- 18 Jan, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 30 Dec, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This was an oversight in !63.
-
- 18 Dec, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 11 Dec, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 04 Dec, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 03 Dec, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
To be consistent with the lemma for the persistence modality.
-
- 16 Nov, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 15 Nov, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 11 Nov, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 02 Nov, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Thanks to Amin Timany for an initial version of the proof.
-
- 01 Nov, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
(□ P) now means (bi_bare (bi_persistently P)). This is motivated by the fact that these two modalities are rarely used separately. In the case of an affine BI, we keep the □ notation. This means that a bi_bare is inserted each time we use □. Hence, a few adaptations need to be done in the proof mode class instances.
-
- 30 Oct, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Otherwise, ownership of cores in our ordered RA model will not be persistent.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 28 Oct, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way, it can be used with `iApply`.
-
- 26 Oct, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Amin Timany authored
-
- 25 Oct, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Replace/remove some occurences of `persistently` into `persistent` where the property instead of the modality is used.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Rename `UCMRA` → `Ucmra` Rename `CMRA` → `Cmra` Rename `OFE` → `Ofe` (`Ofe` was already used partially, but many occurences were missing) Rename `STS` → `Sts` Rename `DRA` → `Dra`
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 27 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This causes a bit of backwards incompatibility: it may now succeed with later stripping below unlocked/TC transparent definitions. This problem actually occured for `wsat`.
-
- 17 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
For obsolete reasons, that no longer seem to apply, we used ∅ as the unit.
-
- 23 Aug, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 17 Aug, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 07 Aug, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- 13 Jun, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It can be derived, thanks to Ales for noticing!
-
- 12 May, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 24 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Instead, I have introduced a type class `Monoid` that is used by the big operators: Class Monoid {M : ofeT} (o : M → M → M) := { monoid_unit : M; monoid_ne : NonExpansive2 o; monoid_assoc : Assoc (≡) o; monoid_comm : Comm (≡) o; monoid_left_id : LeftId (≡) monoid_unit o; monoid_right_id : RightId (≡) monoid_unit o; }. Note that the operation is an argument because we want to have multiple monoids over the same type (for example, on `uPred`s we have monoids for `∗`, `∧`, and `∨`). However, we do bundle the unit because: - If we would not, the unit would appear explicitly in an implicit argument of the big operators, which confuses rewrite. By bundling the unit in the `Monoid` class it is hidden, and hence rewrite won't even see it. - The unit is unique. We could in principle have big ops over setoids instead of OFEs. However, since we do not have a canonical structure for bundled setoids, I did not go that way.
-