
430
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
431
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
432
433
434
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
435
         |env_reflexivity
436
         |done_if d (*goal*)
437
         |go H1 pats]
438
439
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
440
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
441
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
442
         |apply _ ||
443
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
444
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
445
         |env_reflexivity
446
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
447
         |go H1 pats]
448
449
450
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
451
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
452
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
453
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
454
         |solve_to_wand H1
455
456
457
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
458
          end
459
460
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
461
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
462
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
         |go H1 pats]
464
465
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
466
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
467
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
468
         |apply _ ||
469
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
470
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
471
         |env_reflexivity
472
473
474
475
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
476
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
477
478
479
480
481
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
482
483
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
484
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
485
486
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
487
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
488
489
490
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
491
492
493
494
495
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
496
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
497
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
498
  let t :=
499
500
501
502
503
    match type of t with
    | string => constr:(ITrm (INamed t) hnil "")
    | ident => constr:(ITrm t hnil "")
    | _ => t
    end in
504
505
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
506
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
507
    let H := lazymatch type of H with string => constr:(INamed H) | _ => H end in
508
    lazymatch type of H with
509
    | ident =>
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
518
519
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
520
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
521
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
522
           |apply _ ||
523
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
524
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
525
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
526
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
527
528
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
529
    end
530
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
531
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
532

533
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
534
535
536
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
537

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
538
(** * Pose proof *)
539
540
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
541

542
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
543
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
544
545
546
547
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
548
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
549
  let rec go t :=
550
    let tT := type of t in
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
559
560
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"|exact t]
561
    end in
562
  go t.
563

564
565
566
567
568
569
570
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
571
572
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
573
574
575
576
577
578
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
579
    lazymatch type of t with
580
    | ident =>
581
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
582
583
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
584
         |goal_tac ()]
585
586
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
587
         [iIntoValid t
588
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
589
         |goal_tac ()]
590
    end;
591
592
593
594
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
595
596
597
  end.

(** * Apply *)
598
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
599
600
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
601
      [env_reflexivity
602
603
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
604
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
613
614

(** * Revert *)
615
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
616
617
618
619
620
621
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
622
  iStartProof;
623
624
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
625
626
627
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
628
629

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
630
631
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
632
    | [] => idtac
633
634
635
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
636
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
637
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
638
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
639
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
640
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
641
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
642

643
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
644
  iForallRevert x1.
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
671
    constr(Hs) :=
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
685
686
687

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
688
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
689
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690
691
692
693
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
694
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
695
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
696
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
697
698
699
700
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
701

702
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
703
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
704
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705
706
707
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
708
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
709
710
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
711
712
713

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
714
  iStartProof;
715
716
717
718
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719
720

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
721
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722
  let Hs := words Hs in
723
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
724
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
725
    [apply _ ||
726
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
727
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
728
729
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
730
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
731
732
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
733
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
734
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
735
  let Hs := words Hs in
736
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
737
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
738
    [apply _ ||
739
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
740
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
741
742
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
743
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
744
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
745
746
747
748

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

749
750
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
751
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
752
753
754
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
755
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
756

757
758
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
759
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760
761
762
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
763
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764

765
766
767
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
768
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
769
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
770
771
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
772
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
773
    |apply _
774
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775

776
777
778
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
780
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
781
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783
784
785
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
788
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
789
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
790
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=