Skip to content

GitLab

C
c
Commit d22c6803 authored by Dan Frumin's avatar Dan Frumin
Browse files
Options

Simplify the tactics and clean up the examples

parent 0f6567ec
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 67 additions and 86 deletions
theories/c_translation/derived.v
View file @ d22c6803
......@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ Section Derived.
- iIntros (? w) "-> H". eauto with iFrame.
Qed.
Ltac awp_load_ret l w := iApply (a_load_ret l w); iFrame; eauto.
Ltac awp_load_ret l := iApply (a_load_ret l); iFrame; eauto.
Ltac awp_ret_value := iApply awp_ret; iApply wp_value; eauto.
Ltac awp_alloc_ret w r h := iApply (a_alloc_ret w); iIntros (r) h; awp_lam.
Ltac awp_alloc_ret r h := iApply a_alloc_ret; iIntros (r) h; awp_lam.
Lemma awp_bin_op_load_load op (l r : loc) (v1 v2: val) R Φ :
l ↦U v1 -∗ r ↦U v2 -∗
......@@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ Section Derived.
iApply (a_bin_op_spec _ _
(λ x, ⌜x = v1⌝ ∧ l ↦U v1 )%I
(λ x, ⌜x = v2⌝ ∧ r ↦U v2)%I with "[Hl] [Hr] [HΦ]").
- awp_load_ret l v1.
- awp_load_ret r v2.
- awp_load_ret l.
- awp_load_ret r.
- iIntros (??) "[-> Hl] [-> Hr]".
iApply ("HΦ" with "[$Hl] [$Hr]").
Qed.
End Derived.
Ltac awp_load_ret l w := iApply (a_load_ret l w); iFrame; eauto.
Ltac awp_load_ret l := iApply (a_load_ret l); iFrame; eauto.
Ltac awp_ret_value := iApply awp_ret; iApply wp_value; eauto.
Ltac awp_alloc_ret w r h := iApply (a_alloc_ret w); iIntros (r) h; awp_lam.
Ltac awp_alloc_ret r h := iApply a_alloc_ret; iIntros (r) h; awp_lam.
theories/tests/fact.v
View file @ d22c6803
......@@ -4,33 +4,26 @@ From iris.algebra Require Import frac auth.
From iris_c.lib Require Import locking_heap mset flock U.
From iris_c.c_translation Require Import proofmode translation derived.
Definition incr : val := λ: "l",
a_store (a_ret "l") (a_bin_op PlusOp (a_load (a_ret "l")) (a_ret #1)).
Section factorial.
Definition factorial_body : val := λ: "n" "c" "r",
a_while
(λ:<>, a_bin_op LtOp (a_load (a_ret "c")) (a_ret "n"))
(λ:<>, incr "c" ;;;;
a_store (a_ret "r")
(a_bin_op MultOp (a_load (a_ret "r")) (a_load (a_ret "c")))).
Definition incr : val := λ: "l",
a_store (a_ret "l") (a_bin_op PlusOp (a_load (a_ret "l")) (a_ret #1)).
Definition factorial_body : val := λ: "n" "c" "r",
a_while
(λ:<>, a_bin_op LtOp (a_load (a_ret "c")) (a_ret "n"))
(λ:<>, incr "c" ;;;;
a_store (a_ret "r")
(a_bin_op MultOp (a_load (a_ret "r")) (a_load (a_ret "c")))).
Definition factorial : val := λ: "n",
a_bind ( λ: "r",
a_bind (λ: "k",
factorial_body "n" "k" "r" ;;;;
(a_load (a_ret "r")))
(a_alloc (a_ret #0%V)))
(a_alloc (a_ret #1%V)).
End factorial.
Definition factorial : val := λ: "n",
a_bind ( λ: "r",
a_bind (λ: "k",
factorial_body "n" "k" "r" ;;;;
(a_load (a_ret "r")))
(a_alloc (a_ret #0%V)))
(a_alloc (a_ret #1%V)).
Section factorial_spec.
Context `{locking_heapG Σ, heapG Σ, flockG Σ, spawnG Σ}.
Lemma incr_spec (l : loc) (n : Z) R Φ :
......@@ -42,14 +35,14 @@ Section factorial_spec.
iApply (a_store_ret with "[Hl HΦ]").
iApply (a_bin_op_spec _ _
(λ v, ⌜v = #n⌝ ∗ l ↦U #n )%I (λ v, ⌜v = #1⌝)%I with "[Hl] [] [HΦ]").
+ awp_load_ret l #n.
+ awp_load_ret l.
+ awp_ret_value.
+ iIntros (? ?) "(% & Hc) %"; subst.
iExists #(n+1). iSplit; eauto with iFrame.
Qed.
Lemma factorial_body_spec (n k : nat) (c r: loc) R :
(⌜k <= n⌝ ∧ c ↦U #k ∗ r ↦U #(fact k)) -∗
(⌜k ≤ n⌝ ∧ c ↦U #k ∗ r ↦U #(fact k)) -∗
awp (factorial_body #n #c #r) R
(λ _, c ↦U #n ∗ r ↦U #(fact n))%I.
Proof.
......@@ -59,7 +52,7 @@ Section factorial_spec.
iApply a_if_spec.
iApply (a_bin_op_spec _ _
(λ v, ⌜v = #k⌝ ∧ c ↦U #k )%I (λ v, ⌜v = #n⌝)%I with "[Hc]").
- awp_load_ret c #k.
- awp_load_ret c.
- awp_ret_value.
- iIntros (v1 v2) "[% Hc] %"; subst.
rewrite /bin_op_eval /=. iExists _; iSplit; eauto.
......@@ -72,8 +65,8 @@ Section factorial_spec.
iApply (a_bin_op_spec _ _
(λ v, ⌜v = #(fact k)⌝ ∗ r ↦U #(fact k))%I
(λ v, ⌜v = #(k + 1)⌝ ∗ c ↦U #(k+1))%I with "[Hr] [Hc]").
* awp_load_ret r #(fact k).
* awp_load_ret c #(k + 1).
* awp_load_ret r.
* awp_load_ret c.
* iIntros (? ?) "[% Hr] [% Hc]". simplify_eq.
rewrite /bin_op_eval /=.
assert ((fact k) * (k + 1) = fact (k + 1)) as ->.
......@@ -92,13 +85,13 @@ Section factorial_spec.
awp (factorial #n) R (λ v, ⌜v = #(fact n)⌝)%I.
Proof.
awp_lam.
iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret #1 r "Hr".
iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret #0 c "Hc".
iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret r "Hr".
iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret c "Hc".
iApply a_sequence_spec.
iApply (awp_wand _ (λ _, c ↦U #n ∗ r ↦U #(fact n))%I with "[Hr Hc]").
- iApply ((factorial_body_spec n 0 c r) with "[$Hr $Hc]"); eauto with lia.
- iIntros (?) "[Hc Hr]". iModIntro. awp_seq.
awp_load_ret r #(fact n).
awp_load_ret r.
Qed.
......@@ -106,16 +99,16 @@ Section factorial_spec.
awp (factorial #n) R (λ v, ⌜v = #(fact n)⌝)%I.
Proof.
awp_lam.
iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret #1 r "Hr".
iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret #0 c "Hc".
iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret r "Hr".
iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret c "Hc".
iApply a_sequence_spec. do 3 awp_lam.
iApply (a_while_inv_spec
(∃k:nat, ⌜k <= n⌝ ∧ c ↦U #k ∗ r ↦U #(fact k))%I with "[Hr Hc]").
(∃k:nat, ⌜k ≤ n⌝ ∧ c ↦U #k ∗ r ↦U #(fact k))%I with "[Hr Hc]").
- iExists O. eauto with iFrame lia.
- iModIntro. iIntros "H". iDestruct "H" as (k) "(H & Hc & Hr)".
iApply (a_bin_op_spec _ _
(λ v, ⌜v = #k⌝ ∧ c ↦U #k )%I (λ v, ⌜v = #n⌝)%I with "[Hc]").
+ awp_load_ret c #k.
+ awp_load_ret c.
+ awp_ret_value.
+ iIntros (v1 v2) "[% Hc] %"; subst.
rewrite /bin_op_eval /=. iExists _; iSplit; eauto.
......@@ -128,8 +121,8 @@ Section factorial_spec.
iApply (a_bin_op_spec _ _
(λ v, ⌜v = #(fact k)⌝ ∗ r ↦U #(fact k))%I
(λ v, ⌜v = #(k + 1)⌝ ∗ c ↦U #(k+1))%I with "[Hr] [Hc]").
** awp_load_ret r #(fact k).
** awp_load_ret c #(k + 1).
** awp_load_ret r.
** awp_load_ret c.
** iIntros (? ?) "[% Hr] [% Hc]". simplify_eq.
rewrite /bin_op_eval /=.
assert ((fact k) * (k + 1) = fact (k + 1)) as ->.
......@@ -140,8 +133,6 @@ Section factorial_spec.
iExists (k+1)%nat. eauto with iFrame lia.
* iLeft. iSplit; eauto. do 2 iModIntro. awp_seq.
iRevert "H". iIntros "%". assert (k = n) as -> by lia.
by awp_load_ret r #(fact n).
by awp_load_ret r.
Qed.
End factorial_spec.
theories/tests/gcd.v
View file @ d22c6803
......@@ -3,31 +3,23 @@ From iris.heap_lang Require Import spin_lock assert par.
From iris.algebra Require Import frac auth.
From iris_c.lib Require Import locking_heap mset flock U.
From iris_c.c_translation Require Import proofmode translation derived.
Require Import Coq.ZArith.Znumtheory.
Section gcd.
Definition gcd : val := λ: "a" "b",
(a_while
(λ:<>, a_un_op NegOp
(a_bin_op EqOp (a_load (a_ret "a")) (a_load (a_ret "b"))))
(λ:<>, a_if (a_bin_op LtOp (a_load (a_ret "a")) (a_load (a_ret "b")))
(λ:<>, a_store (a_ret "b")
((a_bin_op MinusOp (a_load (a_ret "b")) (a_load (a_ret "a")))))
(λ:<>, a_store (a_ret "a")
((a_bin_op MinusOp (a_load (a_ret "a")) (a_load (a_ret "b")))))))
;;;; a_load (a_ret "a").
End gcd.
Definition gcd : val := λ: "a" "b",
(a_while
(λ:<>, a_un_op NegOp
(a_bin_op EqOp (a_load (a_ret "a")) (a_load (a_ret "b"))))
(λ:<>, a_if (a_bin_op LtOp (a_load (a_ret "a")) (a_load (a_ret "b")))
(λ:<>, a_store (a_ret "b")
((a_bin_op MinusOp (a_load (a_ret "b")) (a_load (a_ret "a")))))
(λ:<>, a_store (a_ret "a")
((a_bin_op MinusOp (a_load (a_ret "a")) (a_load (a_ret "b")))))))
;;;; a_load (a_ret "a").
Section gcd_spec.
Require Import Coq.ZArith.Znumtheory.
Context `{locking_heapG Σ, heapG Σ, flockG Σ, spawnG Σ}.
Lemma gcd_spec (a b : Z) (l r: loc) R:
⌜a >= 0⌝ -∗ ⌜b >= 0⌝ -∗
l ↦U #a -∗ r ↦U #b -∗
......@@ -48,7 +40,7 @@ Section gcd_spec.
+ iExists #true. simplify_eq /=. iSplit.
{ rewrite/ bin_op_eval //=; case_bool_decide; eauto. }
iExists #false; iSplit; first done. iLeft; iSplit; first done.
do 2 iModIntro. awp_seq. awp_load_ret l #y. iIntros.
do 2 iModIntro. awp_seq. awp_load_ret l. iIntros.
rewrite- H5. iPureIntro. symmetry. rewrite Z.gcd_diag.
rewrite Z.abs_eq; eauto with lia.
+ iExists #false. simplify_eq /=. iSplit.
......@@ -84,5 +76,4 @@ Section gcd_spec.
do 2 (split; first by lia).
rewrite -H5 Z.gcd_comm (Z.gcd_comm x); apply Z.gcd_sub_diag_r.
Qed.
End gcd_spec.
theories/tests/test1.v
View file @ d22c6803
......@@ -17,25 +17,24 @@ Section test.
iApply a_seq_spec.
iModIntro.
awp_lam.
awp_load_ret l #1.
awp_load_ret l.
Qed.
(* Lemma test2 (l r : loc) R : *)
(* l ↦U #3 -∗ r ↦L #0 -∗ *)
(* awp (a_store (a_ret #l) (a_ret #1);;; a_seq #();;; a_load (a_ret #l)) R (fun v => ⌜v = #1⌝). *)
(* Proof. *)
(* iIntros "Hl Hr". *)
(* iApply awp_bind. *)
(* iApply (a_store_spec with "Hl"). iIntros "Hl". *)
(* awp_lam. *)
(* iApply awp_bind. *)
(* iApply a_seq_spec. *)
(* iUnlock. *)
(* awp_lam. *)
(* iApply (a_load_spec with "Hl"). iIntros "Hl". eauto. *)
(* Qed. *)
Lemma test2 (l r : loc) R :
l ↦U #3 -∗ r ↦L #0 -∗
awp (a_store (a_ret #l) (a_ret #1);;; a_seq #();;; a_load (a_ret #l)) R (fun v => ⌜v = #1⌝).
Proof.
iIntros "Hl Hr".
iApply awp_bind.
iApply a_store_ret.
iApply awp_ret. iApply wp_value. iExists _; iFrame.
iIntros "Hl". awp_seq.
iApply awp_bind.
iApply a_seq_spec.
iModIntro. awp_seq.
awp_load_ret l.
Qed.
Definition swap : val := λ: "l1" "l2",
......@@ -50,19 +49,19 @@ Section test.
awp (swap #l1 #l2) R (λ _, l1 ↦U v2 ∗ l2 ↦U v1).
Proof.
iIntros "Hl1 Hl2".
do 2 awp_lam. iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret #0 r "Hr".
do 2 awp_lam. iApply awp_bind. awp_alloc_ret r "Hr".
iApply a_sequence_spec.
iApply (a_store_ret with "[Hl1 Hl2 Hr]").
awp_load_ret l1 v1. iIntros "Hl1". iExists #0. iFrame.
awp_load_ret l1. iIntros "Hl1". iExists #0. iFrame.
iIntros "Hr". iModIntro. awp_seq. iApply a_sequence_spec.
iApply (a_store_ret with "[Hl1 Hl2 Hr]").
awp_load_ret l2 v2. iIntros "Hl2". iExists v1. iFrame.
awp_load_ret l2. iIntros "Hl2". iExists v1. iFrame.
iIntros "Hl1". iModIntro. awp_seq. iApply awp_bind.
iApply (a_store_ret with "[Hl1 Hl2 Hr]").
awp_load_ret r v1. iIntros "Hr". iExists v2. iFrame.
awp_load_ret r. iIntros "Hr". iExists v2. iFrame.
iIntros "Hl2". awp_seq. iApply a_seq_spec. iModIntro. by iFrame.
Qed.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment