Skip to content

GitLab

Commit d6237350 authored by Dan Frumin's avatar Dan Frumin
Browse files
Options

[stack] Finish the stack module refinement

parent a8c7557d
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 162 additions and 70 deletions
_CoqProject
View file @ d6237350
......@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ theories/examples/stack/stack_rules.v
theories/examples/stack/CG_stack.v
theories/examples/stack/FG_stack.v
theories/examples/stack/refinement.v
theories/examples/stack/module_refinement.v
theories/examples/stack/mailbox.v
theories/examples/stack/helping.v
theories/tests/typetest.v
......
theories/examples/stack/module_refinement.v
View file @ d6237350
......@@ -4,17 +4,17 @@ From iris_logrel.examples.stack Require Import
CG_stack FG_stack stack_rules refinement.
Section Mod_refinement.
Context `{logrelG Σ, stackG Σ}.
Context `{HLR : logrelG Σ}.
Notation D := (prodC valC valC -n> iProp Σ).
Implicit Types Δ : listC D.
Import lang.
Program Definition sint `{logrelG Σ, stackG Σ} τi : prodC valC valC -n> iProp Σ := λne vv,
(∃ (l stk stk' : loc), ⌜(vv.2) = (# stk', # l)%V⌝ ∗ ⌜(vv.1) = #stk⌝
∗ inv stackN (sinv τi stk stk' l))%I.
Next Obligation. solve_proper. Qed.
Program Definition sint {LG : logrelG Σ} {Z : stackPreG Σ} τi : prodC valC valC -n> iProp Σ := λne vv,
(∃ γ (l stk stk' : loc), ⌜(vv.2) = (#stk', #l)%V⌝ ∗ ⌜(vv.1) = #stk⌝
∗ inv (stackN .@ (stk,stk')) (sinv' γ τi stk stk' l))%I.
Solve Obligations with solve_proper.
Instance sint_persistent τi vv : PersistentP (sint τi vv).
Instance sint_persistent `{logrelG Σ, stackPreG Σ} τi vv : PersistentP (sint τi vv).
Proof. apply _. Qed.
Lemma interp_subst_up_2 Δ1 Δ2 τ τi :
......@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Section Mod_refinement.
by rewrite -interp_subst_2.
Qed.
Lemma module_refinmenet Δ Γ :
Lemma module_refinement `{SPG : stackPreG Σ} Δ Γ :
{⊤,⊤;Δ;Γ} ⊨ FG_stack.stackmod ≤log≤ CG_stack.stackmod : TForall $ TExists $ TProd (TProd
(TArrow TUnit (TVar 0))
(TArrow (TVar 0) (TSum TUnit (TVar 1))))
......@@ -79,13 +79,29 @@ Section Mod_refinement.
rel_seq_r.
rel_alloc_l as istk "Histk". simpl.
rel_alloc_l as stk "Hstk".
rel_alloc_r as stl' "Hstk'".
rel_alloc_r as stk' "Hstk'".
rel_alloc_r as l "Hl".
rel_vals.
admit.
rewrite -persistentP.
iMod (own_alloc (● (∅ : stackUR))) as (γ) "Hemp"; first done.
pose (SG := StackG Σ _ γ).
iAssert (prestack_owns γ ∅) with "[Hemp]" as "Hoe".
{ rewrite /prestack_owns big_sepM_empty fmap_empty.
iFrame "Hemp". }
iMod (stack_owns_alloc with "[$Hoe $Histk]") as "[Hoe #Histk]".
iAssert (preStackLink γ τi (#istk, FoldV (InjLV (LitV Unit)))) with "[Histk]" as "#HLK".
{ rewrite preStackLink_unfold.
iExists _, _. iSplitR; simpl; trivial.
iFrame "Histk". iLeft. iSplit; trivial. }
iAssert (sinv' γ τi stk stk' l) with "[Hoe Hstk Hstk' HLK Hl]" as "Hinv".
{ iExists _, _, _. by iFrame. }
iMod (inv_alloc (stackN.@(stk,stk')) with "[Hinv]") as "#Hinv".
{ iNext. iExact "Hinv". }
iModIntro.
iExists γ, l, stk, stk'. eauto.
- iApply bin_log_related_arrow_val; eauto.
iAlways. iIntros (? ?) "#Hvv /=".
iDestruct "Hvv" as (l stk stk') "(% & % & #Hinv)".
iDestruct "Hvv" as (γ l stk stk') "(% & % & #Hinv)".
simplify_eq/=.
rel_let_l.
rel_let_r.
......@@ -100,11 +116,15 @@ Section Mod_refinement.
replace (TSum TUnit (TVar 1))
with (TSum TUnit (TVar 0)).[ren (+1)] by done.
iApply bin_log_weaken_2.
by iApply FG_CG_pop_refinement'.
pose (SG := StackG Σ _ γ).
change γ with stack_name.
iApply (FG_CG_pop_refinement' (stackN.@(stk,stk'))).
{ solve_ndisj. }
by rewrite sinv_unfold.
- iApply bin_log_related_arrow_val; eauto.
{ unlock FG_push. done. }
iAlways. iIntros (? ?) "#Hvv /=".
iDestruct "Hvv" as (l stk stk') "(% & % & #Hinv)".
iDestruct "Hvv" as (γ l stk stk') "(% & % & #Hinv)".
simplify_eq/=.
rel_let_r.
Transparent FG_push.
......@@ -121,7 +141,22 @@ Section Mod_refinement.
with ((CG_locked_push $/ LitV stk' $/ LitV l) v')%E; last first.
{ unlock CG_locked_push. simpl_subst/=. done. }
change TUnit with (TUnit.[ren (+1)]).
iApply (FG_CG_push_refinement with "Hinv Hτi").
Admitted.
pose (SG := StackG Σ _ γ).
change γ with stack_name.
iApply (FG_CG_push_refinement (stackN.@(stk,stk')) with "[Hinv] Hτi").
{ solve_ndisj. }
by rewrite sinv_unfold.
Qed.
End Mod_refinement.
Theorem module_ctx_refinement :
∅ ⊨ FG_stack.stackmod ≤ctx≤ CG_stack.stackmod :
TForall $ TExists $ TProd (TProd
(TArrow TUnit (TVar 0))
(TArrow (TVar 0) (TSum TUnit (TVar 1))))
(TArrow (TVar 0) (TArrow (TVar 1) TUnit)).
Proof.
set (Σ := #[logrelΣ; GFunctor (authR stackUR)]).
eapply (logrel_ctxequiv Σ); [solve_closed.. | intros ].
apply module_refinement.
Qed.
theories/examples/stack/refinement.v
View file @ d6237350
......@@ -6,40 +6,52 @@ From iris_logrel.examples.stack Require Import
Definition stackN : namespace := nroot .@ "stack".
Section Stack_refinement.
Context `{logrelG Σ, stackG Σ}.
Context `{logrelG Σ}.
Notation D := (prodC valC valC -n> iProp Σ).
Implicit Types Δ : listC D.
Import lang.
Definition sinv τi stk stk' l' {SH: stackG Σ} : iProp Σ :=
Definition sinv' {SPG : authG Σ stackUR} γ τi stk stk' l' : iProp Σ :=
(∃ (istk : loc) v h, (prestack_owns γ h)
∗ stk' ↦ₛ v
∗ stk ↦ᵢ (FoldV #istk)
∗ preStackLink γ τi (#istk, v)
∗ l' ↦ₛ #false)%I.
Context `{stackG Σ}.
Definition sinv τi stk stk' l : iProp Σ :=
(∃ (istk : loc) v h, (stack_owns h)
∗ stk' ↦ₛ v
∗ stk ↦ᵢ (FoldV #istk)
∗ StackLink τi (#istk, v)
∗ l' ↦ₛ #false)%I.
∗ l ↦ₛ #false)%I.
Lemma sinv_unfold τi stk stk' l :
sinv τi stk stk' l = sinv' stack_name τi stk stk' l.
Proof. reflexivity. Qed.
Ltac close_sinv Hcl asn :=
iMod (Hcl with asn) as "_";
[iNext; rewrite /sinv; iExists _,_,_; by iFrame |]; try iModIntro.
Lemma FG_CG_push_refinement st st' (τi : D) (v v' : val) l {τP : ∀ ww, PersistentP (τi ww)} Γ :
inv stackN (sinv τi st st' l) -∗ τi (v,v') -∗
Lemma FG_CG_push_refinement N st st' (τi : D) (v v' : val) l {τP : ∀ ww, PersistentP (τi ww)} Γ :
N ⊥ logrelN →
inv N (sinv τi st st' l) -∗ τi (v,v') -∗
Γ ⊨ (FG_push $/ (LitV (Loc st))) v ≤log≤ (CG_locked_push $/ (LitV (Loc st')) $/ (LitV (Loc l))) v' : TUnit.
Proof.
iIntros "#Hinv #Hvv'" (Δ).
iIntros (?) "#Hinv #Hvv'". iIntros (Δ).
Transparent FG_push.
unfold FG_push. unlock. simpl_subst/=.
iLöb as "IH".
rel_rec_l.
rel_load_l_atomic.
iInv stackN as (istk w h) "[Hoe [>Hst' [Hst [HLK >Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iInv N as (istk w h) "[Hoe [>Hst' [Hst [HLK >Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iExists (FoldV #istk). iFrame.
iModIntro. iNext. iIntros "Hst".
close_sinv "Hclose" "[Hst Hoe Hst' Hl HLK]". clear w h.
rel_rec_l.
rel_alloc_l as nstk "Hnstk". simpl.
rel_cas_l_atomic.
iInv stackN as (istk' w h) "[Hoe [>Hst' [Hst [HLK >Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iInv N as (istk' w h) "[Hoe [>Hst' [Hst [HLK >Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iExists (FoldV #istk'). iFrame.
iModIntro.
destruct (decide (istk' = istk)) as [e | nestk]; subst.
......@@ -70,12 +82,13 @@ Section Stack_refinement.
by iApply "IH".
Qed.
Lemma FG_CG_pop_refinement' st st' (τi : D) l {τP : ∀ ww, PersistentP (τi ww)} Δ Γ :
inv stackN (sinv τi st st' l) -∗
Lemma FG_CG_pop_refinement' N st st' (τi : D) l {τP : ∀ ww, PersistentP (τi ww)} Δ Γ :
N ⊥ logrelN →
inv N (sinv τi st st' l) -∗
{⊤,⊤;τi::Δ;Γ} ⊨ (FG_pop $/ LitV (Loc st)) #() ≤log≤ (CG_locked_pop $/ LitV (Loc st') $/ LitV (Loc l)) #() : TSum TUnit (TVar 0).
Proof.
Transparent CG_locked_pop FG_pop CG_pop.
iIntros "#Hinv".
iIntros (?) "#Hinv".
iLöb as "IH".
rewrite {2}/FG_pop. unlock. simpl_subst/=.
......@@ -91,7 +104,7 @@ replace ((rec: "pop" "st" <> :=
rel_rec_l.
rel_load_l_atomic.
iInv stackN as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [#HLK Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iInv N as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [#HLK Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iExists _. iFrame.
iModIntro. iNext. iIntros "Hst /=".
rel_rec_l.
......@@ -107,7 +120,7 @@ replace ((rec: "pop" "st" <> :=
iIntros "Hst' Hl".
close_sinv "Hclose" "[Hoe Hst' Hst Hl HLK']". clear h. iClear "HLK'".
rel_load_l_atomic.
iInv stackN as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [#HLK Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iInv N as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [#HLK Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iDestruct (stack_owns_later_open_close with "Hoe Histk") as "[Histk_i Hoe]".
iExists _. iFrame "Histk_i".
iModIntro. iNext. iIntros "Histk_i /=".
......@@ -123,7 +136,7 @@ replace ((rec: "pop" "st" <> :=
iDestruct "HLK" as (y1 z1 y2 z2) "(% & % & Hτ & HLK_tail)"; simplify_eq/=.
close_sinv "Hclose" "[Hoe Hst' Hst Hl HLK']". clear h.
rel_load_l_atomic.
iInv stackN as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [HLK Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iInv N as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [HLK Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iDestruct (stack_owns_later_open_close with "Hoe Histk") as "[Histk_i Hoe]".
iExists _. iFrame.
iModIntro. iNext. iIntros "Histk_i /=".
......@@ -134,7 +147,7 @@ replace ((rec: "pop" "st" <> :=
do 2 (rel_proj_l; rel_rec_l).
close_sinv "Hclose" "[Hoe Hst' Hst Hl HLK]". clear h istk v.
rel_cas_l_atomic.
iInv stackN as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [HLK2 Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iInv N as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [HLK2 Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iExists _. iFrame.
iModIntro.
destruct (decide (istk = istk2)) as [? |NE]; simplify_eq/=.
......@@ -179,10 +192,11 @@ replace ((rec: "pop" "st" <> :=
{ unlock FG_pop CG_locked_pop. simpl_subst/=. solve_closed. }
{ unlock FG_pop CG_locked_pop. simpl_subst/=. solve_closed. }
iAlways. iIntros (? ?) "[% %]". simplify_eq/=.
by iApply FG_CG_pop_refinement'.
iApply (FG_CG_pop_refinement' stackN); eauto.
{ solve_ndisj. }
Qed.
Lemma FG_CG_iter_refinement st st' (τi : D) l Δ {τP : ∀ ww, PersistentP (τi ww)} {SH : stackG Σ} Γ:
Lemma FG_CG_iter_refinement st st' (τi : D) l Δ {τP : ∀ ww, PersistentP (τi ww)} Γ:
inv stackN (sinv τi st st' l) -∗
{⊤,⊤;τi::Δ;Γ} ⊨ FG_read_iter $/ LitV (Loc st) ≤log≤ CG_snap_iter $/ LitV (Loc st') $/ LitV (Loc l) : TArrow (TArrow (TVar 0) TUnit) TUnit.
Proof.
......@@ -234,7 +248,7 @@ replace ((rec: "pop" "st" <> :=
rel_rec_r.
rel_load_l_atomic.
iInv stackN as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [#HLK Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iInv stackN as (istk v h) "[Hoe [Hst' [Hst [#HLK Hl]]]]" "Hclose".
iDestruct (stack_owns_later_open_close with "Hoe Histk") as "[Histk_i Hoe]".
iExists _. iFrame "Histk_i".
iModIntro. iNext. iIntros "Histk_i /=".
......@@ -299,7 +313,7 @@ Section Full_refinement.
end.
(* ∀ α. (α → Unit) * (Unit → Unit + α) * ((α → Unit) → Unit) *)
Lemma FG_CG_stack_refinement `{stackPreG Σ, logrelG Σ} Δ Γ :
Lemma FG_CG_stack_refinement `{SPG: stackPreG Σ, logrelG Σ} Δ Γ :
{⊤,⊤;Δ;Γ} ⊨ FG_stack ≤log≤ CG_stack : TForall (TProd (TProd
(TArrow (TVar 0) TUnit)
(TArrow TUnit (TSum TUnit (TVar 0))))
......@@ -330,10 +344,10 @@ Section Full_refinement.
iMod (own_alloc (● (∅ : stackUR))) as (γ) "Hemp"; first done.
set (istkG := StackG _ _ γ).
change γ with (@stack_name _ istkG).
change (@stack_pre_inG _ H) with (@stack_inG _ istkG).
clearbody istkG. clear γ H1.
change (@stack_pre_inG _ SPG) with (@stack_inG _ istkG).
clearbody istkG. clear γ SPG.
iAssert (@stack_owns _ istkG _ ∅) with "[Hemp]" as "Hoe".
{ rewrite /stack_owns big_sepM_empty fmap_empty.
{ rewrite /stack_owns /prestack_owns big_sepM_empty fmap_empty.
iFrame "Hemp". }
iMod (stack_owns_alloc with "[$Hoe $Histk]") as "[Hoe #Histk]".
iAssert (StackLink τi (#istk, FoldV (InjLV (LitV Unit)))) with "[Histk]" as "#HLK".
......@@ -368,6 +382,7 @@ Section Full_refinement.
replace_r ((CG_locked_push $/ LitV (Loc st') $/ LitV (Loc l)) v2)%E.
{ unlock CG_locked_push. simpl_subst/=. reflexivity. }
iApply (FG_CG_push_refinement with "Hinv Hτ").
{ solve_ndisj. }
- replace_l (FG_pop $/ LitV (Loc st))%E.
{ unlock FG_pop. by simpl_subst/=. }
replace_r (CG_locked_pop $/ LitV (Loc st') $/ LitV (Loc l))%E.
......
theories/examples/stack/stack_rules.v
View file @ d6237350
......@@ -12,67 +12,72 @@ Class stackPreG Σ := StackPreG { stack_pre_inG :> authG Σ stackUR }.
Definition stackΣ : gFunctors := #[authΣ stackUR].
Instance subG_stackPreG {Σ} : subG stackΣ Σ → stackPreG Σ.
Proof. solve_inG. Qed.
(* Instance stackG_stackPreG {Σ} : stackG Σ → stackPreG Σ. *)
(* Proof. intros [S ?]. by constructor. Qed. *)
Definition stack_mapsto `{stackG Σ} (l : loc) (v : val) : iProp Σ :=
own stack_name (◯ {[ l := to_agree v ]}).
Definition prestack_mapsto `{authG Σ stackUR} (γ : gname) (l : loc) (v : val) : iProp Σ :=
own γ (◯ {[ l := to_agree v ]}).
Definition stack_mapsto `{stackG Σ} l v : iProp Σ := prestack_mapsto stack_name l v.
Notation "l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v" := (stack_mapsto l v) (at level 20) : uPred_scope.
Section Rules.
Context `{stackG Σ}.
Section Rules_pre.
Context `{authG Σ stackUR}.
Variable (γ : gname).
Notation D := (prodC valC valC -n> iProp Σ).
Notation "l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v" := (prestack_mapsto γ l v) (at level 20) : uPred_scope.
Global Instance stack_mapsto_persistent l v : PersistentP (l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v).
Proof. apply _. Qed.
(* TODO:this is bad*)
Lemma stack_mapstos_agree_uncurried l v w : l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v ∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ w ⊢ ⌜v = w⌝.
Lemma prestack_mapstos_agree_uncurried l v w : l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v ∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ w ⊢ ⌜v = w⌝.
Proof.
rewrite -own_op -auth_frag_op op_singleton.
change (own stack_name (◯ {[l := to_agree v ⋅ to_agree w]}))
with (auth_own stack_name {[l := to_agree v ⋅ to_agree w]}).
change (own γ (◯ {[l := to_agree v ⋅ to_agree w]}))
with (auth_own γ {[l := to_agree v ⋅ to_agree w]}).
rewrite auth_own_valid. iIntros "Hvalid". iDestruct "Hvalid" as %Hvalid.
rewrite singleton_valid in Hvalid *.
intros Hagree. by rewrite (agree_op_inv' v w Hagree).
Qed.
Lemma stack_mapstos_agree l v w : l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v -∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ w -∗ ⌜v = w⌝.
Lemma prestack_mapstos_agree l v w : l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v -∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ w -∗ ⌜v = w⌝.
Proof.
iIntros "??".
iApply stack_mapstos_agree_uncurried. by iFrame.
iApply prestack_mapstos_agree_uncurried. by iFrame.
Qed.
(* stacklink Q := {((Loc l), nil) ∣ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ (InjL #()) }
∪ {((Loc l), cons y2 z2) ∣ ∃ y1 z1, l ↦ˢᵗᵏ (y1, z1)
∗ (y1, y2) ∈ Q
∗ ▷ stacklink Q (z1, z2) }*)
Program Definition StackLink_pre (Q : D) : D -n> D := λne P v,
Program Definition preStackLink_pre (Q : D) : D -n> D := λne P v,
(∃ (l : loc) w, ⌜v.1 = # l⌝ ∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ w ∗
((⌜w = InjLV #()⌝ ∧ ⌜v.2 = FoldV (InjLV #())⌝) ∨
(∃ y1 z1 y2 z2, ⌜w = InjRV (PairV y1 (FoldV z1))⌝ ∗
⌜v.2 = FoldV (InjRV (PairV y2 z2))⌝ ∗ Q (y1, y2) ∗ ▷ P(z1, z2))))%I.
Solve Obligations with solve_proper.
Global Instance StackLink_pre_contractive Q : Contractive (StackLink_pre Q).
Global Instance StackLink_pre_contractive Q : Contractive (preStackLink_pre Q).
Proof. solve_contractive. Qed.
Definition StackLink (Q : D) : D := fixpoint (StackLink_pre Q).
Definition preStackLink (Q : D) : D := fixpoint (preStackLink_pre Q).
Lemma StackLink_unfold Q v :
StackLink Q v ≡ (∃ (l : loc) w,
Lemma preStackLink_unfold Q v :
preStackLink Q v ≡ (∃ (l : loc) w,
⌜v.1 = # l⌝ ∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ w ∗
((⌜w = InjLV #()⌝ ∧ ⌜v.2 = FoldV (InjLV #())⌝) ∨
(∃ y1 z1 y2 z2, ⌜w = InjRV (PairV y1 (FoldV z1))⌝
∗ ⌜v.2 = FoldV (InjRV (PairV y2 z2))⌝
∗ Q (y1, y2) ∗ ▷ StackLink Q (z1, z2))))%I.
Proof. by rewrite {1}/StackLink fixpoint_unfold. Qed.
∗ Q (y1, y2) ∗ ▷ preStackLink Q (z1, z2))))%I.
Proof. by rewrite {1}/preStackLink fixpoint_unfold. Qed.
Global Opaque StackLink. (* So that we can only use the unfold above. *)
Global Opaque preStackLink. (* So that we can only use the unfold above. *)
Global Instance StackLink_persistent (Q : D) v `{∀ vw, PersistentP (Q vw)} :
PersistentP (StackLink Q v).
Global Instance preStackLink_persistent (Q : D) v `{∀ vw, PersistentP (Q vw)} :
PersistentP (preStackLink Q v).
Proof.
iIntros "H". iLöb as "IH" forall (v). rewrite StackLink_unfold.
iIntros "H". iLöb as "IH" forall (v). rewrite preStackLink_unfold.
iDestruct "H" as (l w) "[% [#Hl [[% %]|Hr]]]"; subst.
{ iExists l, _; iAlways; eauto. }
iDestruct "Hr" as (y1 z1 y2 z2) "[% [% [#HQ Hrec]]]"; subst.
......@@ -87,14 +92,12 @@ Section Rules.
h !! i = None → ● h ~~> ● (<[i := to_agree v]> h) ⋅ ◯ {[i := to_agree v]}.
Proof. intros. by apply auth_update_alloc, alloc_singleton_local_update. Qed.
Context `{logrelG Σ}.
Definition stack_owns (h : gmap loc val) : iProp Σ :=
(own stack_name (● (to_agree <$> h : stackUR))
Definition prestack_owns `{logrelG Σ} (h : gmap loc val) : iProp Σ :=
(own γ (● (to_agree <$> h : stackUR))
∗ [∗ map] l ↦ v ∈ h, l ↦ᵢ v)%I.
Lemma stack_owns_alloc h l v :
stack_owns h ∗ l ↦ᵢ v ==∗ stack_owns (<[l := v]> h) ∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v.
Lemma prestack_owns_alloc `{logrelG Σ} h l v :
prestack_owns h ∗ l ↦ᵢ v ==∗ prestack_owns (<[l := v]> h) ∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v.
Proof.
iIntros "[[Hown Hall] Hl]".
iDestruct (own_valid with "Hown") as %Hvalid.
......@@ -107,14 +110,14 @@ Section Rules.
eapply (alloc_singleton_local_update _ l (to_agree v)).
- rewrite lookup_fmap Hhl. by compute.
- by compute.
- iModIntro. rewrite /stack_owns. rewrite fmap_insert.
- iModIntro. rewrite /prestack_owns. rewrite fmap_insert.
iFrame "Hown Hl'".
iApply big_sepM_insert; eauto.
by iFrame. }
Qed.
Lemma stack_owns_open_close h l v :
stack_owns h -∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v -∗ l ↦ᵢ v ∗ (l ↦ᵢ v -∗ stack_owns h).
Lemma prestack_owns_open_close `{logrelG Σ} h l v :
prestack_owns h -∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v -∗ l ↦ᵢ v ∗ (l ↦ᵢ v -∗ prestack_owns h).
Proof.
iIntros "[Howns Hls] Hl".
iDestruct (own_valid_2 with "Howns Hl")
......@@ -125,10 +128,48 @@ Section Rules.
move=> [v' [Hl Hav]]; subst.
apply to_agree_included in Hav'; setoid_subst.
iDestruct (big_sepM_lookup_acc with "Hls") as "[$ Hclose]"; first done.
iIntros "Hl'". rewrite /stack_owns. iFrame "Howns". by iApply "Hclose".
iIntros "Hl'". rewrite /prestack_owns. iFrame "Howns". by iApply "Hclose".
Qed.
Lemma stack_owns_later_open_close h l v :
Lemma prestack_owns_later_open_close `{logrelG Σ} h l v :
▷ prestack_owns h -∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v -∗ ▷ (l ↦ᵢ v ∗ (l ↦ᵢ v -∗ prestack_owns h)).
Proof. iIntros "H1 H2". iNext; by iApply (prestack_owns_open_close with "H1"). Qed.
End Rules_pre.
Section Rules.
Context `{stackG Σ}.
Notation D := (prodC valC valC -n> iProp Σ).
Definition stack_owns `{logrelG Σ} := prestack_owns stack_name.
Lemma stack_mapstos_agree l v w : l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v -∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ w -∗ ⌜v = w⌝.
Proof. apply prestack_mapstos_agree. Qed.
Lemma stack_owns_alloc `{logrelG Σ} h l v :
stack_owns h ∗ l ↦ᵢ v ==∗ stack_owns (<[l := v]> h) ∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v.
Proof. apply prestack_owns_alloc. Qed.
Lemma stack_owns_open_close `{logrelG Σ} h l v :
stack_owns h -∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v -∗ l ↦ᵢ v ∗ (l ↦ᵢ v -∗ stack_owns h).
Proof. apply prestack_owns_open_close. Qed.
Lemma stack_owns_later_open_close `{logrelG Σ} h l v :
▷ stack_owns h -∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ v -∗ ▷ (l ↦ᵢ v ∗ (l ↦ᵢ v -∗ stack_owns h)).
Proof. iIntros "H1 H2". iNext; by iApply (stack_owns_open_close with "H1"). Qed.
Proof. apply prestack_owns_later_open_close. Qed.
Definition StackLink Q v := preStackLink stack_name Q v.
Lemma StackLink_unfold Q v :
StackLink Q v ≡ (∃ (l : loc) w,
⌜v.1 = # l⌝ ∗ l ↦ˢᵗᵏ w ∗
((⌜w = InjLV #()⌝ ∧ ⌜v.2 = FoldV (InjLV #())⌝) ∨
(∃ y1 z1 y2 z2, ⌜w = InjRV (PairV y1 (FoldV z1))⌝
∗ ⌜v.2 = FoldV (InjRV (PairV y2 z2))⌝
∗ Q (y1, y2) ∗ ▷ StackLink Q (z1, z2))))%I.
Proof. by rewrite /StackLink preStackLink_unfold. Qed.
Global Instance StackLink_persistent (Q : D) v `{∀ vw, PersistentP (Q vw)} :
PersistentP (StackLink Q v).
Proof. apply _. Qed.
Global Opaque StackLink.
End Rules.
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment