Commit 4748876b authored by Dan Frumin's avatar Dan Frumin

More comments on PureExec

parent 7a41c8ae
......@@ -169,3 +169,37 @@ One observation is that the easiest (as well as the most numerous) tactics to wr
To that extent we would like to have one generic "pure symbolic reduction" tactic/tactic lemma per level.
This is achieved by writing "open ended" tactic lemmas that are parameterized over a typeclass of pure reductions.
The typeclass ~PureExec φ e1 e2~ says that there is a pure (and deterministic) reduction from ~e1~ to ~e2~ in the language under some (pure) assumption φ.
Using this typeclass and typeclass resolution we can write tactic lemmas that are easy to apply:
Lemma tac_rel_pure_r `{logrelG Σ} K e1 ℶ E1 E2 Δ Γ e e2 eres ϕ t τ :
e = fill K e1 →
PureExec ϕ e1 e2 →
ϕ →
nclose specN ⊆ E1 →
eres = fill K e2 →
(ℶ ⊢ {E1,E2;Δ;Γ} t ≤log≤ (fill K e2) : τ) →
(ℶ ⊢ {E1,E2;Δ;Γ} t ≤log≤ e : τ).
When ~tac_rel_pure~ is applied, it tries to solve the first goal ~e = fill K e1~ by decomposing expression ~e~ in all the possible ways
and trying to unify it with ~e1~. After that it searches for an appropriate ~PureExec~ instance.
The whole process is implemented in the following tactic
Tactic Notation "rel_pure_r" open_constr(ef) :=
rel_reshape_cont_r ltac:(fun K e' =>
unify e' ef;
simple eapply (tac_rel_pure_r K e');
[tac_bind_helper (* e = fill K e1 *)
|apply _ (* PureExec ϕ e1 e2 *)
|try (exact I || reflexivity || tac_rel_done) (* φ *)
|solve_ndisj (* ↑specN ⊆ E1 *)
|simpl; reflexivity (* eres = fill K e2 *)
|simpl_subst/= (* new goal *)])
|| fail "rel_pure_r: cannot find the reduct".
Ignoring the "fail" part, we can see from the outline what is going on in the tactic:
- It tries to reshape the expression on the right hand side in the relational interpretation, until the tactic succeeds.
- It only proceeds with the specific decomposition if ~e = K[e']~ and ~e'~ unifies with ~ef~.
- After that, it applies the tactic lemma and tries to discharge the proof obligations in order
- Sometimes, the dependency ~φ~ in ~PureExec φ e1 e2~ can be discharged trivially by ~reflexivity~ or ~tac_rel_done~.
- We simplify the substitutions in the new goal, in case we do a beta-reduction
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment