change wp notation

barrier/client.v

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Section client.
   Local Notation iProp := (iPropG heap_lang Σ).
 
   Definition y_inv q y : iProp :=
-    (∃ f : val, y ↦{q} f ★ □ ∀ n : Z, || f #n {{ λ v, v = #(n + 42) }})%I.
+    (∃ f : val, y ↦{q} f ★ □ ∀ n : Z, #> f #n {{ λ v, v = #(n + 42) }})%I.
 
   Lemma y_inv_split q y :
     y_inv q y ⊑ (y_inv (q/2) y ★ y_inv (q/2) y).
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Section client.
 
   Lemma worker_safe q (n : Z) (b y : loc) :
     (heap_ctx heapN ★ recv heapN N b (y_inv q y))
-      ⊑ || worker n (%b) (%y) {{ λ _, True }}.
+      ⊑ #> worker n (%b) (%y) {{ λ _, True }}.
   Proof.
     rewrite /worker. wp_lam. wp_let. ewp apply wait_spec.
     rewrite comm. apply sep_mono_r. apply wand_intro_l.
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Section client.
   Qed.
 
   Lemma client_safe :
-    heapN ⊥ N → heap_ctx heapN ⊑ || client {{ λ _, True }}.
+    heapN ⊥ N → heap_ctx heapN ⊑ #> client {{ λ _, True }}.
   Proof.
     intros ?. rewrite /client.
     (ewp eapply wp_alloc); eauto with I. strip_later. apply forall_intro=>y.
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Section client.
     apply sep_mono_r. apply forall_intro=>b. apply wand_intro_l. 
     wp_let. ewp eapply wp_fork.
     rewrite [heap_ctx _]always_sep_dup !assoc [(_ ★ heap_ctx _)%I]comm.
-    rewrite [(|| _ {{ _ }} ★ _)%I]comm -!assoc assoc. apply sep_mono;last first.
+    rewrite [(#> _ {{ _ }} ★ _)%I]comm -!assoc assoc. apply sep_mono;last first.
     { (* The original thread, the sender. *)
       wp_seq. (ewp eapply wp_store); eauto with I. strip_later.
       rewrite assoc [(_ ★ y ↦ _)%I]comm. apply sep_mono_r, wand_intro_l.

barrier/proof.v

@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Qed.
 Lemma newbarrier_spec (P : iProp) (Φ : val → iProp) :
   heapN ⊥ N →
   (heap_ctx heapN ★ ∀ l, recv l P ★ send l P -★ Φ (%l))
-  ⊑ || newbarrier #() {{ Φ }}.
+  ⊑ #> newbarrier #() {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros HN. rewrite /newbarrier. wp_seq.
   rewrite -wp_pvs. wp eapply wp_alloc; eauto with I ndisj.
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ Proof.
 Qed.
 
 Lemma signal_spec l P (Φ : val → iProp) :
-  (send l P ★ P ★ Φ #()) ⊑ || signal (%l) {{ Φ }}.
+  (send l P ★ P ★ Φ #()) ⊑ #> signal (%l) {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite /signal /send /barrier_ctx. rewrite sep_exist_r.
   apply exist_elim=>γ. rewrite -!assoc. apply const_elim_sep_l=>?. wp_let.
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ Proof.
 Qed.
 
 Lemma wait_spec l P (Φ : val → iProp) :
-  (recv l P ★ (P -★ Φ #())) ⊑ || wait (%l) {{ Φ }}.
+  (recv l P ★ (P -★ Φ #())) ⊑ #> wait (%l) {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rename P into R. wp_rec.
   rewrite {1}/recv /barrier_ctx. rewrite !sep_exist_r.

heap_lang/derived.v

@@ -19,36 +19,36 @@ Implicit Types Φ : val → iProp heap_lang Σ.
 (** Proof rules for the sugar *)
 Lemma wp_lam E x ef e v Φ :
   to_val e = Some v →
-  ▷ || subst' x e ef @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || App (Lam x ef) e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> subst' x e ef @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> App (Lam x ef) e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. intros. by rewrite -wp_rec. Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_let E x e1 e2 v Φ :
   to_val e1 = Some v →
-  ▷ || subst' x e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || Let x e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> subst' x e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> Let x e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. apply wp_lam. Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_seq E e1 e2 v Φ :
   to_val e1 = Some v →
-  ▷ || e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || Seq e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> Seq e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. intros ?. by rewrite -wp_let. Qed.
 
-Lemma wp_skip E Φ : ▷ Φ (LitV LitUnit) ⊑ || Skip @ E {{ Φ }}.
+Lemma wp_skip E Φ : ▷ Φ (LitV LitUnit) ⊑ #> Skip @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. rewrite -wp_seq // -wp_value //. Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_match_inl E e0 v0 x1 e1 x2 e2 Φ :
   to_val e0 = Some v0 →
-  ▷ || subst' x1 e0 e1 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || Match (InjL e0) x1 e1 x2 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> subst' x1 e0 e1 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> Match (InjL e0) x1 e1 x2 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. intros. by rewrite -wp_case_inl // -[X in _ ⊑ X]later_intro -wp_let. Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_match_inr E e0 v0 x1 e1 x2 e2 Φ :
   to_val e0 = Some v0 →
-  ▷ || subst' x2 e0 e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || Match (InjR e0) x1 e1 x2 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> subst' x2 e0 e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> Match (InjR e0) x1 e1 x2 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. intros. by rewrite -wp_case_inr // -[X in _ ⊑ X]later_intro -wp_let. Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_le E (n1 n2 : Z) P Φ :
   (n1 ≤ n2 → P ⊑ ▷ Φ (LitV (LitBool true))) →
   (n2 < n1 → P ⊑ ▷ Φ (LitV (LitBool false))) →
-  P ⊑ || BinOp LeOp (Lit (LitInt n1)) (Lit (LitInt n2)) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  P ⊑ #> BinOp LeOp (Lit (LitInt n1)) (Lit (LitInt n2)) @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -wp_bin_op //; [].
   destruct (bool_decide_reflect (n1 ≤ n2)); by eauto with omega.
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Qed.
 Lemma wp_lt E (n1 n2 : Z) P Φ :
   (n1 < n2 → P ⊑ ▷ Φ (LitV (LitBool true))) →
   (n2 ≤ n1 → P ⊑ ▷ Φ (LitV (LitBool false))) →
-  P ⊑ || BinOp LtOp (Lit (LitInt n1)) (Lit (LitInt n2)) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  P ⊑ #> BinOp LtOp (Lit (LitInt n1)) (Lit (LitInt n2)) @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -wp_bin_op //; [].
   destruct (bool_decide_reflect (n1 < n2)); by eauto with omega.
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Qed.
 Lemma wp_eq E (n1 n2 : Z) P Φ :
   (n1 = n2 → P ⊑ ▷ Φ (LitV (LitBool true))) →
   (n1 ≠ n2 → P ⊑ ▷ Φ (LitV (LitBool false))) →
-  P ⊑ || BinOp EqOp (Lit (LitInt n1)) (Lit (LitInt n2)) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  P ⊑ #> BinOp EqOp (Lit (LitInt n1)) (Lit (LitInt n2)) @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -wp_bin_op //; [].
   destruct (bool_decide_reflect (n1 = n2)); by eauto with omega.

heap_lang/heap.v

@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Section heap.
     to_val e = Some v →
     P ⊑ heap_ctx N → nclose N ⊆ E →
     P ⊑ (▷ ∀ l, l ↦ v -★ Φ (LocV l)) →
-    P ⊑ || Alloc e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+    P ⊑ #> Alloc e @ E {{ Φ }}.
   Proof.
     rewrite /heap_ctx /heap_inv=> ??? HP.
     trans (|={E}=> auth_own heap_name ∅ ★ P)%I.
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ Section heap.
   Lemma wp_load N E l q v P Φ :
     P ⊑ heap_ctx N → nclose N ⊆ E →
     P ⊑ (▷ l ↦{q} v ★ ▷ (l ↦{q} v -★ Φ v)) →
-    P ⊑ || Load (Loc l) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+    P ⊑ #> Load (Loc l) @ E {{ Φ }}.
   Proof.
     rewrite /heap_ctx /heap_inv=> ?? HPΦ.
     apply (auth_fsa' heap_inv (wp_fsa _) id)
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ Section heap.
     to_val e = Some v →
     P ⊑ heap_ctx N → nclose N ⊆ E →
     P ⊑ (▷ l ↦ v' ★ ▷ (l ↦ v -★ Φ (LitV LitUnit))) →
-    P ⊑ || Store (Loc l) e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+    P ⊑ #> Store (Loc l) e @ E {{ Φ }}.
   Proof.
     rewrite /heap_ctx /heap_inv=> ??? HPΦ.
     apply (auth_fsa' heap_inv (wp_fsa _) (alter (λ _, Frac 1 (DecAgree v)) l))
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ Section heap.
     to_val e1 = Some v1 → to_val e2 = Some v2 → v' ≠ v1 →
     P ⊑ heap_ctx N → nclose N ⊆ E →
     P ⊑ (▷ l ↦{q} v' ★ ▷ (l ↦{q} v' -★ Φ (LitV (LitBool false)))) →
-    P ⊑ || Cas (Loc l) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+    P ⊑ #> Cas (Loc l) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
   Proof.
     rewrite /heap_ctx /heap_inv=>????? HPΦ.
     apply (auth_fsa' heap_inv (wp_fsa _) id)
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ Section heap.
     to_val e1 = Some v1 → to_val e2 = Some v2 →
     P ⊑ heap_ctx N → nclose N ⊆ E →
     P ⊑ (▷ l ↦ v1 ★ ▷ (l ↦ v2 -★ Φ (LitV (LitBool true)))) →
-    P ⊑ || Cas (Loc l) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+    P ⊑ #> Cas (Loc l) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
   Proof.
     rewrite /heap_ctx /heap_inv=> ???? HPΦ.
     apply (auth_fsa' heap_inv (wp_fsa _) (alter (λ _, Frac 1 (DecAgree v2)) l))

heap_lang/lifting.v

@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ Implicit Types ef : option (expr []).
 
 (** Bind. *)
 Lemma wp_bind {E e} K Φ :
-  || e @ E {{ λ v, || fill K (of_val v) @ E {{ Φ }}}} ⊑ || fill K e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  #> e @ E {{ λ v, #> fill K (of_val v) @ E {{ Φ }}}} ⊑ #> fill K e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. apply weakestpre.wp_bind. Qed.
 
 (** Base axioms for core primitives of the language: Stateful reductions. *)
 Lemma wp_alloc_pst E σ e v Φ :
   to_val e = Some v →
   (▷ ownP σ ★ ▷ (∀ l, σ !! l = None ∧ ownP (<[l:=v]>σ) -★ Φ (LocV l)))
-  ⊑ || Alloc e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ⊑ #> Alloc e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   (* TODO RJ: This works around ssreflect bug #22. *)
   intros. set (φ v' σ' ef := ∃ l,
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_load_pst E σ l v Φ :
   σ !! l = Some v →
-  (▷ ownP σ ★ ▷ (ownP σ -★ Φ v)) ⊑ || Load (Loc l) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  (▷ ownP σ ★ ▷ (ownP σ -★ Φ v)) ⊑ #> Load (Loc l) @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_atomic_det_step σ v σ None) ?right_id //;
     last by intros; inv_step; eauto using to_of_val.
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Qed.
 Lemma wp_store_pst E σ l e v v' Φ :
   to_val e = Some v → σ !! l = Some v' →
   (▷ ownP σ ★ ▷ (ownP (<[l:=v]>σ) -★ Φ (LitV LitUnit)))
-  ⊑ || Store (Loc l) e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ⊑ #> Store (Loc l) e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_atomic_det_step σ (LitV LitUnit) (<[l:=v]>σ) None)
     ?right_id //; last by intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Qed.
 Lemma wp_cas_fail_pst E σ l e1 v1 e2 v2 v' Φ :
   to_val e1 = Some v1 → to_val e2 = Some v2 → σ !! l = Some v' → v' ≠ v1 →
   (▷ ownP σ ★ ▷ (ownP σ -★ Φ (LitV $ LitBool false)))
-  ⊑ || Cas (Loc l) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ⊑ #> Cas (Loc l) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_atomic_det_step σ (LitV $ LitBool false) σ None)
     ?right_id //; last by intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Qed.
 Lemma wp_cas_suc_pst E σ l e1 v1 e2 v2 Φ :
   to_val e1 = Some v1 → to_val e2 = Some v2 → σ !! l = Some v1 →
   (▷ ownP σ ★ ▷ (ownP (<[l:=v2]>σ) -★ Φ (LitV $ LitBool true)))
-  ⊑ || Cas (Loc l) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ⊑ #> Cas (Loc l) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_atomic_det_step σ (LitV $ LitBool true)
     (<[l:=v2]>σ) None) ?right_id //; last by intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Qed.
 
 (** Base axioms for core primitives of the language: Stateless reductions *)
 Lemma wp_fork E e Φ :
-  (▷ Φ (LitV LitUnit) ★ ▷ || e {{ λ _, True }}) ⊑ || Fork e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  (▷ Φ (LitV LitUnit) ★ ▷ #> e {{ λ _, True }}) ⊑ #> Fork e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (Fork e) (Lit LitUnit) (Some e)) //=;
     last by intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_rec E f x e1 e2 v Φ :
   to_val e2 = Some v →
-  ▷ || subst' x e2 (subst' f (Rec f x e1) e1) @ E {{ Φ }}
-  ⊑ || App (Rec f x e1) e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> subst' x e2 (subst' f (Rec f x e1) e1) @ E {{ Φ }}
+  ⊑ #> App (Rec f x e1) e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (App _ _)
     (subst' x e2 (subst' f (Rec f x e1) e1)) None) //= ?right_id;
@@ -95,13 +95,13 @@ Qed.
 Lemma wp_rec' E f x erec e1 e2 v2 Φ :
   e1 = Rec f x erec →
   to_val e2 = Some v2 →
-  ▷ || subst' x e2 (subst' f e1 erec) @ E {{ Φ }}
-  ⊑ || App e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> subst' x e2 (subst' f e1 erec) @ E {{ Φ }}
+  ⊑ #> App e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. intros ->. apply wp_rec. Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_un_op E op l l' Φ :
   un_op_eval op l = Some l' →
-  ▷ Φ (LitV l') ⊑ || UnOp op (Lit l) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ Φ (LitV l') ⊑ #> UnOp op (Lit l) @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (UnOp op _) (Lit l') None)
     ?right_id -?wp_value //; intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -109,21 +109,21 @@ Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_bin_op E op l1 l2 l' Φ :
   bin_op_eval op l1 l2 = Some l' →
-  ▷ Φ (LitV l') ⊑ || BinOp op (Lit l1) (Lit l2) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ Φ (LitV l') ⊑ #> BinOp op (Lit l1) (Lit l2) @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros Heval. rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (BinOp op _ _) (Lit l') None)
     ?right_id -?wp_value //; intros; inv_step; eauto.
 Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_if_true E e1 e2 Φ :
-  ▷ || e1 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || If (Lit (LitBool true)) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> e1 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> If (Lit (LitBool true)) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (If _ _ _) e1 None)
     ?right_id //; intros; inv_step; eauto.
 Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_if_false E e1 e2 Φ :
-  ▷ || e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || If (Lit (LitBool false)) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> If (Lit (LitBool false)) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (If _ _ _) e2 None)
     ?right_id //; intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_fst E e1 v1 e2 v2 Φ :
   to_val e1 = Some v1 → to_val e2 = Some v2 →
-  ▷ Φ v1 ⊑ || Fst (Pair e1 e2) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ Φ v1 ⊑ #> Fst (Pair e1 e2) @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (Fst _) e1 None)
     ?right_id -?wp_value //; intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_snd E e1 v1 e2 v2 Φ :
   to_val e1 = Some v1 → to_val e2 = Some v2 →
-  ▷ Φ v2 ⊑ || Snd (Pair e1 e2) @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ Φ v2 ⊑ #> Snd (Pair e1 e2) @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (Snd _) e2 None)
     ?right_id -?wp_value //; intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_case_inl E e0 v0 e1 e2 Φ :
   to_val e0 = Some v0 →
-  ▷ || App e1 e0 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || Case (InjL e0) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> App e1 e0 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> Case (InjL e0) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (Case _ _ _)
     (App e1 e0) None) ?right_id //; intros; inv_step; eauto.
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Qed.
 
 Lemma wp_case_inr E e0 v0 e1 e2 Φ :
   to_val e0 = Some v0 →
-  ▷ || App e2 e0 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || Case (InjR e0) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ #> App e2 e0 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> Case (InjR e0) e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_det_step (Case _ _ _)
     (App e2 e0) None) ?right_id //; intros; inv_step; eauto.

program_logic/hoare.v

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ From program_logic Require Export weakestpre viewshifts.
 
 Definition ht {Λ Σ} (E : coPset) (P : iProp Λ Σ)
     (e : expr Λ) (Φ : val Λ → iProp Λ Σ) : iProp Λ Σ :=
-  (□ (P → || e @ E {{ Φ }}))%I.
+  (□ (P → #> e @ E {{ Φ }}))%I.
 Instance: Params (@ht) 3.
 
 Notation "{{ P } } e @ E {{ Φ } }" := (ht E P e Φ)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Global Instance ht_mono' E :
   Proper (flip (⊑) ==> eq ==> pointwise_relation _ (⊑) ==> (⊑)) (@ht Λ Σ E).
 Proof. solve_proper. Qed.
 
-Lemma ht_alt E P Φ e : (P ⊑ || e @ E {{ Φ }}) → {{ P }} e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+Lemma ht_alt E P Φ e : (P ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}) → {{ P }} e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros; rewrite -{1}always_const. apply: always_intro. apply impl_intro_l.
   by rewrite always_const right_id.

program_logic/invariants.v

@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ Proof. intros. by apply: (inv_fsa pvs_fsa). Qed.
 Lemma wp_open_close E e N P Φ R :
   atomic e → nclose N ⊆ E →
   R ⊑ inv N P →
-  R ⊑ (▷ P -★ || e @ E ∖ nclose N {{ λ v, ▷ P ★ Φ v }}) →
-  R ⊑ || e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  R ⊑ (▷ P -★ #> e @ E ∖ nclose N {{ λ v, ▷ P ★ Φ v }}) →
+  R ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. intros. by apply: (inv_fsa (wp_fsa e)). Qed.
 
 Lemma inv_alloc N P : ▷ P ⊑ pvs N N (inv N P).

program_logic/lifting.v

@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ Lemma wp_lift_step E1 E2
   reducible e1 σ1 →
   (∀ e2 σ2 ef, prim_step e1 σ1 e2 σ2 ef → φ e2 σ2 ef) →
   (|={E2,E1}=> ▷ ownP σ1 ★ ▷ ∀ e2 σ2 ef,
-    (■ φ e2 σ2 ef ∧ ownP σ2) -★ |={E1,E2}=> || e2 @ E2 {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef)
-  ⊑ || e1 @ E2 {{ Φ }}.
+    (■ φ e2 σ2 ef ∧ ownP σ2) -★ |={E1,E2}=> #> e2 @ E2 {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef)
+  ⊑ #> e1 @ E2 {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros ? He Hsafe Hstep. rewrite pvs_eq wp_eq.
   uPred.unseal; split=> n r ? Hvs; constructor; auto.
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Lemma wp_lift_pure_step E (φ : expr Λ → option (expr Λ) → Prop) Φ e1 :
   to_val e1 = None →
   (∀ σ1, reducible e1 σ1) →
   (∀ σ1 e2 σ2 ef, prim_step e1 σ1 e2 σ2 ef → σ1 = σ2 ∧ φ e2 ef) →
-  (▷ ∀ e2 ef, ■ φ e2 ef → || e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef) ⊑ || e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  (▷ ∀ e2 ef, ■ φ e2 ef → #> e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef) ⊑ #> e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros He Hsafe Hstep; rewrite wp_eq; uPred.unseal.
   split=> n r ? Hwp; constructor; auto.
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Lemma wp_lift_atomic_step {E Φ} e1
   (∀ e2 σ2 ef,
     prim_step e1 σ1 e2 σ2 ef → ∃ v2, to_val e2 = Some v2 ∧ φ v2 σ2 ef) →
   (▷ ownP σ1 ★ ▷ ∀ v2 σ2 ef, ■ φ v2 σ2 ef ∧ ownP σ2 -★ Φ v2 ★ wp_fork ef)
-  ⊑ || e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ⊑ #> e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_step E E (λ e2 σ2 ef, ∃ v2,
     to_val e2 = Some v2 ∧ φ v2 σ2 ef) _ e1 σ1) //; [].
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Lemma wp_lift_atomic_det_step {E Φ e1} σ1 v2 σ2 ef :
   reducible e1 σ1 →
   (∀ e2' σ2' ef', prim_step e1 σ1 e2' σ2' ef' →
     σ2 = σ2' ∧ to_val e2' = Some v2 ∧ ef = ef') →
-  (▷ ownP σ1 ★ ▷ (ownP σ2 -★ Φ v2 ★ wp_fork ef)) ⊑ || e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  (▷ ownP σ1 ★ ▷ (ownP σ2 -★ Φ v2 ★ wp_fork ef)) ⊑ #> e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros. rewrite -(wp_lift_atomic_step _ (λ v2' σ2' ef',
     σ2 = σ2' ∧ v2 = v2' ∧ ef = ef') σ1) //; last naive_solver.
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Lemma wp_lift_pure_det_step {E Φ} e1 e2 ef :
   to_val e1 = None →
   (∀ σ1, reducible e1 σ1) →
   (∀ σ1 e2' σ2 ef', prim_step e1 σ1 e2' σ2 ef' → σ1 = σ2 ∧ e2 = e2' ∧ ef = ef')→
-  ▷ (|| e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef) ⊑ || e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  ▷ (#> e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef) ⊑ #> e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   intros.
   rewrite -(wp_lift_pure_step E (λ e2' ef', e2 = e2' ∧ ef = ef') _ e1) //=.

program_logic/weakestpre.v

@@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ Definition wp_eq : @wp = @wp_def := proj2_sig wp_aux.
 Arguments wp {_ _} _ _ _.
 Instance: Params (@wp) 4.
 
-Notation "|| e @ E {{ Φ } }" := (wp E e Φ)
+Notation "#> e @ E {{ Φ } }" := (wp E e Φ)
   (at level 20, e, Φ at level 200,
-   format "||  e  @  E  {{  Φ  } }") : uPred_scope.
-Notation "|| e {{ Φ } }" := (wp ⊤ e Φ)
+   format "#>  e  @  E  {{  Φ  } }") : uPred_scope.
+Notation "#> e {{ Φ } }" := (wp ⊤ e Φ)
   (at level 20, e, Φ at level 200,
-   format "||  e   {{  Φ  } }") : uPred_scope.
+   format "#>  e   {{  Φ  } }") : uPred_scope.
 
 Section wp.
 Context {Λ : language} {Σ : rFunctor}.
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Proof.
   by intros Φ Φ' ?; apply equiv_dist=>n; apply wp_ne=>v; apply equiv_dist.
 Qed.
 Lemma wp_mask_frame_mono E1 E2 e Φ Ψ :
-  E1 ⊆ E2 → (∀ v, Φ v ⊑ Ψ v) → || e @ E1 {{ Φ }} ⊑ || e @ E2 {{ Ψ }}.
+  E1 ⊆ E2 → (∀ v, Φ v ⊑ Ψ v) → #> e @ E1 {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> e @ E2 {{ Ψ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite wp_eq. intros HE HΦ; split=> n r.
   revert e r; induction n as [n IH] using lt_wf_ind=> e r.
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ Proof.
   intros He; destruct 3; [by rewrite ?to_of_val in He|eauto].
 Qed.
 
-Lemma wp_value' E Φ v : Φ v ⊑ || of_val v @ E {{ Φ }}.
+Lemma wp_value' E Φ v : Φ v ⊑ #> of_val v @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. rewrite wp_eq. split=> n r; constructor; by apply pvs_intro. Qed.
-Lemma pvs_wp E e Φ : (|={E}=> || e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ || e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+Lemma pvs_wp E e Φ : (|={E}=> #> e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite wp_eq. split=> n r ? Hvs.
   destruct (to_val e) as [v|] eqn:He; [apply of_to_val in He; subst|].
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Proof.
   rewrite pvs_eq in Hvs. destruct (Hvs rf (S k) Ef σ1) as (r'&Hwp&?); auto.
   eapply wp_step_inv with (S k) r'; eauto.
 Qed.
-Lemma wp_pvs E e Φ : || e @  E {{ λ v, |={E}=> Φ v }} ⊑ || e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+Lemma wp_pvs E e Φ : #> e @  E {{ λ v, |={E}=> Φ v }} ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite wp_eq. split=> n r; revert e r;
     induction n as [n IH] using lt_wf_ind=> e r Hr HΦ.
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ Proof.
 Qed.
 Lemma wp_atomic E1 E2 e Φ :
   E2 ⊆ E1 → atomic e →
-  (|={E1,E2}=> || e @ E2 {{ λ v, |={E2,E1}=> Φ v }}) ⊑ || e @ E1 {{ Φ }}.
+  (|={E1,E2}=> #> e @ E2 {{ λ v, |={E2,E1}=> Φ v }}) ⊑ #> e @ E1 {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite wp_eq pvs_eq. intros ? He; split=> n r ? Hvs; constructor.
   eauto using atomic_not_val. intros rf k Ef σ1 ???.
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ Proof.
   - by rewrite -assoc.
   - constructor; apply pvs_intro; auto.
 Qed.
-Lemma wp_frame_r E e Φ R : (|| e @ E {{ Φ }} ★ R) ⊑ || e @ E {{ λ v, Φ v ★ R }}.
+Lemma wp_frame_r E e Φ R : (#> e @ E {{ Φ }} ★ R) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ λ v, Φ v ★ R }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite wp_eq. uPred.unseal; split; intros n r' Hvalid (r&rR&Hr&Hwp&?).
   revert Hvalid. rewrite Hr; clear Hr; revert e r Hwp.
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ Proof.
   - apply IH; eauto using uPred_weaken.
 Qed.
 Lemma wp_frame_later_r E e Φ R :
-  to_val e = None → (|| e @ E {{ Φ }} ★ ▷ R) ⊑ || e @ E {{ λ v, Φ v ★ R }}.
+  to_val e = None → (#> e @ E {{ Φ }} ★ ▷ R) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ λ v, Φ v ★ R }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite wp_eq. intros He; uPred.unseal; split; intros n r' Hvalid (r&rR&Hr&Hwp&?).
   revert Hvalid; rewrite Hr; clear Hr.
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ Proof.
     eapply uPred_weaken with n rR; eauto.
 Qed.
 Lemma wp_bind `{LanguageCtx Λ K} E e Φ :
-  || e @ E {{ λ v, || K (of_val v) @ E {{ Φ }} }} ⊑ || K e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  #> e @ E {{ λ v, #> K (of_val v) @ E {{ Φ }} }} ⊑ #> K e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite wp_eq. split=> n r; revert e r;
     induction n as [n IH] using lt_wf_ind=> e r ?.
@@ -218,44 +218,44 @@ Qed.
 
 (** * Derived rules *)
 Import uPred.
-Lemma wp_mono E e Φ Ψ : (∀ v, Φ v ⊑ Ψ v) → || e @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ || e @ E {{ Ψ }}.
+Lemma wp_mono E e Φ Ψ : (∀ v, Φ v ⊑ Ψ v) → #> e @ E {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Ψ }}.
 Proof. by apply wp_mask_frame_mono. Qed.
 Global Instance wp_mono' E e :
   Proper (pointwise_relation _ (⊑) ==> (⊑)) (@wp Λ Σ E e).
 Proof. by intros Φ Φ' ?; apply wp_mono. Qed.
 Lemma wp_strip_pvs E e P Φ :
-  P ⊑ || e @ E {{ Φ }} → (|={E}=> P) ⊑ || e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  P ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Φ }} → (|={E}=> P) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. move=>->. by rewrite pvs_wp. Qed.
-Lemma wp_value E Φ e v : to_val e = Some v → Φ v ⊑ || e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+Lemma wp_value E Φ e v : to_val e = Some v → Φ v ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. intros; rewrite -(of_to_val e v) //; by apply wp_value'. Qed.
 Lemma wp_value_pvs E Φ e v :
-  to_val e = Some v → (|={E}=> Φ v) ⊑ || e @ E {{ Φ }}.
+  to_val e = Some v → (|={E}=> Φ v) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. intros. rewrite -wp_pvs. rewrite -wp_value //. Qed.
-Lemma wp_frame_l E e Φ R : (R ★ || e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ || e @ E {{ λ v, R ★ Φ v }}.
+Lemma wp_frame_l E e Φ R : (R ★ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ λ v, R ★ Φ v }}.
 Proof. setoid_rewrite (comm _ R); apply wp_frame_r. Qed.
 Lemma wp_frame_later_l E e Φ R :
-  to_val e = None → (▷ R ★ || e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ || e @ E {{ λ v, R ★ Φ v }}.
+  to_val e = None → (▷ R ★ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ λ v, R ★ Φ v }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite (comm _ (▷ R)%I); setoid_rewrite (comm _ R).
   apply wp_frame_later_r.
 Qed.
 Lemma wp_always_l E e Φ R `{!AlwaysStable R} :
-  (R ∧ || e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ || e @ E {{ λ v, R ∧ Φ v }}.
+  (R ∧ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ λ v, R ∧ Φ v }}.
 Proof. by setoid_rewrite (always_and_sep_l _ _); rewrite wp_frame_l. Qed.
 Lemma wp_always_r E e Φ R `{!AlwaysStable R} :
-  (|| e @ E {{ Φ }} ∧ R) ⊑ || e @ E {{ λ v, Φ v ∧ R }}.
+  (#> e @ E {{ Φ }} ∧ R) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ λ v, Φ v ∧ R }}.
 Proof. by setoid_rewrite (always_and_sep_r _ _); rewrite wp_frame_r. Qed.
 Lemma wp_impl_l E e Φ Ψ :
-  ((□ ∀ v, Φ v → Ψ v) ∧ || e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ || e @ E {{ Ψ }}.
+  ((□ ∀ v, Φ v → Ψ v) ∧ #> e @ E {{ Φ }}) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Ψ }}.
 Proof.
   rewrite wp_always_l; apply wp_mono=> // v.
   by rewrite always_elim (forall_elim v) impl_elim_l.
 Qed.
 Lemma wp_impl_r E e Φ Ψ :
-  (|| e @ E {{ Φ }} ∧ □ (∀ v, Φ v → Ψ v)) ⊑ || e @ E {{ Ψ }}.
+  (#> e @ E {{ Φ }} ∧ □ (∀ v, Φ v → Ψ v)) ⊑ #> e @ E {{ Ψ }}.
 Proof. by rewrite comm wp_impl_l. Qed.
 Lemma wp_mask_weaken E1 E2 e Φ :
-  E1 ⊆ E2 → || e @ E1 {{ Φ }} ⊑ || e @ E2 {{ Φ }}.
+  E1 ⊆ E2 → #> e @ E1 {{ Φ }} ⊑ #> e @ E2 {{ Φ }}.
 Proof. auto using wp_mask_frame_mono. Qed.
 
 (** * Weakest-pre is a FSA. *)