Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
What's new
10
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Open sidebar
George Pirlea
Iris
Commits
fda80965
Commit
fda80965
authored
Sep 29, 2017
by
Robbert Krebbers
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Fix regression caused by
e17ac4ad
and another similar bug.
parent
c0253c3e
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Sidebyside
Showing
2 changed files
with
23 additions
and
10 deletions
+23
10
theories/proofmode/tactics.v
theories/proofmode/tactics.v
+11
10
theories/tests/proofmode.v
theories/tests/proofmode.v
+12
0
No files found.
theories/proofmode/tactics.v
View file @
fda80965
...
...
@@ 535,16 +535,17 @@ a goal [P] for nondependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
Tactic
Notation
"iIntoValid"
open_constr
(
t
)
:
=
let
rec
go
t
:
=
let
tT
:
=
type
of
t
in
first
[
apply
(
proj1
(
_
:
AsValid
tT
_
)
t
)

lazymatch
eval
hnf
in
tT
with

?P
→
?Q
=>
let
H
:
=
fresh
in
assert
P
as
H
;
[
go
uconstr
:
(
t
H
)
;
clear
H
]

∀
_
:
?T
,
_
=>
(* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
(* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
let
e
:
=
fresh
in
evar
(
e
:
id
T
)
;
let
e'
:
=
eval
unfold
e
in
e
in
clear
e
;
go
(
t
e'
)
end
]
in
lazymatch
eval
hnf
in
tT
with

?P
→
?Q
=>
let
H
:
=
fresh
in
assert
P
as
H
;
[
go
uconstr
:
(
t
H
)
;
clear
H
]

∀
_
:
?T
,
_
=>
(* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
(* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
let
e
:
=
fresh
in
evar
(
e
:
id
T
)
;
let
e'
:
=
eval
unfold
e
in
e
in
clear
e
;
go
(
t
e'
)

_
=>
let
tT'
:
=
eval
cbv
zeta
in
tT
in
apply
(
proj1
(
_
:
AsValid
tT'
_
)
t
)

fail
"iPoseProof: not a uPred"
end
in
go
t
.
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
...
...
theories/tests/proofmode.v
View file @
fda80965
...
...
@@ 201,6 +201,18 @@ Lemma test_True_intros : (True : uPred M) ∗ True.
Proof
.
iIntros
"?"
.
done
.
Qed
.
Lemma
test_iPoseProof_let
P
Q
:
(
let
R
:
=
True
%
I
in
R
∗
P
⊢
Q
)
→
P
⊢
Q
.
Proof
.
iIntros
(
help
)
"HP"
.
iPoseProof
(
help
with
"[$HP]"
)
as
"?"
.
done
.
Qed
.
Lemma
test_iIntros_let
P
:
∀
Q
,
let
R
:
=
True
%
I
in
P

∗
R

∗
Q

∗
P
∗
Q
.
Proof
.
iIntros
(
Q
R
)
"$ HR $"
.
Qed
.
End
tests
.
Section
more_tests
.
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment