- 06 Mar, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 05 Mar, 2016 2 commits
- 04 Mar, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 02 Mar, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This cleans up some ad-hoc stuff and prepares for a generalization of saved propositions.
-
- 01 Mar, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 27 Feb, 2016 2 commits
- 26 Feb, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 25 Feb, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
The changes are probably necessary because rewrite now tries harder not to instantiate evars, which it always said it would not do.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It now turns setoid equalities into Leibniz equalities when possible, and substitutes those.
-
- 24 Feb, 2016 8 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
* Use sig instead of sigT: the proof is a Prop after all * Tweak implicit arguments * Shorten proof of sigma
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way it behaves better for discrete CMRAs.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 23 Feb, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
I am now also using reification to obtain the indexes corresponding to the stuff we want to cancel instead of relying on matching using Ltac.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 22 Feb, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Also, give all these global functors the suffix GF to avoid shadowing such as we had with authF. And add some type annotations for clarity.
-
Ralf Jung authored
I added a new typeclass "inGF" to witness that a particular *functor* is part of \Sigma. inG, in contrast, witnesses a particular *CMRA* to be in there, after applying the functor to "\later iProp". inGF can be inferred if that functor is consed to the head of \Sigma, and it is preserved by consing a new functor to \Sigma. This is not the case for inG since the recursive occurence of \Sigma also changes. For evry construction (auth, sts, saved_prop), there is an instance infering the respective authG, stsG, savedPropG from an inGF. There is also a global inG_inGF, but Coq is unable to use it. I tried to instead have *only* inGF, since having both typeclasses seemed weird. However, then the actual type that e.g. "own" is about is the result of applying a functor, and Coq entirely fails to infer anything. I had to add a few type annotations in heap.v, because Coq tried to use the "authG_inGF" instance before the A got fixed, and ended up looping and expanding endlessly on that proof of timelessness. This does not seem entirely unreasonable, I was honestly surprised Coq was able to infer the types previously.
-
- 20 Feb, 2016 2 commits
- 19 Feb, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 18 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This avoids ambiguity with P and Q that we were using before for both uPreds/iProps and indexed uPreds/iProps.
-
- 17 Feb, 2016 2 commits
- 16 Feb, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
The singleton maps notation is now also more consistent with the insert <[_ := _]> _ notation for maps.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
* These type classes bundle an identifier into the global CMRA with a proof that the identifier points to the correct CMRA. Bundling allows us to get rid of many arguments everywhere. * I have setup the type classes so that we no longer have to keep track of the global CMRA identifiers. These are implicit and resolved automatically. * For heap I am also bundling the name of the heap RA instance. There always should be at most one heap instance so this does not introduce ambiguities. * We now have a "maps to" notation!
-
Ralf Jung authored
Whenever clients get this stuff out of invariants, this is much more convenient for them, compared to applying timelessness themselves. On the other hand, this makes the test proofs slightly more annoying, since they have to manually strip away that later. I am not sure if it is worth having separate lemmas (well, tactics, soon) for that. Eventually, we should have a tactic which, given "... * P * ... |- ... * \later^n P * ...", automatically gets rid of the P.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
We now have: Π★{map Q } ... Π★{set Q } ... to differentiate between sets and maps.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
With nicely overloaded notations for sets and maps.
-
- 15 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-