tactics.v 80.4 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
6
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
8
Export ident.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  option_bind
12
  beq ascii_beq string_beq positive_beq ident_beq
13
14
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
15
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
16
17
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
18
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19
20
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
21
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
22

23
(** * Misc *)
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
25
Ltac iFresh :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
26
  lazymatch goal with
27
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
28
29
30
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
31
32
33
34
35
36
     eval vm_compute in
       (IAnon (match Hs with
         | [] => 1
         | _ => 1 + foldr Pos.max 1 (omap (maybe IAnon) Hs)
         end))%positive
  | _ => constr:(IAnon 1)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37
38
  end.

39
40
41
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
42
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
43
44
45
46
47
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

48
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
49
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
50
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
51

52
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
53
54
55
56
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

57
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_valid : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
58
59
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

60
61
62
63
64
Lemma as_valid_1 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : φ  P.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.
Lemma as_valid_2 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : P  φ.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
74
(** * Start a proof *)
75
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
76
  lazymatch goal with
77
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
78
79
80
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
81
82
  end.

83
84
(** * Simplification *)
Tactic Notation "iEval" tactic(t) :=
85
  iStartProof;
86
87
  eapply tac_eval;
    [let x := fresh in intros x; t; unfold x; reflexivity|].
88

89
90
91
92
Tactic Notation "iEval" tactic(t) "in" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_eval_in with _ H _ _ _;
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iEval:" H "not found"
93
    |let x := fresh in intros x; t; unfold x; reflexivity
94
95
96
    |env_reflexivity
    |].

97
Tactic Notation "iSimpl" := iEval simpl.
98
Tactic Notation "iSimpl" "in" constr(H) := iEval simpl in H.
99

100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
(* It would be nice to also have an `iSsrRewrite`, however, for this we need to
pass arguments to Ssreflect's `rewrite` like `/= foo /bar` in Ltac, see:

  https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/coq-club/2018-01/msg00000.html

PMP told me (= Robbert) in person that this is not possible today, but may be
possible in Ltac2. *)

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108
109
110
(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
111
112
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
113

114
115
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
116
  | ESelIdent : bool  ident  esel_pat.
117

118
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
119
120
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
121
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
122
123
124
125
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
126
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
127
128
129
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
130
131
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
132
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
133
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
134
135
136
137
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
138
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
139
140
141
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

142
143
144
145
Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
146
147
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
148
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
149
    | [] => idtac
150
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
151
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; go Hs
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
152
    end in
153
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
154

155
156
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
157
158
159

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
160
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
161
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
162
163
164
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
173
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
175
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
176
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
177
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
178
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
179
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
180
  end.
181

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
183
184
185
186
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
187
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
188
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
189
190
191
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
192
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
193
194
195
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
196
197
198
199
200

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
201
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
203
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
204
    |apply _ ||
205
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
206
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
207
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
208

209
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
210
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
211
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
212
213
214
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
215
216
    |intros pat].

217
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
218
  iStartProof;
219
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
220
221
222
223
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
224

225
226
227
228
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
229
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
240
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
241
242
243
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
253
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
261
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
290
    lazymatch Hs with
291
    | [] => idtac
292
293
294
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
295
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
296
    end
297
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

320
321
322
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
323
  lazymatch goal with
324
  | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
325
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
326
      [apply _ ||
327
328
329
330
331
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
332
333
334
335
336
337

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
338
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
339
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
340
341
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
342
343
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
344
345
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
346
347
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
355
      [apply _ ||
356
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
357
358
359
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
360
361
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
362
      [apply _ ||
363
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
364
365
366
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
382
  | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
383
384
385
386
387
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
388
389
  | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
390
391
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
392
(** * Specialize *)
393
394
395
396
397
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
398
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
399
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
400
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
401
402
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

403
(*
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
404
405
406
407
408
There is some hacky stuff going on here: because of Coq bug #6583, unresolved
type classes in the arguments `xs` are resolved at arbitrary moments. Tactics
like `apply`, `split` and `eexists` wrongly trigger type class search to resolve
these holes. To avoid TC being triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine`
at most places instead of `apply`.
409
*)
410
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
411
  let rec go xs :=
412
    lazymatch xs with
413
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
414
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
415
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
416
417
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
418
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
419
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
420
421
422
         |match goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _)); [|]
          (* If the existentially quantified predicate is non-dependent and [x]
Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar
Jacques-Henri Jourdan committed
423
          is a hole, [refine] will generate an additional goal. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
424
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _));[shelve| |]
425
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
426
427
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
428

429
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
430
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
431
    apply _ ||
432
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
435
436
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
437
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
438
       idtac "[IPM] The * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly.";
439
       go H1 pats
440
    | SIdent ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
441
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
442
443
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
444
         |apply _ ||
445
446
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
447
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
448
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
449
450
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
451
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
452
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
453
454
455
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
456
         |env_reflexivity
457
         |done_if d (*goal*)
458
         |go H1 pats]
459
460
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
461
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
462
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
         |apply _ ||
464
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
465
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
466
         |env_reflexivity
467
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
468
         |go H1 pats]
469
470
471
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
472
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
473
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
474
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
475
         |solve_to_wand H1
476
         |lazymatch m with
477
          | GSpatial => apply add_modal_id
478
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
479
          end
480
481
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
482
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
483
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
484
         |go H1 pats]
485
486
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
487
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
488
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
489
         |apply _ ||
490
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
491
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
492
         |env_reflexivity
493
494
495
496
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
497
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
498
499
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
500
          | GSpatial => apply add_modal_id
501
502
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
503
504
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
505
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
506
507
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
508
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
509
510
511
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
512
513
514
515
516
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
517
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
518
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
519
  let t :=
520
521
522
523
524
    match type of t with
    | string => constr:(ITrm (INamed t) hnil "")
    | ident => constr:(ITrm t hnil "")
    | _ => t
    end in
525
526
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
527
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
528
    let H := lazymatch type of H with string => constr:(INamed H) | _ => H end in
529
    lazymatch type of H with
530
    | ident =>
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
539
540
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
541
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
542
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
543
           |apply _ ||
544
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
545
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
546
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
547
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
548
549
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
550
    end
551
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
552
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
553

554
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
555
556
557
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
558

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
559
(** * Pose proof *)
560
561
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
562

563
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
564
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
565
566
567
568
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
569
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
570
  let rec go t :=
571
    let tT := type of t in
572
573
574
575
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
576
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #6583. *)
577
578
579
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
580
581
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"|exact t]
582
    end in
583
  go t.
584

585
586
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
587
588
589
590
591
592
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called.

The tactic [iApply] uses laxy type class inference, so that evars can first be
instantiated by matching with the goal, whereas [iDestruct] does not, because
eliminations may not be performed when type classes have not been resolved.
*)
593
594
595
596
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
597
598
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
599
600
601
602
603
604
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
605
    lazymatch type of t with
606
    | ident =>
607
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
608
609
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
610
         |goal_tac ()]
611
612
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
613
         [iIntoValid t
614
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
615
         |goal_tac ()]
616
    end;
617
618
619
620
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
621
622
623
  end.

(** * Apply *)
624
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
625
626
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
627
      [env_reflexivity
628
629
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
630
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
639
640

(** * Revert *)
641
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
642
643
644
645
646
647
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
648
  iStartProof;
649
650
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
651
652
653
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
654
655

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
656
657
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
658
    | [] => idtac
659
660
661
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
662
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
663
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
664
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
665
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
666
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
667
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
668

669
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
670
  iForallRevert x1.
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
697
    constr(Hs) :=
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
711
712
713

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
714
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
715
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
716
717
718
719
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
720
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
721
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
723
724
725
726
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
727

728
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
729
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
730
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
731
732
733
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
734
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
735
736
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
737
738
739

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
740
  iStartProof;
741
742
743
744
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
745
746

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
747
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
748
  let Hs := words Hs in
749
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
750
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
751
    [apply _ ||
752
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
753
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
754
755
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
756
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
757
758
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
759
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
760
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761
  let Hs := words Hs in
762
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
763
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764
    [apply _ ||
765
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
766
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
767
768
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
769
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
770
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771
772
773
774

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

775
776
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
777
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
778
779
780
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
781
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
782