collections.v 43.7 KB
Newer Older
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1
2
3
4
5
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2015, Robbert Krebbers. *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects definitions and theorems on collections. Most
importantly, it implements some tactics to automatically solve goals involving
collections. *)
6
From iris.prelude Require Export orders list.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
7

8
9
Instance collection_equiv `{ElemOf A C} : Equiv C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
10
11
Instance collection_subseteq `{ElemOf A C} : SubsetEq C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y.
12
13
14
Instance collection_disjoint `{ElemOf A C} : Disjoint C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y  False.
Typeclasses Opaque collection_equiv collection_subseteq collection_disjoint.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
15

16
17
(** * Setoids *)
Section setoids_simple.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
19
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.

20
  Global Instance collection_equivalence: @Equivalence C ().
21
  Proof.
22
23
24
25
    split.
    - done.
    - intros X Y ? x. by symmetry.
    - intros X Y Z ?? x; by trans (x  Y).
26
  Qed.
27
28
29
30
31
32
  Global Instance singleton_proper : Proper ((=) ==> ()) (singleton (B:=C)).
  Proof. apply _. Qed.
  Global Instance elem_of_proper :
    Proper ((=) ==> () ==> iff) (@elem_of A C _) | 5.
  Proof. by intros x ? <- X Y. Qed.
  Global Instance disjoint_proper: Proper (() ==> () ==> iff) (@disjoint C _).
33
  Proof.
34
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY; apply forall_proper; intros x. by rewrite HX, HY.
35
  Qed.
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
  Global Instance union_proper : Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@union C _).
  Proof. intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. rewrite !elem_of_union. f_equiv; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance union_list_proper: Proper (() ==> ()) (union_list (A:=C)).
  Proof. by induction 1; simpl; try apply union_proper. Qed.
  Global Instance subseteq_proper : Proper (() ==> () ==> iff) (() : relation C).
  Proof.
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY. apply forall_proper; intros x. by rewrite HX, HY.
  Qed.
End setoids_simple.

Section setoids.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
48

49
50
51
  (** * Setoids *)
  Global Instance intersection_proper :
    Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@intersection C _).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
52
  Proof.
53
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. by rewrite !elem_of_intersection, HX, HY.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
54
  Qed.
55
56
  Global Instance difference_proper :
     Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@difference C _).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
57
  Proof.
58
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. by rewrite !elem_of_difference, HX, HY.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
59
  Qed.
60
End setoids.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
61

62
63
64
65
66
Section setoids_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.

  Global Instance collection_fmap_proper {A B} :
    Proper (pointwise_relation _ (=) ==> () ==> ()) (@fmap M _ A B).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  Proof.
68
69
    intros f1 f2 Hf X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_fmap. f_equiv; intros z.
    by rewrite HX, Hf.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
70
  Qed.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
  Global Instance collection_bind_proper {A B} :
    Proper (((=) ==> ()) ==> () ==> ()) (@mbind M _ A B).
  Proof.
    intros f1 f2 Hf X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_bind. f_equiv; intros z.
    by rewrite HX, (Hf z z).
  Qed.
  Global Instance collection_join_proper {A} :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (@mjoin M _ A).
  Proof.
    intros X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_join. f_equiv; intros z. by rewrite HX.
  Qed.
End setoids_monad.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
83

84
85
86
87
88
(** * Tactics *)
(** The tactic [set_unfold] transforms all occurrences of [(∪)], [(∩)], [(∖)],
[(<$>)], [∅], [{[_]}], [(≡)], and [(⊆)] into logically equivalent propositions
involving just [∈]. For example, [A → x ∈ X ∪ ∅] becomes [A → x ∈ X ∨ False].

89
90
91
This transformation is implemented using type classes instead of setoid
rewriting to ensure that we traverse each term at most once and to be able to
deal with occurences of the set operations under binders. *)
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
Class SetUnfold (P Q : Prop) := { set_unfold : P  Q }.
Arguments set_unfold _ _ {_}.
Hint Mode SetUnfold + - : typeclass_instances.

Class SetUnfoldSimpl (P Q : Prop) := { set_unfold_simpl : SetUnfold P Q }.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfoldSimpl _ _) => csimpl; constructor : typeclass_instances.

99
Instance set_unfold_default P : SetUnfold P P | 1000. done. Qed.
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
Definition set_unfold_1 `{SetUnfold P Q} : P  Q := proj1 (set_unfold P Q).
Definition set_unfold_2 `{SetUnfold P Q} : Q  P := proj2 (set_unfold P Q).

Lemma set_unfold_impl P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_and P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_or P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_iff P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_not P P' : SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold (¬P) (¬P').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_forall {A} (P P' : A  Prop) :
  ( x, SetUnfold (P x) (P' x))  SetUnfold ( x, P x) ( x, P' x).
Proof. constructor. naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_exist {A} (P P' : A  Prop) :
  ( x, SetUnfold (P x) (P' x))  SetUnfold ( x, P x) ( x, P' x).
Proof. constructor. naive_solver. Qed.

(* Avoid too eager application of the above instances (and thus too eager
unfolding of type class transparent definitions). *)
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_impl : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_and : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_or : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_iff : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (¬ _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_not : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 1 (SetUnfold ( _, _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_forall : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold ( _, _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_exist : typeclass_instances.

Section set_unfold_simple.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.

  Global Instance set_unfold_empty x : SetUnfold (x  ) False.
147
  Proof. constructor. split. apply not_elem_of_empty. done. Qed.
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
  Global Instance set_unfold_singleton x y : SetUnfold (x  {[ y ]}) (x = y).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_union x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  Q).
  Proof.
    intros ??; constructor.
    by rewrite elem_of_union, (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_same X : SetUnfold (X  X) True | 1.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_l X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (  X) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
  Proof.
161
162
    intros ?; constructor. unfold equiv, collection_equiv.
    pose proof not_elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
163
164
165
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_r (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (X  ) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
166
167
168
169
  Proof.
    intros ?; constructor. unfold equiv, collection_equiv.
    pose proof not_elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
  Qed.
170
171
172
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x) | 10.
173
  Proof. constructor. apply forall_proper; naive_solver. Qed.
174
175
176
  Global Instance set_unfold_subseteq (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x).
177
  Proof. constructor. apply forall_proper; naive_solver. Qed.
178
179
  Global Instance set_unfold_subset (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
180
    SetUnfold (X  Y) (( x, P x  Q x)  ¬∀ x, Q x  P x).
181
  Proof.
182
183
    constructor. unfold strict.
    repeat f_equiv; apply forall_proper; naive_solver.
184
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
185
186
187
  Global Instance set_unfold_disjoint (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x  False).
188
  Proof. constructor. unfold disjoint, collection_disjoint. naive_solver. Qed.
189
190
191
192
193
194

  Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_same_L X : SetUnfold (X = X) True | 1.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_l_L X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold ( = X) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
195
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv_empty_l. Qed.
196
197
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_r_L (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (X = ) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
198
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv_empty_r. Qed.
199
200
201
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_L (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X = Y) ( x, P x  Q x) | 10.
202
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv. Qed.
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
End set_unfold_simple.

Section set_unfold.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.

  Global Instance set_unfold_intersection x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  Q).
  Proof.
213
214
    intros ??; constructor. rewrite elem_of_intersection.
    by rewrite (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
215
216
217
218
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_difference x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  ¬Q).
  Proof.
219
220
    intros ??; constructor. rewrite elem_of_difference.
    by rewrite (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
  Qed.
End set_unfold.

Section set_unfold_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M} {A : Type}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.

  Global Instance set_unfold_ret x y : SetUnfold (x  mret y) (x = y).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_ret. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_bind {B} (f : A  M B) X (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( y, SetUnfold (y  X) (P y))  ( y, SetUnfold (x  f y) (Q y)) 
    SetUnfold (x  X = f) ( y, Q y  P y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_bind; naive_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_fmap {B} (f : A  B) X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( y, SetUnfold (y  X) (P y)) 
    SetUnfold (x  f <$> X) ( y, x = f y  P y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_fmap; naive_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_join (X : M (M A)) (P : M A  Prop) :
    ( Y, SetUnfold (Y  X) (P Y))  SetUnfold (x  mjoin X) ( Y, x  Y  P Y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_join; naive_solver. Qed.
End set_unfold_monad.

Ltac set_unfold :=
  let rec unfold_hyps :=
    try match goal with
    | H : _ |- _ =>
       apply set_unfold_1 in H; revert H;
       first [unfold_hyps; intros H | intros H; fail 1]
    end in
  apply set_unfold_2; unfold_hyps; csimpl in *.

252
253
(** Since [firstorder] already fails or loops on very small goals generated by
[set_solver], we use the [naive_solver] tactic as a substitute. *)
254
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "by" tactic3(tac) :=
255
  try fast_done;
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
  intros; setoid_subst;
  set_unfold;
  intros; setoid_subst;
  try match goal with |- _  _ => apply dec_stable end;
  naive_solver tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "-" hyp_list(Hs) "by" tactic3(tac) :=
  clear Hs; set_solver by tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "+" hyp_list(Hs) "by" tactic3(tac) :=
  clear -Hs; set_solver by tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" := set_solver by idtac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "-" hyp_list(Hs) := clear Hs; set_solver.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "+" hyp_list(Hs) := clear -Hs; set_solver.

269
270
271
272
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
273

274
275
(** * Collections with [∪], [∅] and [{[_]}] *)
Section simple_collection.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
276
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
  Implicit Types Xs Ys : list C.

  (** Equality *)
  Lemma elem_of_equiv X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma collection_equiv_spec X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Subset relation *)
  Global Instance collection_subseteq_antisymm: AntiSymm () (() : relation C).
  Proof. intros ??. set_solver. Qed.

  Global Instance collection_subseteq_preorder: PreOrder (() : relation C).
  Proof. split. by intros ??. intros ???; set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma subseteq_union X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_union_1 X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y.
  Proof. by rewrite subseteq_union. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_union_2 X Y : X  Y  Y  X  Y.
  Proof. by rewrite subseteq_union. Qed.

  Lemma union_subseteq_l X Y : X  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_subseteq_r X Y : Y  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_least X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y  Z.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma elem_of_subseteq X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_subset X Y : X  Y  ( x, x  X  x  Y)  ¬( x, x  Y  x  X).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Union *)
  Lemma not_elem_of_union x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_union_l x X Y : x  X  x  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_union_r x X Y : x  Y  x  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma union_preserving_l X Y1 Y2 : Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_preserving_r X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_preserving X1 X2 Y1 Y2 : X1  X2  Y1  Y2  X1  Y1  X2  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Global Instance union_idemp : IdemP (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_empty_l : LeftId (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_empty_r : RightId (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_comm : Comm (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_assoc : Assoc (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y Z. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma empty_union X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
342
343
344
345
346
  Lemma union_cancel_l X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z  Y  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_cancel_r X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
  (** Empty *)
  Lemma elem_of_equiv_empty X : X     x, x  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_empty x : x    False.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma equiv_empty X : X    X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_positive_l X Y : X  Y    X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_positive_l_alt X Y : X    X  Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma non_empty_inhabited x X : x  X  X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Singleton *)
  Lemma elem_of_singleton_1 x y : x  {[y]}  x = y.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_singleton_2 x y : x = y  x  {[y]}.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_subseteq_singleton x X : x  X  {[ x ]}  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma non_empty_singleton x : ({[ x ]} : C)  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma not_elem_of_singleton x y : x  {[ y ]}  x  y.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.

  (** Disjointness *)
  Lemma elem_of_disjoint X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y  False.
  Proof. done. Qed.

  Global Instance disjoint_sym : Symmetric (@disjoint C _).
  Proof. intros X Y. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_empty_l Y :   Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_empty_r X : X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_singleton_l x Y : {[ x ]}  Y  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_singleton_r y X : X  {[ y ]}  y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_union_l X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  Y  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_union_r X Y1 Y2 : X  Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Big unions *)
  Lemma elem_of_union_list Xs x : x   Xs   X, X  Xs  x  X.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
394
395
  Proof.
    split.
396
397
    - induction Xs; simpl; intros HXs; [by apply elem_of_empty in HXs|].
      setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons. apply elem_of_union in HXs. naive_solver.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
398
    - intros [X [Hx]]. induction Hx; simpl; [by apply elem_of_union_l |].
399
      intros. apply elem_of_union_r; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
400
401
  Qed.

402
403
404
405
406
407
408
  Lemma union_list_nil :  @nil C = .
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma union_list_cons X Xs :  (X :: Xs) = X   Xs.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma union_list_singleton X :  [X]  X.
  Proof. simpl. by rewrite (right_id  _). Qed.
  Lemma union_list_app Xs1 Xs2 :  (Xs1 ++ Xs2)   Xs1   Xs2.
409
  Proof.
410
411
    induction Xs1 as [|X Xs1 IH]; simpl; [by rewrite (left_id  _)|].
    by rewrite IH, (assoc _).
412
  Qed.
413
  Lemma union_list_reverse Xs :  (reverse Xs)   Xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
414
  Proof.
415
416
417
    induction Xs as [|X Xs IH]; simpl; [done |].
    by rewrite reverse_cons, union_list_app,
      union_list_singleton, (comm _), IH.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
418
  Qed.
419
420
421
  Lemma union_list_preserving Xs Ys : Xs * Ys   Xs   Ys.
  Proof. induction 1; simpl; auto using union_preserving. Qed.
  Lemma empty_union_list Xs :  Xs    Forall ( ) Xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
422
  Proof.
423
424
425
    split.
    - induction Xs; simpl; rewrite ?empty_union; intuition.
    - induction 1 as [|?? E1 ? E2]; simpl. done. by apply empty_union.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
426
427
  Qed.

428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
  Section leibniz.
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.

    Lemma elem_of_equiv_L X Y : X = Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv. Qed.
    Lemma collection_equiv_spec_L X Y : X = Y  X  Y  Y  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_equiv_spec. Qed.

    (** Subset relation *)
    Global Instance collection_subseteq_partialorder :
      PartialOrder (() : relation C).
    Proof. split. apply _. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (anti_symm _). Qed.

    Lemma subseteq_union_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_union_1_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union_1. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_union_2_L X Y : X  Y = Y  X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union_2. Qed.

    (** Union *)
    Global Instance union_idemp_L : IdemP (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (idemp _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_empty_l_L : LeftId (@eq C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (left_id _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_empty_r_L : RightId (@eq C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (right_id _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_comm_L : Comm (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (comm _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_assoc_L : Assoc (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ???. unfold_leibniz. apply (assoc _). Qed.

    Lemma empty_union_L X Y : X  Y =   X =   Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply empty_union. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
464
465
466
467
    Lemma union_cancel_l_L X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X = Z  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_cancel_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_cancel_r_L X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z = Y  Z  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_cancel_r. Qed.

468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
    (** Empty *)
    Lemma elem_of_equiv_empty_L X : X =    x, x  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv_empty. Qed.
    Lemma equiv_empty_L X : X    X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply equiv_empty. Qed.
    Lemma union_positive_l_L X Y : X  Y =   X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_positive_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_positive_l_alt_L X Y : X    X  Y  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_positive_l_alt. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_inhabited_L x X : x  X  X  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_inhabited. Qed.

    (** Singleton *)
    Lemma non_empty_singleton_L x : {[ x ]}  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_singleton. Qed.

    (** Big unions *)
    Lemma union_list_singleton_L X :  [X] = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_singleton. Qed.
    Lemma union_list_app_L Xs1 Xs2 :  (Xs1 ++ Xs2) =  Xs1   Xs2.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_app. Qed.
    Lemma union_list_reverse_L Xs :  (reverse Xs) =  Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_reverse. Qed.
    Lemma empty_union_list_L Xs :  Xs =   Forall (= ) Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. by rewrite empty_union_list. Qed. 
  End leibniz.

  Section dec.
    Context `{ (X Y : C), Decision (X  Y)}.
    Lemma collection_subseteq_inv X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X  Y.
    Proof. destruct (decide (X  Y)); [by right|left;set_solver]. Qed.
    Lemma collection_not_subset_inv X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X  Y.
    Proof. destruct (decide (X  Y)); [by right|left;set_solver]. Qed.

    Lemma non_empty_union X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
    Proof. rewrite empty_union. destruct (decide (X  )); intuition. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_list Xs :  Xs    Exists ( ) Xs.
    Proof. rewrite empty_union_list. apply (not_Forall_Exists _). Qed.

    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma collection_subseteq_inv_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_subseteq_inv. Qed.
    Lemma collection_not_subset_inv_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_not_subset_inv. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_L X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_union. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_list_L Xs :  Xs    Exists ( ) Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_union_list. Qed.
  End dec.
End simple_collection.


(** * Collections with [∪], [∩], [∖], [∅] and [{[_]}] *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
521
522
Section collection.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
523
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
524

525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
  (** Intersection *)
  Lemma subseteq_intersection X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed. 
  Lemma subseteq_intersection_1 X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
  Proof. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_intersection_2 X Y : X  Y  X  X  Y.
  Proof. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.

  Lemma intersection_subseteq_l X Y : X  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_subseteq_r X Y : X  Y  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_greatest X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma intersection_preserving_l X Y1 Y2 : Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_preserving_r X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_preserving X1 X2 Y1 Y2 :
    X1  X2  Y1  Y2  X1  Y1  X2  Y2.
546
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558

  Global Instance intersection_idemp : IdemP (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_comm : Comm (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_assoc : Assoc (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y Z; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_empty_l : LeftAbsorb (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_empty_r: RightAbsorb (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.

559
  Lemma intersection_singletons x : ({[x]} : C)  {[x]}  {[x]}.
560
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571

  Lemma union_intersection_l X Y Z : X  (Y  Z)  (X  Y)  (X  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_intersection_r X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_union_l X Y Z : X  (Y  Z)  (X  Y)  (X  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_union_r X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Difference *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
572
  Lemma difference_twice X Y : (X  Y)  Y  X  Y.
573
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
574
  Lemma subseteq_empty_difference X Y : X  Y  X  Y  .
575
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
576
  Lemma difference_diag X : X  X  .
577
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
578
  Lemma difference_union_distr_l X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  X  Z  Y  Z.
579
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
580
  Lemma difference_union_distr_r X Y Z : Z  (X  Y)  (Z  X)  (Z  Y).
581
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
582
  Lemma difference_intersection_distr_l X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  X  Z  Y  Z.
583
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
584
  Lemma difference_disjoint X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
585
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
586

587
588
589
590
  (** Disjointness *)
  Lemma disjoint_intersection X Y : X  Y  X  Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
591
592
  Section leibniz.
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612

    (** Intersection *)
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_1_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection_1. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_2_L X Y : X  Y = X  X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection_2. Qed.

    Global Instance intersection_idemp_L : IdemP ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (idemp _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_comm_L : Comm ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (comm _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_assoc_L : Assoc ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ???. unfold_leibniz. apply (assoc _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_empty_l_L: LeftAbsorb ((=) : relation C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (left_absorb _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_empty_r_L: RightAbsorb ((=) : relation C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (right_absorb _ _). Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
613
614
    Lemma intersection_singletons_L x : {[x]}  {[x]} = {[x]}.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply intersection_singletons. Qed.
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625

    Lemma union_intersection_l_L X Y Z : X  (Y  Z) = (X  Y)  (X  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply union_intersection_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_intersection_r_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z = (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply union_intersection_r. Qed.
    Lemma intersection_union_l_L X Y Z : X  (Y  Z)  (X  Y)  (X  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply intersection_union_l. Qed.
    Lemma intersection_union_r_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply intersection_union_r. Qed.

    (** Difference *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
    Lemma difference_twice_L X Y : (X  Y)  Y = X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_twice. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_empty_difference_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_empty_difference. Qed.
    Lemma difference_diag_L X : X  X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_diag. Qed.
    Lemma difference_union_distr_l_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z = X  Z  Y  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_union_distr_l. Qed.
    Lemma difference_union_distr_r_L X Y Z : Z  (X  Y) = (Z  X)  (Z  Y).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_union_distr_r. Qed.
    Lemma difference_intersection_distr_l_L X Y Z :
      (X  Y)  Z = X  Z  Y  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_intersection_distr_l. Qed.
639
640
    Lemma difference_disjoint_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_disjoint. Qed.
641
642
643
644

    (** Disjointness *)
    Lemma disjoint_intersection_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply disjoint_intersection. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
645
646
647
  End leibniz.

  Section dec.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
648
    Context `{ (x : A) (X : C), Decision (x  X)}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
649
650
651
652
653
654
    Lemma not_elem_of_intersection x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
    Proof. rewrite elem_of_intersection. destruct (decide (x  X)); tauto. Qed.
    Lemma not_elem_of_difference x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
    Proof. rewrite elem_of_difference. destruct (decide (x  Y)); tauto. Qed.
    Lemma union_difference X Y : X  Y  Y  X  Y  X.
    Proof.
655
      intros ? x; split; rewrite !elem_of_union, elem_of_difference; [|intuition].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
656
657
      destruct (decide (x  X)); intuition.
    Qed.
658
659
660
661
662
    Lemma subseteq_disjoint_union X Y : X  Y   Z, Y  X  Z  X  Z.
    Proof.
      split; [|set_solver].
      exists (Y  X); split; [auto using union_difference|set_solver].
    Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
663
    Lemma non_empty_difference X Y : X  Y  Y  X  .
664
    Proof. intros [HXY1 HXY2] Hdiff. destruct HXY2. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
665
    Lemma empty_difference_subseteq X Y : X  Y    X  Y.
666
    Proof. set_solver. Qed.
667

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma union_difference_L X Y : X  Y  Y = X  Y  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_difference. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_difference_L X Y : X  Y  Y  X  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_difference. Qed.
    Lemma empty_difference_subseteq_L X Y : X  Y =   X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply empty_difference_subseteq. Qed.
675
676
    Lemma subseteq_disjoint_union_L X Y : X  Y   Z, Y = X  Z  X  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_disjoint_union. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
677
678
679
  End dec.
End collection.

680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723

(** * Conversion of option and list *)
Definition of_option `{Singleton A C, Empty C} (mx : option A) : C :=
  match mx with None =>  | Some x => {[ x ]} end.
Fixpoint of_list `{Singleton A C, Empty C, Union C} (l : list A) : C :=
  match l with [] =>  | x :: l => {[ x ]}  of_list l end.

Section of_option_list.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
  Lemma elem_of_of_option (x : A) mx: x  of_option mx  mx = Some x.
  Proof. destruct mx; set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_of_list (x : A) l : x  of_list l  x  l.
  Proof.
    split.
    - induction l; simpl; [by rewrite elem_of_empty|].
      rewrite elem_of_union,elem_of_singleton; intros [->|?]; constructor; auto.
    - induction 1; simpl; rewrite elem_of_union, elem_of_singleton; auto.
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_of_option (mx : option A) x :
    SetUnfold (x  of_option mx) (mx = Some x).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_of_option. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_of_list (l : list A) x P :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  of_list l) P.
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_of_list, (set_unfold (x  l) P). Qed.
End of_option_list.

Section list_unfold.
  Context {A : Type}.
  Implicit Types x : A.
  Implicit Types l : list A.

  Global Instance set_unfold_nil x : SetUnfold (x  []) False.
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_nil. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_cons x y l P :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  y :: l) (x = y  P).
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_cons, (set_unfold (x  l) P). Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_app x l k P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  k) Q  SetUnfold (x  l ++ k) (P  Q).
  Proof.
    intros ??; constructor.
    by rewrite elem_of_app, (set_unfold (x  l) P), (set_unfold (x  k) Q).
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_included l k (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  l) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  k) (Q x)) 
724
725
    SetUnfold (l  k) ( x, P x  Q x).
  Proof. by constructor; unfold subseteq, list_subseteq; set_unfold. Qed.
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
End list_unfold.


(** * Guard *)
Global Instance collection_guard `{CollectionMonad M} : MGuard M :=
  λ P dec A x, match dec with left H => x H | _ =>  end.

Section collection_monad_base.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.
  Lemma elem_of_guard `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) (X : M A) :
    x  guard P; X  P  x  X.
  Proof.
    unfold mguard, collection_guard; simpl; case_match;
      rewrite ?elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_guard_2 `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) (X : M A) :
    P  x  X  x  guard P; X.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_guard. Qed.
  Lemma guard_empty `{Decision P} {A} (X : M A) : guard P; X    ¬P  X  .
  Proof.
    rewrite !elem_of_equiv_empty; setoid_rewrite elem_of_guard.
    destruct (decide P); naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_guard `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) X Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) Q  SetUnfold (x  guard P; X) (P  Q).
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_guard, (set_unfold (x  X) Q). Qed.
  Lemma bind_empty {A B} (f : A  M B) X :
    X = f    X     x, x  X  f x  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
End collection_monad_base.


Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
(** * Quantifiers *)
Section quantifiers.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B} (P : A  Prop).

  Definition set_Forall X :=  x, x  X  P x.
  Definition set_Exists X :=  x, x  X  P x.

  Lemma set_Forall_empty : set_Forall .
766
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767
  Lemma set_Forall_singleton x : set_Forall {[ x ]}  P x.
768
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
769
  Lemma set_Forall_union X Y : set_Forall X  set_Forall Y  set_Forall (X  Y).
770
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771
  Lemma set_Forall_union_inv_1 X Y : set_Forall (X  Y)  set_Forall X.
772
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
773
  Lemma set_Forall_union_inv_2 X Y : set_Forall (X  Y)  set_Forall Y.
774
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775
776

  Lemma set_Exists_empty : ¬set_Exists .
777
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
778
  Lemma set_Exists_singleton x : set_Exists {[ x ]}  P x.
779
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
780
  Lemma set_Exists_union_1 X Y : set_Exists X  set_Exists (X  Y).
781
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782
  Lemma set_Exists_union_2 X Y : set_Exists Y  set_Exists (X  Y).
783
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784
785
  Lemma set_Exists_union_inv X Y :
    set_Exists (X  Y)  set_Exists X  set_Exists Y.
786
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
End quantifiers.

Section more_quantifiers.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B}.

  Lemma set_Forall_weaken (P Q : A  Prop) (Hweaken :  x, P x  Q x) X :
    set_Forall P X  set_Forall Q X.
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. naive_solver. Qed.
  Lemma set_Exists_weaken (P Q : A  Prop) (Hweaken :  x, P x  Q x) X :
    set_Exists P X  set_Exists Q X.
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. naive_solver. Qed.
End more_quantifiers.

(** * Fresh elements *)
(** We collect some properties on the [fresh] operation. In particular we
generalize [fresh] to generate lists of fresh elements. *)
Fixpoint fresh_list `{Fresh A C, Union C, Singleton A C}
    (n : nat) (X : C) : list A :=
  match n with
  | 0 => []
  | S n => let x := fresh X in x :: fresh_list n ({[ x ]}  X)
  end.
Inductive Forall_fresh `{ElemOf A C} (X : C) : list A  Prop :=
  | Forall_fresh_nil : Forall_fresh X []
  | Forall_fresh_cons x xs :
     x  xs  x  X  Forall_fresh X xs  Forall_fresh X (x :: xs).

Section fresh.
  Context `{FreshSpec A C}.
816
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
817

818
  Global Instance fresh_proper: Proper (() ==> (=)) (fresh (C:=C)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
819
  Proof. intros ???. by apply fresh_proper_alt, elem_of_equiv. Qed.
820
821
  Global Instance fresh_list_proper:
    Proper ((=) ==> () ==> (=)) (fresh_list (C:=C)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
822
  Proof.
823
    intros ? n ->. induction n as [|n IH]; intros ?? E; f_equal/=; [by rewrite E|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
824
825
826
    apply IH. by rewrite E.
  Qed.

827
828
  Lemma exist_fresh X :  x, x  X.
  Proof. exists (fresh X). apply is_fresh. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
829
830
831
832
  Lemma Forall_fresh_NoDup X xs : Forall_fresh X xs  NoDup xs.
  Proof. induction 1; by constructor. Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_elem_of X xs x : Forall_fresh X xs  x  xs  x  X.
  Proof.
833
    intros HX; revert x; rewrite <-Forall_forall. by induction HX; constructor.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
  Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_alt X xs :
    Forall_fresh X xs  NoDup xs   x, x  xs  x  X.
  Proof.
    split; eauto using Forall_fresh_NoDup, Forall_fresh_elem_of.
    rewrite <-Forall_forall.
    intros [Hxs Hxs']. induction Hxs; decompose_Forall_hyps; constructor; auto.
  Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_subseteq X Y xs :
    Forall_fresh X xs  Y  X  Forall_fresh Y xs.
844
  Proof. rewrite !Forall_fresh_alt; set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
845
846
847
848
849
850
851

  Lemma fresh_list_length n X : length (fresh_list n X) = n.
  Proof. revert X. induction n; simpl; auto. Qed.
  Lemma fresh_list_is_fresh n X x : x  fresh_list n X  x  X.
  Proof.
    revert X. induction n as [|n IH]; intros X; simpl;[by rewrite elem_of_nil|].
    rewrite elem_of_cons; intros [->| Hin]; [apply is_fresh|].
852
    apply IH in Hin; set_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
853
854
855
856
  Qed.
  Lemma NoDup_fresh_list n X : NoDup (fresh_list n X).
  Proof.
    revert X. induction n; simpl; constructor; auto.
857
    intros Hin; apply fresh_list_is_fresh in Hin; set_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
  Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_list X n : Forall_fresh X (fresh_list n X).
  Proof.
    rewrite Forall_fresh_alt; eauto using NoDup_fresh_list, fresh_list_is_fresh.
  Qed.
End fresh.

(** * Properties of implementations of collections that form a monad *)
Section collection_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.

869
870
  Global Instance collection_fmap_mono {A B} :
    Proper (pointwise_relation _ (=) ==> () ==> ()) (@fmap M _ A B).
871
  Proof. intros f g ? X Y ?; set_solver by eauto. Qed.
872
873
  Global Instance collection_bind_mono {A B} :
    Proper (((=) ==> ()) ==> () ==> ()) (@mbind M _ A B).
874
  Proof. unfold respectful; intros f g Hfg X Y ?; set_solver. Qed.
875
876
  Global Instance collection_join_mono {A} :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (@mjoin M _ A).
877
  Proof. intros X Y ?; set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
878
879

  Lemma collection_bind_singleton {A B} (f : A  M B) x : {[ x ]} = f  f x.
880
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
881
  Lemma collection_guard_True {A} `{Decision P} (X : M A) : P  guard P; X  X.
882
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
883
  Lemma collection_fmap_compose {A B C} (f : A  B) (g : B  C) (X : M A) :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
884
    g  f <$> X  g <$> (f <$> X).
885
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
886
887
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_1 {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (y : B) :
    y  f <$> X   x, y = f x  x  X.
888
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
889
890
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_2 {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (x : A) :
    x  X  f x  f <$> X.
891
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
892
893
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_2_alt {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (x : A) (y : B) :
    x  X  y = f x  y  f <$> X.
894
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
895
896
897
898
899

  Lemma elem_of_mapM {A B} (f : A  M B) l k :
    l  mapM f k  Forall2 (λ x y, x  f y) l k.
  Proof.
    split.
900
    - revert l. induction k; set_solver by eauto.
901
    - induction 1; set_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
902
903
904
  Qed.
  Lemma collection_mapM_length {A B} (f : A  M B) l k :
    l  mapM f k  length l = length k.
905
  Proof. revert l; induction k; set_solver by eauto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
906
907
  Lemma elem_of_mapM_fmap {A B} (f : A  B) (g : B  M A) l k :
    Forall (λ x,  y, y  g x  f y = x) l  k  mapM g l  fmap f k = l.
908
  Proof. intros Hl. revert k. induction Hl; set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
  Lemma elem_of_mapM_Forall {A B} (f : A  M B) (P : B  Prop) l k :
    l  mapM f k  Forall (λ x,  y, y  f x  P y) k  Forall P l.
  Proof. rewrite elem_of_mapM. apply Forall2_Forall_l. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_mapM_Forall2_l {A B C} (f : A  M B) (P: B  C  Prop) l1 l2 k :
    l1  mapM f k  Forall2 (λ x y,  z, z  f x  P z y) k l2 
    Forall2 P l1 l2.
  Proof.
    rewrite elem_of_mapM. intros Hl1. revert l2.
    induction Hl1; inversion_clear 1; constructor; auto.
  Qed.
End collection_monad.
920
921
922
923
924
925

(** Finite collections *)
Definition set_finite `{ElemOf A B} (X : B) :=  l : list A,  x, x  X  x  l.

Section finite.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B}.
926
927
  Global Instance set_finite_subseteq :
     Proper (flip () ==> impl) (@set_finite A B _).
928
  Proof. intros X Y HX [l Hl]; exists l; set_solver. Qed.
929
  Global Instance set_finite_proper : Proper (() ==> iff) (@set_finite A B _).
930
  Proof. intros X Y HX; apply exist_proper. by setoid_rewrite HX. Qed.
931
932
933
  Lemma empty_finite : set_finite .
  Proof. by exists []; intros ?; rewrite elem_of_empty. Qed.
  Lemma singleton_finite (x : A) : set_finite {[ x ]}.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
934
  Proof. exists [x]; intros y ->%elem_of_singleton; left. Qed.
935
936
937
938
939
940
  Lemma union_finite X Y : set_finite X  set_finite Y  set_finite (X  Y).
  Proof.
    intros [lX ?] [lY ?]; exists (lX ++ lY); intros x.
    rewrite elem_of_union, elem_of_app; naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Lemma union_finite_inv_l X Y : set_finite (X  Y)  set_finite X.
941
  Proof. intros [l ?]; exists l; set_solver. Qed.
942
  Lemma union_finite_inv_r X Y : set_finite (X  Y)  set_finite Y.
943
  Proof. intros [l ?]; exists l; set_solver. Qed.
944
945
946
947
948
End finite.

Section more_finite.
  Context `{Collection A B}.
  Lemma intersection_finite_l X Y : set_finite X  set_finite (X  Y).
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
949
  Proof. intros [l ?]; exists l; intros x [??]%elem_of_intersection; auto. Qed.
950
  Lemma intersection_finite_r X Y : set_finite Y  set_finite (X  Y).
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
951
  Proof. intros [l ?]; exists l; intros x [??]%elem_of_intersection; auto. Qed.
952
  Lemma difference_finite X Y : set_finite X  set_finite (X  Y).
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
953
  Proof. intros [l ?]; exists l; intros x [??]%elem_of_difference; auto. Qed.
954
955
956
957
  Lemma difference_finite_inv X Y `{ x, Decision (x  Y)} :
    set_finite Y  set_finite (X  Y)  set_finite X.
  Proof.
    intros [l ?] [k ?]; exists (l ++ k).
958
    intros x ?; destruct (decide (x  Y)); rewrite elem_of_app; set_solver.
959
  Qed.
960
End more_finite.
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995

(** Sets of sequences of natural numbers *)
(* The set [seq_seq start len] of natural numbers contains the sequence
[start, start + 1, ..., start + (len-1)]. *)
Fixpoint seq_set `{Singleton nat C, Union C, Empty C} (start len : nat) : C :=
  match len with
  | O => 
  | S len' => {[ start ]}  seq_set (S start) len'
  end.

Section seq_set.
  Context `{SimpleCollection nat C}.
  Implicit Types start len x : nat.

  Lemma elem_of_seq_set start len x :
    x  seq_set start len  start  x < start + len.
  Proof.
    revert start. induction len as [|len IH]; intros start; simpl.
    - rewrite elem_of_empty. omega.
    - rewrite elem_of_union, elem_of_singleton, IH. omega.
  Qed.

  Lemma seq_set_S_disjoint start len : {[ start + len ]}  seq_set start len.
  Proof. intros x. rewrite elem_of_singleton, elem_of_seq_set. omega. Qed.

  Lemma seq_set_S_union start len :
    seq_set start (C:=C) (S len)  {[ start + len ]}  seq_set start len.
  Proof.
    intros x. rewrite elem_of_union, elem_of_singleton, !elem_of_seq_set. omega.
  Qed.

  Lemma seq_set_S_union_L `{!LeibnizEquiv C} start len :
    seq_set start (S len) = {[ start + len ]}  seq_set start len.
  Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply seq_set_S_union. Qed.
End seq_set.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026

(** Mimimal elements *)
Definition minimal `{ElemOf A C} (R : relation A) (x : A) (X : C) : Prop :=
   y, y  X  R y x  y = x.
Instance: Params (@minimal) 5.

Section minimal.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C} {R : relation A}.

  Global Instance minimal_proper x : Proper (@equiv C _ ==> iff) (minimal R x).
  Proof. intros X X' y; unfold minimal; set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma empty_minimal x : minimal R x .
  Proof. unfold minimal; set_solver