tactics.v 79.8 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
3
From iris.bi Require Export bi.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
8
9

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
10
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
11
12
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
13
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
14
15
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
16
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
17
18
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
19
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
20

21
(** * Misc *)
22
23
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
24
25
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
26
27
28
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
29
30
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
31
  end.
32
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
33

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

43
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
44
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
45
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
46

47
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
48
49
50
51
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
52
Class AsValid {PROP : bi} (φ : Prop) (P : PROP) := as_entails : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
54
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
55
Instance as_valid_valid {PROP : bi} (P : PROP) : AsValid (bi_valid P) P | 0.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
56
57
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
58
59
Instance as_valid_entails {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply bi.entails_wand. apply bi.wand_entails. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
60

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
61
62
Instance as_valid_equiv {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q).
Proof. split. apply bi.equiv_wand_iff. apply bi.wand_iff_equiv. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
63

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
64
(** * Start a proof *)
65
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
66
  lazymatch goal with
67
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
68
  | |- let _ := _ in _ => fail
69
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
70
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
    || fail "iStartProof: not a BI entailment"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
73
74
75
76
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
77
78
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
79

80
81
82
83
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

84
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
85
86
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
87
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108
109
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
110
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
111
    | [] => idtac
112
113
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
114
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115
116
117
118
119
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"
         |env_cbv; apply _ ||
          let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
          fail "iClear:" H ":" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
         |go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
120
    end in
121
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
122

123
124
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
125
126
127

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
128
  eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
129
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
130
131
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
132
133
134
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iExact:" H "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
135
136
137

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
138
    lazymatch Γ with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
139
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j|find Γ i P]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140
141
142
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
143
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
144
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
145
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
146
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
147
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
148
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
149
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
150
  end.
151

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
152
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
153
154
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
155
    lazymatch Γ with
156
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
157
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
        eapply (tac_assumption _ _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |apply Hass
          |env_cbv; apply _ ||
           fail 1 "iAssumption:" j "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"]
       |assert (P = False%I) as Hass by reflexivity;
        apply (tac_false_destruct _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |exact Hass]
167
168
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
169
  lazymatch goal with
170
171
172
173
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174
175
176
177
178

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
179
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
180
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
181
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182
    |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183
184
185
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not persistent"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
186
187
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
188
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
189

190
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
191
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
192
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
193
194
195
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
196
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
197
198
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
199
200
    |intros pat].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
201
202
203
Tactic Notation "iEmpIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_emp_intro;
204
205
    [env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iEmpIntro: spatial context contains non-affine hypotheses"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
206

207
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
208
  iStartProof;
209
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
210
211
212
213
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
214

215
216
217
218
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
219
220
  | |- _  True => exact (bi.pure_intro _ _ I)
  | |- _  emp => iEmpIntro
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
231
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
232
233
234
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
281
    lazymatch Hs with
282
    | [] => idtac
283
284
285
286
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
287
    end
288
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

311
312
313
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
314
315
316
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
317
      [apply _ ||
318
319
320
321
322
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
323
324
325
326
327

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
328
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
329
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
330
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
331
332
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
333
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
334
      |apply _
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
335
      |]
336
337
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
338
339
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
340
  | fail "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].
341
342
343
344
345
346

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
347
      [apply _ ||
348
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
349
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
350
351
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
352
353
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
354
      [apply _ ||
355
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
356
357
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
      |apply _ ||
358
359
       let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
360
361
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
362
  | fail "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].
363
364
365
366
367

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
368
369
370
371
372
373
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    apply tac_wand_intro_drop;
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
      |]
374
375
376
377
378
379
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
380
  | |-  _, ?P => fail (* actually an →, this is handled by iIntro below *)
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
392
(** * Specialize *)
393
394
395
396
397
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
398
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
399
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
400
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
401
402
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
414
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
415
  let rec go xs :=
416
    lazymatch xs with
417
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
418
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
419
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
420
421
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
422
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
423
424
425
426
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
427
428
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
429

430
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
431
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
432
    apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
435
436
437
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
438
439
440
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
441
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
442
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
443
444
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
445
         |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
446
447
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
448
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
449
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
450
451
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
452
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
453
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
454
455
456
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
457
         |env_reflexivity
458
         |done_if d (*goal*)
459
         |go H1 pats]
460
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
461
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
462
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
464
         |apply _ ||
465
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
466
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
467
         |apply _
468
         |env_reflexivity
469
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
470
         |go H1 pats]
471
472
473
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
474
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
475
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
476
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
477
         |solve_to_wand H1
478
479
480
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
481
          end
482
483
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
484
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
485
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
486
         |go H1 pats]
487
488
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
489
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
490
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
491
         |apply _ ||
492
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
493
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
494
         |env_reflexivity
495
496
497
498
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
499
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
500
501
502
503
504
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
505
506
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
507
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
508
509
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
510
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
511
512
513
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
514
515
516
517
518
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
519
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
520
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
521
522
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
523
524
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
525
    iSpecializeArgs H xs;
526
527
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
528
529
530
531
532
533
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
534
      let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
535
      lazymatch eval compute in
536
        (p && bool_decide (pat  []) && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
537
      | true =>
538
         (* FIXME: do something reasonable when the BI is not affine *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
539
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _ _;
540
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
541
           |iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
542
           |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
543
            let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
544
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
545
           |env_cbv; apply _ ||
546
            let Q := match goal with |- TCAnd _ (Affine ?Q) => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
547
548
549
550
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not affine"
           |env_reflexivity
           |(* goal *)]
      | false => iSpecializePat H pat
551
552
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
553
    end
554
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
555
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
556

557
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
558
559
560
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
561

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
562
(** * Pose proof *)
563
564
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
565

566
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
567
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
568
569
570
571
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
572
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
573
  let rec go t :=
574
    let tT := type of t in
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT' _) t)
      || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"
    end in
586
  go t.
587

588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
603
604
605
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
606
607
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
608
         |goal_tac ()]
609
610
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
611
         [iIntoValid t
612
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
613
         |goal_tac ()]
614
    end;
615
616
617
618
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
619
620
621
  end.

(** * Apply *)
622
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
623
624
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
625
      [env_reflexivity
626
627
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
628
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
637
638

(** * Revert *)
639
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
640
641
642
643
644
645
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
646
  iStartProof;
647
648
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
649
650
651
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
652
653

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
654
655
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
656
    | [] => idtac
657
658
659
660
661
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
662
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
663
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
664
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
665
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
666

667
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
668
  iForallRevert x1.
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
695
    constr(Hs) :=
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
709
710
711

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
712
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
713
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
714
715
716
717
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
719
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
720
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
721
722
723
724
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
725

726
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
727
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
728
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
729
730
731
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
732
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
733
734
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
735
736
737

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
738
  iStartProof;
739
740
741
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
742
      [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
744
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
745
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746
747

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
748
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
749
  let Hs := words Hs in
750
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
751
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
752
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
753
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
754
755
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
756
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
757
758
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
759
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
760
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761
  let Hs := words Hs in
762
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
763
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
765
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
766
767
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
768
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
769
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
770
771
772
773

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

774
775
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
776
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
777
778
779
780
781
782
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P :=
       lazymatch goal with
       | |- IntoSep ?P _ _ => P
       | |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P
       end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
784
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
785

786
787
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
788
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
789
790
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (IntoAnd _ ?P _ _) _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
791
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
792
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
793

794
795
796
797
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
798
799
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
800
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
801
    |apply _
802
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
803

804
805
806
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
807
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
808
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
809
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
810
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
811
812
813
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
814
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].