pviewshifts.v 10.5 KB
Newer Older
1 2 3
From prelude Require Export co_pset.
From program_logic Require Export model.
From program_logic Require Import ownership wsat.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
Local Hint Extern 10 (_  _) => omega.
5 6
Local Hint Extern 100 (@eq coPset _ _) => set_solver.
Local Hint Extern 100 (_  _) => set_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
7
Local Hint Extern 10 ({_} _) =>
8 9 10
  repeat match goal with
  | H : wsat _ _ _ _ |- _ => apply wsat_valid in H; last omega
  end; solve_validN.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
11

12
Program Definition pvs {Λ Σ} (E1 E2 : coPset) (P : iProp Λ Σ) : iProp Λ Σ :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
13
  {| uPred_holds n r1 :=  rf k Ef σ,
14
       0 < k  n  (E1  E2)  Ef =  
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
15 16 17
       wsat k (E1  Ef) σ (r1  rf) 
        r2, P k r2  wsat k (E2  Ef) σ (r2  rf) |}.
Next Obligation.
18
  intros Λ Σ E1 E2 P r1 r2 n HP Hr rf k Ef σ ?? Hwsat; simpl in *.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19 20 21
  apply HP; auto. by rewrite (dist_le _ _ _ _ Hr); last lia.
Qed.
Next Obligation.
22
  intros Λ Σ E1 E2 P r1 r2 n1 n2 HP [r3 ?] Hn ? rf k Ef σ ?? Hws; setoid_subst.
23 24
  destruct (HP (r3rf) k Ef σ) as (r'&?&Hws'); rewrite ?(assoc op); auto.
  exists (r'  r3); rewrite -assoc; split; last done.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25
  apply uPred_weaken with k r'; eauto using cmra_included_l.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
26
Qed.
27 28
Arguments pvs {_ _} _ _ _%I : simpl never.
Instance: Params (@pvs) 4.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
29

30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Notation "|={ E1 , E2 }=> Q" := (pvs E1 E2 Q%I)
  (at level 199, E1, E2 at level 50, Q at level 200,
   format "|={ E1 , E2 }=>  Q") : uPred_scope.
Notation "|={ E }=> Q" := (pvs E E Q%I)
  (at level 199, E at level 50, Q at level 200,
   format "|={ E }=>  Q") : uPred_scope.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37
Section pvs.
38 39 40
Context {Λ : language} {Σ : iFunctor}.
Implicit Types P Q : iProp Λ Σ.
Implicit Types m : iGst Λ Σ.
41
Transparent uPred_holds.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
42

43
Global Instance pvs_ne E1 E2 n : Proper (dist n ==> dist n) (@pvs Λ Σ E1 E2).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
44
Proof.
45
  intros P Q HPQ; split=> n' r1 ??; simpl; split; intros HP rf k Ef σ ???;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
46
    destruct (HP rf k Ef σ) as (r2&?&?); auto;
47
    exists r2; split_and?; auto; apply HPQ; eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
48
Qed.
49
Global Instance pvs_proper E1 E2 : Proper (() ==> ()) (@pvs Λ Σ E1 E2).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
50 51
Proof. apply ne_proper, _. Qed.

52
Lemma pvs_intro E P : P  |={E}=> P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
Proof.
54
  split=> n r ? HP rf k Ef σ ???; exists r; split; last done.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
55
  apply uPred_weaken with n r; eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
56
Qed.
57
Lemma pvs_mono E1 E2 P Q : P  Q  (|={E1,E2}=> P)  (|={E1,E2}=> Q).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
58
Proof.
59 60 61
  intros HPQ; split=> n r ? HP rf k Ef σ ???.
  destruct (HP rf k Ef σ) as (r2&?&?); eauto.
  exists r2; eauto using uPred_in_entails.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
62
Qed.
63
Lemma pvs_timeless E P : TimelessP P  ( P)  (|={E}=> P).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
64
Proof.
65 66
  rewrite uPred.timelessP_spec=> HP.
  split=>-[|n] r ? HP' rf k Ef σ ???; first lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  exists r; split; last done.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
68
  apply HP, uPred_weaken with n r; eauto using cmra_validN_le.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69 70
Qed.
Lemma pvs_trans E1 E2 E3 P :
71
  E2  E1  E3  (|={E1,E2}=> |={E2,E3}=> P)  (|={E1,E3}=> P).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
Proof.
73
  intros ?; split=> n r1 ? HP1 rf k Ef σ ???.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
74 75 76
  destruct (HP1 rf k Ef σ) as (r2&HP2&?); auto.
Qed.
Lemma pvs_mask_frame E1 E2 Ef P :
77
  Ef  (E1  E2) =   (|={E1,E2}=> P)  (|={E1  Ef,E2  Ef}=> P).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
78
Proof.
79
  intros ?; split=> n r ? HP rf k Ef' σ ???.
80 81
  destruct (HP rf k (EfEf') σ) as (r'&?&?); rewrite ?(assoc_L _); eauto.
  by exists r'; rewrite -(assoc_L _).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
82
Qed.
83
Lemma pvs_frame_r E1 E2 P Q : ((|={E1,E2}=> P)  Q)  (|={E1,E2}=> P  Q).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
84
Proof.
85
  split; intros n r ? (r1&r2&Hr&HP&?) rf k Ef σ ???.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
86
  destruct (HP (r2  rf) k Ef σ) as (r'&?&?); eauto.
87 88
  { by rewrite assoc -(dist_le _ _ _ _ Hr); last lia. }
  exists (r'  r2); split; last by rewrite -assoc.
89
  exists r', r2; split_and?; auto; apply uPred_weaken with n r2; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
90
Qed.
91
Lemma pvs_openI i P : ownI i P  (|={{[i]},}=>  P).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
92
Proof.
93
  split=> -[|n] r ? Hinv rf [|k] Ef σ ???; try lia.
94
  apply ownI_spec in Hinv; last auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
95 96
  destruct (wsat_open k Ef σ (r  rf) i P) as (rP&?&?); auto.
  { rewrite lookup_wld_op_l ?Hinv; eauto; apply dist_le with (S n); eauto. }
97
  exists (rP  r); split; last by rewrite (left_id_L _ _) -assoc.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
98
  eapply uPred_weaken with (S k) rP; eauto using cmra_included_l.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
99
Qed.
100
Lemma pvs_closeI i P : (ownI i P   P)  (|={,{[i]}}=> True).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
101
Proof.
102 103
  split=> -[|n] r ? [? HP] rf [|k] Ef σ ? HE ?; try lia.
  exists ; split; [done|].
104
  rewrite left_id; apply wsat_close with P r.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
105
  - apply ownI_spec, uPred_weaken with (S n) r; auto.
106
  - set_solver +HE.
107
  - by rewrite -(left_id_L  () Ef).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108
  - apply uPred_weaken with n r; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
109
Qed.
110
Lemma pvs_ownG_updateP E m (P : iGst Λ Σ  Prop) :
111
  m ~~>: P  ownG m  (|={E}=>  m',  P m'  ownG m').
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
112
Proof.
113 114
  intros Hup%option_updateP'.
  split=> -[|n] r ? /ownG_spec Hinv rf [|k] Ef σ ???; try lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115
  destruct (wsat_update_gst k (E  Ef) σ r rf (Some m) P) as (m'&?&?); eauto.
116
  { apply cmra_includedN_le with (S n); auto. }
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
117 118
  by exists (update_gst m' r); split; [exists m'; split; [|apply ownG_spec]|].
Qed.
119
Lemma pvs_ownG_updateP_empty `{Empty (iGst Λ Σ), !CMRAIdentity (iGst Λ Σ)}
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
120
    E (P : iGst Λ Σ  Prop) :
121
   ~~>: P  True  (|={E}=>  m',  P m'  ownG m').
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
122
Proof.
123
  intros Hup; split=> -[|n] r ? _ rf [|k] Ef σ ???; try lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
124 125 126 127 128 129
  destruct (wsat_update_gst k (E  Ef) σ r rf  P) as (m'&?&?); eauto.
  { apply cmra_empty_leastN. }
  { apply cmra_updateP_compose_l with (Some ), option_updateP with P;
      auto using option_update_None. }
  by exists (update_gst m' r); split; [exists m'; split; [|apply ownG_spec]|].
Qed.
130
Lemma pvs_allocI E P : ¬set_finite E   P  (|={E}=>  i,  (i  E)  ownI i P).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
131
Proof.
132
  intros ?; split=> -[|n] r ? HP rf [|k] Ef σ ???; try lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
133
  destruct (wsat_alloc k E Ef σ rf P r) as (i&?&?&?); auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
134
  { apply uPred_weaken with n r; eauto. }
135
  exists (Res {[ i := to_agree (Next (iProp_unfold P)) ]}  ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
136 137 138
  by split; [by exists i; split; rewrite /uPred_holds /=|].
Qed.

139
(** * Derived rules *)
140
Opaque uPred_holds.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
141
Import uPred.
142
Global Instance pvs_mono' E1 E2 : Proper (() ==> ()) (@pvs Λ Σ E1 E2).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
143
Proof. intros P Q; apply pvs_mono. Qed.
144 145 146
Global Instance pvs_flip_mono' E1 E2 :
  Proper (flip () ==> flip ()) (@pvs Λ Σ E1 E2).
Proof. intros P Q; apply pvs_mono. Qed.
147
Lemma pvs_trans' E P : (|={E}=> |={E}=> P)  (|={E}=> P).
148
Proof. apply pvs_trans; set_solver. Qed.
149
Lemma pvs_strip_pvs E P Q : P  (|={E}=> Q)  (|={E}=> P)  (|={E}=> Q).
150
Proof. move=>->. by rewrite pvs_trans'. Qed.
151
Lemma pvs_frame_l E1 E2 P Q : (P  |={E1,E2}=> Q)  (|={E1,E2}=> P  Q).
152
Proof. rewrite !(comm _ P); apply pvs_frame_r. Qed.
153
Lemma pvs_always_l E1 E2 P Q `{!AlwaysStable P} :
154
  (P  |={E1,E2}=> Q)  (|={E1,E2}=> P  Q).
155
Proof. by rewrite !always_and_sep_l pvs_frame_l. Qed.
156
Lemma pvs_always_r E1 E2 P Q `{!AlwaysStable Q} :
157
  ((|={E1,E2}=> P)  Q)  (|={E1,E2}=> P  Q).
158
Proof. by rewrite !always_and_sep_r pvs_frame_r. Qed.
159
Lemma pvs_impl_l E1 E2 P Q : ( (P  Q)  (|={E1,E2}=> P))  (|={E1,E2}=> Q).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
160
Proof. by rewrite pvs_always_l always_elim impl_elim_l. Qed.
161
Lemma pvs_impl_r E1 E2 P Q : ((|={E1,E2}=> P)   (P  Q))  (|={E1,E2}=> Q).
162
Proof. by rewrite comm pvs_impl_l. Qed.
163
Lemma pvs_wand_l E1 E2 P Q R :
164
  P  (|={E1,E2}=> Q)  ((Q - R)  P)  (|={E1,E2}=> R).
165
Proof. intros ->. rewrite pvs_frame_l. apply pvs_mono, wand_elim_l. Qed.
166
Lemma pvs_wand_r E1 E2 P Q R :
167
  P  (|={E1,E2}=> Q)  (P  (Q - R))  (|={E1,E2}=> R).
168
Proof. rewrite comm. apply pvs_wand_l. Qed.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
169 170 171
Lemma pvs_sep E P Q:
  ((|={E}=> P)  (|={E}=> Q))  (|={E}=> P  Q).
Proof. rewrite pvs_frame_r pvs_frame_l pvs_trans //. set_solver. Qed.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
172

173
Lemma pvs_mask_frame' E1 E1' E2 E2' P :
174 175
  E1'  E1  E2'  E2  E1  E1' = E2  E2' 
  (|={E1',E2'}=> P)  (|={E1,E2}=> P).
176
Proof.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
177
  intros HE1 HE2 HEE.
178
  rewrite (pvs_mask_frame _ _ (E1  E1')); last set_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
179
  by rewrite {2}HEE -!union_difference_L.
180
Qed.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
181 182 183

Lemma pvs_mask_frame_mono E1 E1' E2 E2' P Q :
  E1'  E1  E2'  E2  E1  E1' = E2  E2' 
184
  P  Q  (|={E1',E2'}=> P)  (|={E1,E2}=> Q).
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
185 186
Proof. intros HE1 HE2 HEE ->. by apply pvs_mask_frame'. Qed.

187
(** It should be possible to give a stronger version of this rule
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
188 189
   that does not force the conclusion view shift to have twice the
   same mask. However, even expressing the side-conditions on the
190
   mask becomes really ugly then, and we have not found an instance
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
191
   where that would be useful. *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
192
Lemma pvs_trans3 E1 E2 Q :
193
  E2  E1  (|={E1,E2}=> |={E2}=> |={E2,E1}=> Q)  (|={E1}=> Q).
194
Proof. intros HE. rewrite !pvs_trans; set_solver. Qed.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
195

196
Lemma pvs_mask_weaken E1 E2 P : E1  E2  (|={E1}=> P)  (|={E2}=> P).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
197
Proof. auto using pvs_mask_frame'. Qed.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
198

199
Lemma pvs_ownG_update E m m' : m ~~> m'  ownG m  (|={E}=> ownG m').
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
200
Proof.
201
  intros; rewrite (pvs_ownG_updateP E _ (m' =)); last by apply cmra_update_updateP.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202 203 204
  by apply pvs_mono, uPred.exist_elim=> m''; apply uPred.const_elim_l=> ->.
Qed.
End pvs.
205 206 207 208 209 210

(** * Frame Shift Assertions. *)
(* Yes, the name is horrible...
   Frame Shift Assertions take a mask and a predicate over some type (that's
   their "postcondition"). They support weakening the mask, framing resources
   into the postcondition, and composition witn mask-changing view shifts. *)
211 212
Notation FSA Λ Σ A := (coPset  (A  iProp Λ Σ)  iProp Λ Σ).
Class FrameShiftAssertion {Λ Σ A} (fsaV : Prop) (fsa : FSA Λ Σ A) := {
213 214
  fsa_mask_frame_mono E1 E2 Φ Ψ :
    E1  E2  ( a, Φ a  Ψ a)  fsa E1 Φ  fsa E2 Ψ;
215
  fsa_trans3 E Φ : (|={E}=> fsa E (λ a, |={E}=> Φ a))  fsa E Φ;
216
  fsa_open_close E1 E2 Φ :
217
    fsaV  E2  E1  (|={E1,E2}=> fsa E2 (λ a, |={E2,E1}=> Φ a))  fsa E1 Φ;
218
  fsa_frame_r E P Φ : (fsa E Φ  P)  fsa E (λ a, Φ a  P)
219 220
}.

221 222
Section fsa.
Context {Λ Σ A} (fsa : FSA Λ Σ A) `{!FrameShiftAssertion fsaV fsa}.
223
Implicit Types Φ Ψ : A  iProp Λ Σ.
224

225
Lemma fsa_mono E Φ Ψ : ( a, Φ a  Ψ a)  fsa E Φ  fsa E Ψ.
226
Proof. apply fsa_mask_frame_mono; auto. Qed.
227
Lemma fsa_mask_weaken E1 E2 Φ : E1  E2  fsa E1 Φ  fsa E2 Φ.
228
Proof. intros. apply fsa_mask_frame_mono; auto. Qed.
229
Lemma fsa_frame_l E P Φ : (P  fsa E Φ)  fsa E (λ a, P  Φ a).
230
Proof. rewrite comm fsa_frame_r. apply fsa_mono=>a. by rewrite comm. Qed.
231
Lemma fsa_strip_pvs E P Φ : P  fsa E Φ  (|={E}=> P)  fsa E Φ.
232
Proof.
233 234
  move=>->. rewrite -{2}fsa_trans3.
  apply pvs_mono, fsa_mono=>a; apply pvs_intro.
235
Qed.
236
Lemma fsa_mono_pvs E Φ Ψ : ( a, Φ a  (|={E}=> Ψ a))  fsa E Φ  fsa E Ψ.
237
Proof. intros. rewrite -[fsa E Ψ]fsa_trans3 -pvs_intro. by apply fsa_mono. Qed.
238 239
End fsa.

240
Definition pvs_fsa {Λ Σ} : FSA Λ Σ () := λ E Φ, (|={E}=> Φ ())%I.
241
Instance pvs_fsa_prf {Λ Σ} : FrameShiftAssertion True (@pvs_fsa Λ Σ).
242
Proof.
243 244
  rewrite /pvs_fsa.
  split; auto using pvs_mask_frame_mono, pvs_trans3, pvs_frame_r.
245
Qed.