tactics.v 79.7 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
6
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
8
Export ident.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  option_bind
12
  beq ascii_beq string_beq positive_beq ident_beq
13
14
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
15
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
16
17
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
18
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19
20
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
21
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
22

23
(** * Misc *)
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
25
Ltac iFresh :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
26
  lazymatch goal with
27
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
28
29
30
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
31
32
33
34
35
36
     eval vm_compute in
       (IAnon (match Hs with
         | [] => 1
         | _ => 1 + foldr Pos.max 1 (omap (maybe IAnon) Hs)
         end))%positive
  | _ => constr:(IAnon 1)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37
38
  end.

39
40
41
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
42
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
43
44
45
46
47
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

48
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
49
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
50
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
51

52
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
53
54
55
56
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

57
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_valid : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
58
59
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

60
61
62
63
64
Lemma as_valid_1 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : φ  P.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.
Lemma as_valid_2 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : P  φ.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
74
(** * Start a proof *)
75
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
76
  lazymatch goal with
77
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
78
79
80
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
81
82
  end.

83
84
85
86
87
88
89
(** * Simplification *)
Tactic Notation "iEval" tactic(t) :=
  try iStartProof;
  try (eapply tac_eval; [t; reflexivity|]).

Tactic Notation "iSimpl" := iEval simpl.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
90
91
92
(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
93
94
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
95

96
97
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
98
  | ESelIdent : bool  ident  esel_pat.
99

100
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
101
102
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
103
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
104
105
106
107
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
108
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
109
110
111
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
112
113
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
114
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
115
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
116
117
118
119
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
120
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
121
122
123
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

124
125
126
127
Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
128
129
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
130
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
131
    | [] => idtac
132
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
133
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; go Hs
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
134
    end in
135
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
136

137
138
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
139
140
141

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
142
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
143
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
144
145
146
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
155
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
156
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
157
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
158
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
159
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
160
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
161
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
162
  end.
163

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
164
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
165
166
167
168
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
169
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
170
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
171
172
173
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
174
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
175
176
177
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
178
179
180
181
182

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
183
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
185
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
186
    |apply _ ||
187
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
188
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
189
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190

191
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
192
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
193
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
194
195
196
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
197
198
    |intros pat].

199
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
200
  iStartProof;
201
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202
203
204
205
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
206

207
208
209
210
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
211
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
222
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
223
224
225
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
235
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
243
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
272
    lazymatch Hs with
273
    | [] => idtac
274
275
276
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
277
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
278
    end
279
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

302
303
304
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
305
  lazymatch goal with
306
  | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
307
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
308
      [apply _ ||
309
310
311
312
313
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
314
315
316
317
318
319

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
320
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
321
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
322
323
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
324
325
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
326
327
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
328
329
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
337
      [apply _ ||
338
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
339
340
341
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
342
343
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
344
      [apply _ ||
345
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
346
347
348
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
364
  | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
365
366
367
368
369
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
370
371
  | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
372
373
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
374
(** * Specialize *)
375
376
377
378
379
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
380
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
381
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
382
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
383
384
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

385
(*
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
386
387
388
389
390
There is some hacky stuff going on here: because of Coq bug #6583, unresolved
type classes in the arguments `xs` are resolved at arbitrary moments. Tactics
like `apply`, `split` and `eexists` wrongly trigger type class search to resolve
these holes. To avoid TC being triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine`
at most places instead of `apply`.
391
*)
392
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
393
  let rec go xs :=
394
    lazymatch xs with
395
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
396
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
397
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
398
399
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
400
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
401
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
402
403
404
         |match goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _)); [|]
          (* If the existentially quantified predicate is non-dependent and [x]
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
405
          is a hole, [refine] will generate an additional goal. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
406
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _));[shelve| |]
407
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
408
409
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
410

411
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
413
    apply _ ||
414
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
415
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
416
417
418
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
419
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
420
       idtac "[IPM] The * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly.";
421
       go H1 pats
422
    | SIdent ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
423
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
424
425
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
426
         |apply _ ||
427
428
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
429
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
430
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
431
432
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
433
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
434
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
435
436
437
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
438
         |env_reflexivity
439
         |done_if d (*goal*)
440
         |go H1 pats]
441
442
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
443
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
444
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
445
         |apply _ ||
446
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
447
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
448
         |env_reflexivity
449
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
450
         |go H1 pats]
451
452
453
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
454
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
455
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
456
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
457
         |solve_to_wand H1
458
459
460
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
461
          end
462
463
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
464
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
465
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
466
         |go H1 pats]
467
468
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
469
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
470
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
471
         |apply _ ||
472
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
473
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
474
         |env_reflexivity
475
476
477
478
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
479
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
480
481
482
483
484
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
485
486
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
487
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
488
489
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
490
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
491
492
493
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
494
495
496
497
498
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
499
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
500
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
501
  let t :=
502
503
504
505
506
    match type of t with
    | string => constr:(ITrm (INamed t) hnil "")
    | ident => constr:(ITrm t hnil "")
    | _ => t
    end in
507
508
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
509
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
510
    let H := lazymatch type of H with string => constr:(INamed H) | _ => H end in
511
    lazymatch type of H with
512
    | ident =>
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
521
522
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
523
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
524
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
525
           |apply _ ||
526
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
527
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
528
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
529
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
530
531
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
532
    end
533
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
534
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
535

536
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
537
538
539
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
540

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
541
(** * Pose proof *)
542
543
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
544

545
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
546
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
547
548
549
550
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
551
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
552
  let rec go t :=
553
    let tT := type of t in
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
562
563
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"|exact t]
564
    end in
565
  go t.
566

567
568
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
569
570
571
572
573
574
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called.

The tactic [iApply] uses laxy type class inference, so that evars can first be
instantiated by matching with the goal, whereas [iDestruct] does not, because
eliminations may not be performed when type classes have not been resolved.
*)
575
576
577
578
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
579
580
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
581
582
583
584
585
586
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
587
    lazymatch type of t with
588
    | ident =>
589
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
590
591
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
592
         |goal_tac ()]
593
594
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
595
         [iIntoValid t
596
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
597
         |goal_tac ()]
598
    end;
599
600
601
602
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
603
604
605
  end.

(** * Apply *)
606
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
607
608
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
609
      [env_reflexivity
610
611
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
612
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
621
622

(** * Revert *)
623
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
624
625
626
627
628
629
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
630
  iStartProof;
631
632
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
633
634
635
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
636
637

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
638
639
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
640
    | [] => idtac
641
642
643
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
644
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
645
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
646
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
647
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
648
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
649
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
650

651
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
652
  iForallRevert x1.
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
679
    constr(Hs) :=
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
693
694
695

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
696
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
697
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
698
699
700
701
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
702
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
703
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
704
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705
706
707
708
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
709

710
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
711
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
712
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
713
714
715
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
716
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
717
718
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719
720
721

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
722
  iStartProof;
723
724
725
726
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
727
728

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
729
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
730
  let Hs := words Hs in
731
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
732
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
733
    [apply _ ||
734
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
735
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
736
737
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
738
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
739
740
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
741
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
742
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743
  let Hs := words Hs in
744
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
745
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746
    [apply _ ||
747
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
748
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
749
750
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
751
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
752
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
753
754
755
756

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

757
758
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
759
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760
761
762
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
763
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
764

765
766
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
767
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
768
769
770
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
771
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772

773
774
775
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
776
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
777
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
778
779
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
780
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
781
    |apply _
782
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783

784
785
786
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
788
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
789
  iStartProof;