fin_maps.v 70.7 KB
Newer Older
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1
2
3
4
5
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2015, Robbert Krebbers. *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** Finite maps associate data to keys. This file defines an interface for
finite maps and collects some theory on it. Most importantly, it proves useful
induction principles for finite maps and implements the tactic
6
[simplify_map_eq] to simplify goals involving finite maps. *)
7
From Coq Require Import Permutation.
8
From iris.prelude Require Export relations vector orders.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41

(** * Axiomatization of finite maps *)
(** We require Leibniz equality to be extensional on finite maps. This of
course limits the space of finite map implementations, but since we are mainly
interested in finite maps with numbers as indexes, we do not consider this to
be a serious limitation. The main application of finite maps is to implement
the memory, where extensionality of Leibniz equality is very important for a
convenient use in the assertions of our axiomatic semantics. *)

(** Finiteness is axiomatized by requiring that each map can be translated
to an association list. The translation to association lists is used to
prove well founded recursion on finite maps. *)

(** Finite map implementations are required to implement the [merge] function
which enables us to give a generic implementation of [union_with],
[intersection_with], and [difference_with]. *)

Class FinMapToList K A M := map_to_list: M  list (K * A).

Class FinMap K M `{FMap M,  A, Lookup K A (M A),  A, Empty (M A),  A,
    PartialAlter K A (M A), OMap M, Merge M,  A, FinMapToList K A (M A),
     i j : K, Decision (i = j)} := {
  map_eq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : ( i, m1 !! i = m2 !! i)  m1 = m2;
  lookup_empty {A} i : ( : M A) !! i = None;
  lookup_partial_alter {A} f (m : M A) i :
    partial_alter f i m !! i = f (m !! i);
  lookup_partial_alter_ne {A} f (m : M A) i j :
    i  j  partial_alter f i m !! j = m !! j;
  lookup_fmap {A B} (f : A  B) (m : M A) i : (f <$> m) !! i = f <$> m !! i;
  NoDup_map_to_list {A} (m : M A) : NoDup (map_to_list m);
  elem_of_map_to_list {A} (m : M A) i x :
    (i,x)  map_to_list m  m !! i = Some x;
  lookup_omap {A B} (f : A  option B) m i : omap f m !! i = m !! i = f;
42
  lookup_merge {A B C} (f: option A  option B  option C) `{!DiagNone f} m1 m2 i :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
    merge f m1 m2 !! i = f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)
}.

(** * Derived operations *)
(** All of the following functions are defined in a generic way for arbitrary
finite map implementations. These generic implementations do not cause a
significant performance loss to make including them in the finite map interface
worthwhile. *)
Instance map_insert `{PartialAlter K A M} : Insert K A M :=
  λ i x, partial_alter (λ _, Some x) i.
Instance map_alter `{PartialAlter K A M} : Alter K A M :=
  λ f, partial_alter (fmap f).
Instance map_delete `{PartialAlter K A M} : Delete K M :=
  partial_alter (λ _, None).
Instance map_singleton `{PartialAlter K A M, Empty M} :
58
  SingletonM K A M := λ i x, <[i:=x]> .
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72

Definition map_of_list `{Insert K A M, Empty M} : list (K * A)  M :=
  fold_right (λ p, <[p.1:=p.2]>) .
Definition map_of_collection `{Elements K C, Insert K A M, Empty M}
    (f : K  option A) (X : C) : M :=
  map_of_list (omap (λ i, (i,) <$> f i) (elements X)).

Instance map_union_with `{Merge M} {A} : UnionWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (union_with f).
Instance map_intersection_with `{Merge M} {A} : IntersectionWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (intersection_with f).
Instance map_difference_with `{Merge M} {A} : DifferenceWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (difference_with f).

73
74
Instance map_equiv `{ A, Lookup K A (M A), Equiv A} : Equiv (M A) | 18 :=
  λ m1 m2,  i, m1 !! i  m2 !! i.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118

(** The relation [intersection_forall R] on finite maps describes that the
relation [R] holds for each pair in the intersection. *)
Definition map_Forall `{Lookup K A M} (P : K  A  Prop) : M  Prop :=
  λ m,  i x, m !! i = Some x  P i x.
Definition map_relation `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A B} (R : A  B  Prop)
    (P : A  Prop) (Q : B  Prop) (m1 : M A) (m2 : M B) : Prop :=  i,
  option_relation R P Q (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i).
Definition map_included `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A}
  (R : relation A) : relation (M A) := map_relation R (λ _, False) (λ _, True).
Definition map_disjoint `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A} : relation (M A) :=
  map_relation (λ _ _, False) (λ _, True) (λ _, True).
Infix "⊥ₘ" := map_disjoint (at level 70) : C_scope.
Hint Extern 0 (_ ⊥ₘ _) => symmetry; eassumption.
Notation "( m ⊥ₘ.)" := (map_disjoint m) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(.⊥ₘ m )" := (λ m2, m2 ⊥ₘ m) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Instance map_subseteq `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A} : SubsetEq (M A) :=
  map_included (=).

(** The union of two finite maps only has a meaningful definition for maps
that are disjoint. However, as working with partial functions is inconvenient
in Coq, we define the union as a total function. In case both finite maps
have a value at the same index, we take the value of the first map. *)
Instance map_union `{Merge M} {A} : Union (M A) := union_with (λ x _, Some x).
Instance map_intersection `{Merge M} {A} : Intersection (M A) :=
  intersection_with (λ x _, Some x).

(** The difference operation removes all values from the first map whose
index contains a value in the second map as well. *)
Instance map_difference `{Merge M} {A} : Difference (M A) :=
  difference_with (λ _ _, None).

(** A stronger variant of map that allows the mapped function to use the index
of the elements. Implemented by conversion to lists, so not very efficient. *)
Definition map_imap `{ A, Insert K A (M A),  A, Empty (M A),
     A, FinMapToList K A (M A)} {A B} (f : K  A  option B) (m : M A) : M B :=
  map_of_list (omap (λ ix, (fst ix,) <$> curry f ix) (map_to_list m)).

(** * Theorems *)
Section theorems.
Context `{FinMap K M}.

(** ** Setoids *)
Section setoid.
119
120
  Context `{Equiv A} `{!Equivalence (() : relation A)}.
  Global Instance map_equivalence : Equivalence (() : relation (M A)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
122
  Proof.
    split.
123
124
    - by intros m i.
    - by intros m1 m2 ? i.
125
    - by intros m1 m2 m3 ?? i; trans (m2 !! i).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126
127
128
129
130
  Qed.
  Global Instance lookup_proper (i : K) :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (lookup (M:=M A) i).
  Proof. by intros m1 m2 Hm. Qed.
  Global Instance partial_alter_proper :
131
    Proper ((() ==> ()) ==> (=) ==> () ==> ()) (partial_alter (M:=M A)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
  Proof.
    by intros f1 f2 Hf i ? <- m1 m2 Hm j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
      rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne by done;
      try apply Hf; apply lookup_proper.
  Qed.
  Global Instance insert_proper (i : K) :
    Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (insert (M:=M A) i).
  Proof. by intros ???; apply partial_alter_proper; [constructor|]. Qed.
140
141
142
  Global Instance singleton_proper k :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (singletonM k : A  M A).
  Proof. by intros ???; apply insert_proper. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
  Global Instance delete_proper (i : K) :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (delete (M:=M A) i).
  Proof. by apply partial_alter_proper; [constructor|]. Qed.
  Global Instance alter_proper :
    Proper ((() ==> ()) ==> (=) ==> () ==> ()) (alter (A:=A) (M:=M A)).
  Proof.
    intros ?? Hf; apply partial_alter_proper.
    by destruct 1; constructor; apply Hf.
  Qed.
152
  Lemma merge_ext f g `{!DiagNone f, !DiagNone g} :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
153
    (() ==> () ==> ())%signature f g 
154
    (() ==> () ==> ())%signature (merge (M:=M) f) (merge g).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
155
156
157
158
  Proof.
    by intros Hf ?? Hm1 ?? Hm2 i; rewrite !lookup_merge by done; apply Hf.
  Qed.
  Global Instance union_with_proper :
159
    Proper ((() ==> () ==> ()) ==> () ==> () ==>()) (union_with (M:=M A)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
160
161
162
  Proof.
    intros ?? Hf ?? Hm1 ?? Hm2 i; apply (merge_ext _ _); auto.
    by do 2 destruct 1; first [apply Hf | constructor].
163
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
164
165
  Global Instance map_leibniz `{!LeibnizEquiv A} : LeibnizEquiv (M A).
  Proof.
166
167
    intros m1 m2 Hm; apply map_eq; intros i.
    by unfold_leibniz; apply lookup_proper.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
168
  Qed.
169
170
171
172
173
  Lemma map_equiv_empty (m : M A) : m    m = .
  Proof.
    split; [intros Hm; apply map_eq; intros i|by intros ->].
    by rewrite lookup_empty, <-equiv_None, Hm, lookup_empty.
  Qed.
174
  Lemma map_equiv_lookup_l (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
175
    m1  m2  m1 !! i = Some x   y, m2 !! i = Some y  x  y.
176
  Proof. generalize (equiv_Some_inv_l (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i) x); naive_solver. Qed.
177
178
179
180
181
  Global Instance map_fmap_proper `{Equiv B} (f : A  B) :
    Proper (() ==> ()) f  Proper (() ==> ()) (fmap (M:=M) f).
  Proof.
    intros ? m m' ? k; rewrite !lookup_fmap. by apply option_fmap_proper.
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
End setoid.

(** ** General properties *)
Lemma map_eq_iff {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1 = m2   i, m1 !! i = m2 !! i.
Proof. split. by intros ->. apply map_eq. Qed.
Lemma map_subseteq_spec {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2   i x, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  unfold subseteq, map_subseteq, map_relation. split; intros Hm i;
    specialize (Hm i); destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); naive_solver.
Qed.
Global Instance: EmptySpec (M A).
Proof.
  intros A m. rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros i x. by rewrite lookup_empty.
Qed.
Global Instance:  {A} (R : relation A), PreOrder R  PreOrder (map_included R).
Proof.
  split; [intros m i; by destruct (m !! i); simpl|].
  intros m1 m2 m3 Hm12 Hm23 i; specialize (Hm12 i); specialize (Hm23 i).
202
  destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i), (m3 !! i); simplify_eq/=;
203
    done || etrans; eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
Qed.
Global Instance: PartialOrder (() : relation (M A)).
Proof.
  split; [apply _|].
  intros m1 m2; rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros i; apply option_eq; naive_solver.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = Some x  m1  m2  m2 !! i = Some x.
Proof. rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. auto. Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken_is_Some {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  is_Some (m1 !! i)  m1  m2  is_Some (m2 !! i).
Proof. inversion 1. eauto using lookup_weaken. Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken_None {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  m2 !! i = None  m1  m2  m1 !! i = None.
Proof.
  rewrite map_subseteq_spec, !eq_None_not_Some.
  intros Hm2 Hm [??]; destruct Hm2; eauto.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken_inv {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x y :
  m1 !! i = Some x  m1  m2  m2 !! i = Some y  x = y.
Proof. intros Hm1 ? Hm2. eapply lookup_weaken in Hm1; eauto. congruence. Qed.
Lemma lookup_ne {A} (m : M A) i j : m !! i  m !! j  i  j.
Proof. congruence. Qed.
Lemma map_empty {A} (m : M A) : ( i, m !! i = None)  m = .
Proof. intros Hm. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite Hm, lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma lookup_empty_is_Some {A} i : ¬is_Some (( : M A) !! i).
Proof. rewrite lookup_empty. by inversion 1. Qed.
Lemma lookup_empty_Some {A} i (x : A) : ¬∅ !! i = Some x.
Proof. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma map_subset_empty {A} (m : M A) : m  .
Proof.
  intros [_ []]. rewrite map_subseteq_spec. intros ??. by rewrite lookup_empty.
Qed.
238
239
Lemma map_fmap_empty {A B} (f : A  B) : f <$> ( : M A) = .
Proof. by apply map_eq; intros i; rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_empty. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261

(** ** Properties of the [partial_alter] operation *)
Lemma partial_alter_ext {A} (f g : option A  option A) (m : M A) i :
  ( x, m !! i = x  f x = g x)  partial_alter f i m = partial_alter g i m.
Proof.
  intros. apply map_eq; intros j. by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne; auto.
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_compose {A} f g (m : M A) i:
  partial_alter (f  g) i m = partial_alter f i (partial_alter g i m).
Proof.
  intros. apply map_eq. intros ii. by destruct (decide (i = ii)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne.
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_commute {A} f g (m : M A) i j :
  i  j  partial_alter f i (partial_alter g j m) =
    partial_alter g j (partial_alter f i m).
Proof.
  intros. apply map_eq; intros jj. destruct (decide (jj = j)) as [->|?].
  { by rewrite lookup_partial_alter_ne,
      !lookup_partial_alter, lookup_partial_alter_ne. }
  destruct (decide (jj = i)) as [->|?].
262
  - by rewrite lookup_partial_alter,
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
263
     !lookup_partial_alter_ne, lookup_partial_alter by congruence.
264
  - by rewrite !lookup_partial_alter_ne by congruence.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_self_alt {A} (m : M A) i x :
  x = m !! i  partial_alter (λ _, x) i m = m.
Proof.
  intros. apply map_eq. intros ii. by destruct (decide (i = ii)) as [->|];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne.
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_self {A} (m : M A) i : partial_alter (λ _, m !! i) i m = m.
Proof. by apply partial_alter_self_alt. Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_subseteq {A} f (m : M A) i :
  m !! i = None  m  partial_alter f i m.
Proof.
  rewrite map_subseteq_spec. intros Hi j x Hj.
  rewrite lookup_partial_alter_ne; congruence.
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_subset {A} f (m : M A) i :
  m !! i = None  is_Some (f (m !! i))  m  partial_alter f i m.
Proof.
  intros Hi Hfi. split; [by apply partial_alter_subseteq|].
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. inversion Hfi as [x Hx]. intros Hm.
  apply (Some_ne_None x). rewrite <-(Hm i x); [done|].
  by rewrite lookup_partial_alter.
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [alter] operation *)
Lemma alter_ext {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i :
  ( x, m !! i = Some x  f x = g x)  alter f i m = alter g i m.
292
Proof. intro. apply partial_alter_ext. intros [x|] ?; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
Lemma lookup_alter {A} (f : A  A) m i : alter f i m !! i = f <$> m !! i.
Proof. unfold alter. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
Lemma lookup_alter_ne {A} (f : A  A) m i j : i  j  alter f i m !! j = m !! j.
Proof. unfold alter. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
Lemma alter_compose {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i:
  alter (f  g) i m = alter f i (alter g i m).
Proof.
  unfold alter, map_alter. rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
  apply partial_alter_ext. by intros [?|].
Qed.
Lemma alter_commute {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i j :
  i  j  alter f i (alter g j m) = alter g j (alter f i m).
Proof. apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
Lemma lookup_alter_Some {A} (f : A  A) m i j y :
  alter f i m !! j = Some y 
    (i = j   x, m !! j = Some x  y = f x)  (i  j  m !! j = Some y).
Proof.
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
311
  - rewrite lookup_alter. naive_solver (simplify_option_eq; eauto).
312
  - rewrite lookup_alter_ne by done. naive_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
Qed.
Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A  A) m i j :
  alter f i m !! j = None  m !! j = None.
Proof.
  by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_alter, ?fmap_None, ?lookup_alter_ne.
Qed.
Lemma alter_id {A} (f : A  A) m i :
  ( x, m !! i = Some x  f x = x)  alter f i m = m.
Proof.
  intros Hi; apply map_eq; intros j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
324
  { rewrite lookup_alter; destruct (m !! j); f_equal/=; auto. }
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
  by rewrite lookup_alter_ne by done.
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [delete] operation *)
Lemma lookup_delete {A} (m : M A) i : delete i m !! i = None.
Proof. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
Lemma lookup_delete_ne {A} (m : M A) i j : i  j  delete i m !! j = m !! j.
Proof. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
Lemma lookup_delete_Some {A} (m : M A) i j y :
  delete i m !! j = Some y  i  j  m !! j = Some y.
Proof.
  split.
337
  - destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
338
      rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne; intuition congruence.
339
  - intros [??]. by rewrite lookup_delete_ne.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
340
Qed.
341
342
343
Lemma lookup_delete_is_Some {A} (m : M A) i j :
  is_Some (delete i m !! j)  i  j  is_Some (m !! j).
Proof. unfold is_Some; setoid_rewrite lookup_delete_Some; naive_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
Lemma lookup_delete_None {A} (m : M A) i j :
  delete i m !! j = None  i = j  m !! j = None.
Proof.
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne; tauto.
Qed.
Lemma delete_empty {A} i : delete i ( : M A) = .
Proof. rewrite <-(partial_alter_self ) at 2. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
352
Lemma delete_singleton {A} i (x : A) : delete i {[i := x]} = .
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
Proof. setoid_rewrite <-partial_alter_compose. apply delete_empty. Qed.
Lemma delete_commute {A} (m : M A) i j :
  delete i (delete j m) = delete j (delete i m).
Proof. destruct (decide (i = j)). by subst. by apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
Lemma delete_insert_ne {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  i  j  delete i (<[j:=x]>m) = <[j:=x]>(delete i m).
Proof. intro. by apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
Lemma delete_notin {A} (m : M A) i : m !! i = None  delete i m = m.
Proof.
  intros. apply map_eq. intros j. by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne.
Qed.
Lemma delete_partial_alter {A} (m : M A) i f :
  m !! i = None  delete i (partial_alter f i m) = m.
Proof.
  intros. unfold delete, map_delete. rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
  unfold compose. by apply partial_alter_self_alt.
Qed.
Lemma delete_insert {A} (m : M A) i x :
  m !! i = None  delete i (<[i:=x]>m) = m.
Proof. apply delete_partial_alter. Qed.
374
375
Lemma insert_delete {A} (m : M A) i x : <[i:=x]>(delete i m) = <[i:=x]> m.
Proof. symmetry; apply (partial_alter_compose (λ _, Some x)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
Lemma delete_subseteq {A} (m : M A) i : delete i m  m.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros j x. rewrite lookup_delete_Some. tauto.
Qed.
Lemma delete_subseteq_compat {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  m1  m2  delete i m1  delete i m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros ? j x.
  rewrite !lookup_delete_Some. intuition eauto.
Qed.
Lemma delete_subset_alt {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = Some x  delete i m  m.
Proof.
  split; [apply delete_subseteq|].
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros Hi. apply (None_ne_Some x).
  by rewrite <-(lookup_delete m i), (Hi i x).
Qed.
Lemma delete_subset {A} (m : M A) i : is_Some (m !! i)  delete i m  m.
Proof. inversion 1. eauto using delete_subset_alt. Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [insert] operation *)
Lemma lookup_insert {A} (m : M A) i x : <[i:=x]>m !! i = Some x.
Proof. unfold insert. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
Lemma lookup_insert_rev {A}  (m : M A) i x y : <[i:=x]>m !! i = Some y  x = y.
Proof. rewrite lookup_insert. congruence. Qed.
Lemma lookup_insert_ne {A} (m : M A) i j x : i  j  <[i:=x]>m !! j = m !! j.
Proof. unfold insert. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
402
403
Lemma insert_insert {A} (m : M A) i x y : <[i:=x]>(<[i:=y]>m) = <[i:=x]>m.
Proof. unfold insert, map_insert. by rewrite <-partial_alter_compose. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
Lemma insert_commute {A} (m : M A) i j x y :
  i  j  <[i:=x]>(<[j:=y]>m) = <[j:=y]>(<[i:=x]>m).
Proof. apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
Lemma lookup_insert_Some {A} (m : M A) i j x y :
  <[i:=x]>m !! j = Some y  (i = j  x = y)  (i  j  m !! j = Some y).
Proof.
  split.
411
  - destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
      rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne; intuition congruence.
413
  - intros [[-> ->]|[??]]; [apply lookup_insert|]. by rewrite lookup_insert_ne.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
414
Qed.
415
416
417
Lemma lookup_insert_is_Some {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  is_Some (<[i:=x]>m !! j)  i = j  i  j  is_Some (m !! j).
Proof. unfold is_Some; setoid_rewrite lookup_insert_Some; naive_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
Lemma lookup_insert_None {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  <[i:=x]>m !! j = None  m !! j = None  i  j.
Proof.
  split; [|by intros [??]; rewrite lookup_insert_ne].
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne; intuition congruence.
Qed.
Lemma insert_id {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = Some x  <[i:=x]>m = m.
Proof.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    by rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne by done.
Qed.
Lemma insert_included {A} R `{!Reflexive R} (m : M A) i x :
  ( y, m !! i = Some y  R y x)  map_included R m (<[i:=x]>m).
Proof.
  intros ? j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|].
434
435
  - rewrite lookup_insert. destruct (m !! j); simpl; eauto.
  - rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done. by destruct (m !! j); simpl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
Qed.
Lemma insert_subseteq {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = None  m  <[i:=x]>m.
Proof. apply partial_alter_subseteq. Qed.
Lemma insert_subset {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = None  m  <[i:=x]>m.
Proof. intro. apply partial_alter_subset; eauto. Qed.
Lemma insert_subseteq_r {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = None  m1  m2  m1  <[i:=x]>m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros ?? j ?.
  destruct (decide (j = i)) as [->|?]; [congruence|].
  rewrite lookup_insert_ne; auto.
Qed.
Lemma insert_delete_subseteq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2  m1  delete i m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros Hi Hix j y Hj.
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|]; [congruence|].
  rewrite lookup_delete_ne by done.
  apply Hix; by rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done.
Qed.
Lemma delete_insert_subseteq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = Some x  delete i m1  m2  m1  <[i:=x]> m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros Hix Hi j y Hj. destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
461
462
  - rewrite lookup_insert. congruence.
  - rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done. apply Hi. by rewrite lookup_delete_ne.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
Qed.
Lemma insert_delete_subset {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2  m1  delete i m2.
Proof.
  intros ? [Hm12 Hm21]; split; [eauto using insert_delete_subseteq|].
  contradict Hm21. apply delete_insert_subseteq; auto.
  eapply lookup_weaken, Hm12. by rewrite lookup_insert.
Qed.
Lemma insert_subset_inv {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2 
   m2', m2 = <[i:=x]>m2'  m1  m2'  m2' !! i = None.
Proof.
475
  intros Hi Hm1m2. exists (delete i m2). split_and?.
476
477
  - rewrite insert_delete, insert_id. done.
    eapply lookup_weaken, strict_include; eauto. by rewrite lookup_insert.
478
479
  - eauto using insert_delete_subset.
  - by rewrite lookup_delete.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
480
Qed.
481
Lemma insert_empty {A} i (x : A) : <[i:=x]> = {[i := x]}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
482
483
484
485
Proof. done. Qed.

(** ** Properties of the singleton maps *)
Lemma lookup_singleton_Some {A} i j (x y : A) :
486
  {[i := x]} !! j = Some y  i = j  x = y.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
487
Proof.
488
  rewrite <-insert_empty,lookup_insert_Some, lookup_empty; intuition congruence.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
489
Qed.
490
Lemma lookup_singleton_None {A} i j (x : A) : {[i := x]} !! j = None  i  j.
491
Proof. rewrite <-insert_empty,lookup_insert_None, lookup_empty; tauto. Qed.
492
Lemma lookup_singleton {A} i (x : A) : {[i := x]} !! i = Some x.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
493
Proof. by rewrite lookup_singleton_Some. Qed.
494
Lemma lookup_singleton_ne {A} i j (x : A) : i  j  {[i := x]} !! j = None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
495
Proof. by rewrite lookup_singleton_None. Qed.
496
Lemma map_non_empty_singleton {A} i (x : A) : {[i := x]}  .
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
497
498
499
500
Proof.
  intros Hix. apply (f_equal (!! i)) in Hix.
  by rewrite lookup_empty, lookup_singleton in Hix.
Qed.
501
Lemma insert_singleton {A} i (x y : A) : <[i:=y]>{[i := x]} = {[i := y]}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
502
Proof.
503
  unfold singletonM, map_singleton, insert, map_insert.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
504
505
  by rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
Qed.
506
Lemma alter_singleton {A} (f : A  A) i x : alter f i {[i := x]} = {[i := f x]}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
507
508
Proof.
  intros. apply map_eq. intros i'. destruct (decide (i = i')) as [->|?].
509
510
  - by rewrite lookup_alter, !lookup_singleton.
  - by rewrite lookup_alter_ne, !lookup_singleton_ne.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
511
512
Qed.
Lemma alter_singleton_ne {A} (f : A  A) i j x :
513
  i  j  alter f i {[j := x]} = {[j := x]}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
Proof.
  intros. apply map_eq; intros i'. by destruct (decide (i = i')) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_alter, ?lookup_singleton_ne, ?lookup_alter_ne by done.
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the map operations *)
Lemma fmap_empty {A B} (f : A  B) : f <$>  = .
Proof. apply map_empty; intros i. by rewrite lookup_fmap, lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma omap_empty {A B} (f : A  option B) : omap f  = .
Proof. apply map_empty; intros i. by rewrite lookup_omap, lookup_empty. Qed.
524
525
526
Lemma fmap_insert {A B} (f: A  B) m i x: f <$> <[i:=x]>m = <[i:=f x]>(f <$> m).
Proof.
  apply map_eq; intros i'; destruct (decide (i' = i)) as [->|].
527
528
  - by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_insert.
  - by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_insert_ne, lookup_fmap by done.
529
Qed.
530
531
532
533
534
535
Lemma fmap_delete {A B} (f: A  B) m i: f <$> delete i m = delete i (f <$> m).
Proof.
  apply map_eq; intros i'; destruct (decide (i' = i)) as [->|].
  - by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_delete.
  - by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_delete_ne, lookup_fmap by done.
Qed.
536
537
538
539
Lemma omap_insert {A B} (f : A  option B) m i x y :
  f x = Some y  omap f (<[i:=x]>m) = <[i:=y]>(omap f m).
Proof.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros i'; destruct (decide (i' = i)) as [->|].
540
541
  - by rewrite lookup_omap, !lookup_insert.
  - by rewrite lookup_omap, !lookup_insert_ne, lookup_omap by done.
542
Qed.
543
Lemma map_fmap_singleton {A B} (f : A  B) i x : f <$> {[i := x]} = {[i := f x]}.
544
545
546
Proof.
  by unfold singletonM, map_singleton; rewrite fmap_insert, map_fmap_empty.
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
547
Lemma omap_singleton {A B} (f : A  option B) i x y :
548
  f x = Some y  omap f {[ i := x ]} = {[ i := y ]}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
549
Proof.
550
551
  intros. unfold singletonM, map_singleton.
  by erewrite omap_insert, omap_empty by eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
552
553
554
555
556
557
Qed.
Lemma map_fmap_id {A} (m : M A) : id <$> m = m.
Proof. apply map_eq; intros i; by rewrite lookup_fmap, option_fmap_id. Qed.
Lemma map_fmap_compose {A B C} (f : A  B) (g : B  C) (m : M A) :
  g  f <$> m = g <$> f <$> m.
Proof. apply map_eq; intros i; by rewrite !lookup_fmap,option_fmap_compose. Qed.
558
559
560
561
562
563
Lemma map_fmap_setoid_ext `{Equiv A, Equiv B} (f1 f2 : A  B) m :
  ( i x, m !! i = Some x  f1 x  f2 x)  f1 <$> m  f2 <$> m.
Proof.
  intros Hi i; rewrite !lookup_fmap.
  destruct (m !! i) eqn:?; constructor; eauto.
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
564
565
566
567
568
569
Lemma map_fmap_ext {A B} (f1 f2 : A  B) m :
  ( i x, m !! i = Some x  f1 x = f2 x)  f1 <$> m = f2 <$> m.
Proof.
  intros Hi; apply map_eq; intros i; rewrite !lookup_fmap.
  by destruct (m !! i) eqn:?; simpl; erewrite ?Hi by eauto.
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
570
571
572
573
574
575
Lemma omap_ext {A B} (f1 f2 : A  option B) m :
  ( i x, m !! i = Some x  f1 x = f2 x)  omap f1 m = omap f2 m.
Proof.
  intros Hi; apply map_eq; intros i; rewrite !lookup_omap.
  by destruct (m !! i) eqn:?; simpl; erewrite ?Hi by eauto.
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587

(** ** Properties of conversion to lists *)
Lemma map_to_list_unique {A} (m : M A) i x y :
  (i,x)  map_to_list m  (i,y)  map_to_list m  x = y.
Proof. rewrite !elem_of_map_to_list. congruence. Qed.
Lemma NoDup_fst_map_to_list {A} (m : M A) : NoDup ((map_to_list m).*1).
Proof. eauto using NoDup_fmap_fst, map_to_list_unique, NoDup_map_to_list. Qed.
Lemma elem_of_map_of_list_1_help {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
  (i,x)  l  ( y, (i,y)  l  y = x)  map_of_list l !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  induction l as [|[j y] l IH]; csimpl; [by rewrite elem_of_nil|].
  setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons.
588
  intros [?|?] Hdup; simplify_eq; [by rewrite lookup_insert|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
589
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|].
590
591
  - rewrite lookup_insert; f_equal; eauto.
  - rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done; eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_map_of_list_1 {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
  NoDup (l.*1)  (i,x)  l  map_of_list l !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  intros ? Hx; apply elem_of_map_of_list_1_help; eauto using NoDup_fmap_fst.
  intros y; revert Hx. rewrite !elem_of_list_lookup; intros [i' Hi'] [j' Hj'].
  cut (i' = j'); [naive_solver|]. apply NoDup_lookup with (l.*1) i;
    by rewrite ?list_lookup_fmap, ?Hi', ?Hj'.
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_map_of_list_2 {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
  map_of_list l !! i = Some x  (i,x)  l.
Proof.
  induction l as [|[j y] l IH]; simpl; [by rewrite lookup_empty|].
  rewrite elem_of_cons. destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne; intuition congruence.
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_map_of_list {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
  NoDup (l.*1)  (i,x)  l  map_of_list l !! i = Some x.
Proof. split; auto using elem_of_map_of_list_1, elem_of_map_of_list_2. Qed.
Lemma not_elem_of_map_of_list_1 {A} (l : list (K * A)) i :
  i  l.*1  map_of_list l !! i = None.
Proof.
  rewrite elem_of_list_fmap, eq_None_not_Some. intros Hi [x ?]; destruct Hi.
  exists (i,x); simpl; auto using elem_of_map_of_list_2.
Qed.
Lemma not_elem_of_map_of_list_2 {A} (l : list (K * A)) i :
  map_of_list l !! i = None  i  l.*1.
Proof.
  induction l as [|[j y] l IH]; csimpl; [rewrite elem_of_nil; tauto|].
621
  rewrite elem_of_cons. destruct (decide (i = j)); simplify_eq.
622
623
  - by rewrite lookup_insert.
  - by rewrite lookup_insert_ne; intuition.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
Qed.
Lemma not_elem_of_map_of_list {A} (l : list (K * A)) i :
  i  l.*1  map_of_list l !! i = None.
Proof. red; auto using not_elem_of_map_of_list_1,not_elem_of_map_of_list_2. Qed.
Lemma map_of_list_proper {A} (l1 l2 : list (K * A)) :
  NoDup (l1.*1)  l1 ≡ₚ l2  map_of_list l1 = map_of_list l2.
Proof.
  intros ? Hperm. apply map_eq. intros i. apply option_eq. intros x.
  by rewrite <-!elem_of_map_of_list; rewrite <-?Hperm.
Qed.
Lemma map_of_list_inj {A} (l1 l2 : list (K * A)) :
  NoDup (l1.*1)  NoDup (l2.*1)  map_of_list l1 = map_of_list l2  l1 ≡ₚ l2.
Proof.
  intros ?? Hl1l2. apply NoDup_Permutation; auto using (NoDup_fmap_1 fst).
  intros [i x]. by rewrite !elem_of_map_of_list, Hl1l2.
Qed.
Lemma map_of_to_list {A} (m : M A) : map_of_list (map_to_list m) = m.
Proof.
  apply map_eq. intros i. apply option_eq. intros x.
  by rewrite <-elem_of_map_of_list, elem_of_map_to_list
    by auto using NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
Qed.
Lemma map_to_of_list {A} (l : list (K * A)) :
  NoDup (l.*1)  map_to_list (map_of_list l) ≡ₚ l.
Proof. auto using map_of_list_inj, NoDup_fst_map_to_list, map_of_to_list. Qed.
Lemma map_to_list_inj {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  map_to_list m1 ≡ₚ map_to_list m2  m1 = m2.
Proof.
  intros. rewrite <-(map_of_to_list m1), <-(map_of_to_list m2).
  auto using map_of_list_proper, NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
Qed.
Lemma map_to_of_list_flip {A} (m1 : M A) l2 :
  map_to_list m1 ≡ₚ l2  m1 = map_of_list l2.
Proof.
  intros. rewrite <-(map_of_to_list m1).
  auto using map_of_list_proper, NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
Qed.
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673

Lemma map_of_list_nil {A} : map_of_list (@nil (K * A)) = .
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma map_of_list_cons {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
  map_of_list ((i, x) :: l) = <[i:=x]>(map_of_list l).
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma map_of_list_fmap {A B} (f : A  B) l :
  map_of_list (prod_map id f <$> l) = f <$> map_of_list l.
Proof.
  induction l as [|[i x] l IH]; csimpl; rewrite ?fmap_empty; auto.
  rewrite <-map_of_list_cons; simpl. by rewrite IH, <-fmap_insert.
Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
Lemma map_to_list_empty {A} : map_to_list  = @nil (K * A).
Proof.
  apply elem_of_nil_inv. intros [i x].
  rewrite elem_of_map_to_list. apply lookup_empty_Some.
Qed.
Lemma map_to_list_insert {A} (m : M A) i x :
  m !! i = None  map_to_list (<[i:=x]>m) ≡ₚ (i,x) :: map_to_list m.
Proof.
  intros. apply map_of_list_inj; csimpl.
683
684
  - apply NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
  - constructor; auto using NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
685
686
    rewrite elem_of_list_fmap. intros [[??] [? Hlookup]]; subst; simpl in *.
    rewrite elem_of_map_to_list in Hlookup. congruence.
687
  - by rewrite !map_of_to_list.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
688
Qed.
689
690
691
692
693
694
Lemma map_to_list_contains {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2  map_to_list m1 `contains` map_to_list m2.
Proof.
  intros; apply NoDup_contains; auto using NoDup_map_to_list.
  intros [i x]. rewrite !elem_of_map_to_list; eauto using lookup_weaken.
Qed.
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
Lemma map_to_list_fmap {A B} (f : A  B) m :
  map_to_list (f <$> m) ≡ₚ prod_map id f <$> map_to_list m.
Proof.
  assert (NoDup ((prod_map id f <$> map_to_list m).*1)).
  { erewrite <-list_fmap_compose, (list_fmap_ext _ fst) by done.
    apply NoDup_fst_map_to_list. }
  rewrite <-(map_of_to_list m) at 1.
  by rewrite <-map_of_list_fmap, map_to_of_list.
Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
Lemma map_to_list_empty_inv_alt {A}  (m : M A) : map_to_list m ≡ₚ []  m = .
Proof. rewrite <-map_to_list_empty. apply map_to_list_inj. Qed.
Lemma map_to_list_empty_inv {A} (m : M A) : map_to_list m = []  m = .
Proof. intros Hm. apply map_to_list_empty_inv_alt. by rewrite Hm. Qed.
Lemma map_to_list_insert_inv {A} (m : M A) l i x :
  map_to_list m ≡ₚ (i,x) :: l  m = <[i:=x]>(map_of_list l).
Proof.
  intros Hperm. apply map_to_list_inj.
  assert (i  l.*1  NoDup (l.*1)) as [].
  { rewrite <-NoDup_cons. change (NoDup (((i,x)::l).*1)). rewrite <-Hperm.
    auto using NoDup_fst_map_to_list. }
  rewrite Hperm, map_to_list_insert, map_to_of_list;
    auto using not_elem_of_map_of_list_1.
Qed.
719

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
720
721
722
723
Lemma map_choose {A} (m : M A) : m     i x, m !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  intros Hemp. destruct (map_to_list m) as [|[i x] l] eqn:Hm.
  { destruct Hemp; eauto using map_to_list_empty_inv. }
724
  exists i, x. rewrite <-elem_of_map_to_list, Hm. by left.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
Qed.

(** Properties of the imap function *)
Lemma lookup_imap {A B} (f : K  A  option B) m i :
  map_imap f m !! i = m !! i = f i.
Proof.
  unfold map_imap; destruct (m !! i = f i) as [y|] eqn:Hi; simpl.
732
  - destruct (m !! i) as [x|] eqn:?; simplify_eq/=.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
733
734
    apply elem_of_map_of_list_1_help.
    { apply elem_of_list_omap; exists (i,x); split;
735
        [by apply elem_of_map_to_list|by simplify_option_eq]. }
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
736
    intros y'; rewrite elem_of_list_omap; intros ([i' x']&Hi'&?).
737
    by rewrite elem_of_map_to_list in Hi'; simplify_option_eq.
738
  - apply not_elem_of_map_of_list; rewrite elem_of_list_fmap.
739
    intros ([i' x]&->&Hi'); simplify_eq/=.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
740
    rewrite elem_of_list_omap in Hi'; destruct Hi' as ([j y]&Hj&?).
741
    rewrite elem_of_map_to_list in Hj; simplify_option_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
Qed.

(** ** Properties of conversion from collections *)
Lemma lookup_map_of_collection {A} `{FinCollection K C}
    (f : K  option A) X i x :
  map_of_collection f X !! i = Some x  i  X  f i = Some x.
Proof.
  assert (NoDup (fst <$> omap (λ i, (i,) <$> f i) (elements X))).
  { induction (NoDup_elements X) as [|i' l]; csimpl; [constructor|].
    destruct (f i') as [x'|]; csimpl; auto; constructor; auto.
    rewrite elem_of_list_fmap. setoid_rewrite elem_of_list_omap.
753
    by intros (?&?&?&?&?); simplify_option_eq. }
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
754
755
  unfold map_of_collection; rewrite <-elem_of_map_of_list by done.
  rewrite elem_of_list_omap. setoid_rewrite elem_of_elements; split.
756
757
  - intros (?&?&?); simplify_option_eq; eauto.
  - intros [??]; exists i; simplify_option_eq; eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
Qed.

(** ** Induction principles *)
Lemma map_ind {A} (P : M A  Prop) :
  P   ( i x m, m !! i = None  P m  P (<[i:=x]>m))   m, P m.
Proof.
  intros ? Hins. cut ( l, NoDup (l.*1)   m, map_to_list m ≡ₚ l  P m).
  { intros help m.
    apply (help (map_to_list m)); auto using NoDup_fst_map_to_list. }
  induction l as [|[i x] l IH]; intros Hnodup m Hml.
  { apply map_to_list_empty_inv_alt in Hml. by subst. }
  inversion_clear Hnodup.
  apply map_to_list_insert_inv in Hml; subst m. apply Hins.
771
772
  - by apply not_elem_of_map_of_list_1.
  - apply IH; auto using map_to_of_list.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
Qed.
Lemma map_to_list_length {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2  length (map_to_list m1) < length (map_to_list m2).
Proof.
  revert m2. induction m1 as [|i x m ? IH] using map_ind.
  { intros m2 Hm2. rewrite map_to_list_empty. simpl.
    apply neq_0_lt. intros Hlen. symmetry in Hlen.
    apply nil_length_inv, map_to_list_empty_inv in Hlen.
    rewrite Hlen in Hm2. destruct (irreflexivity ()  Hm2). }
  intros m2 Hm2.
  destruct (insert_subset_inv m m2 i x) as (m2'&?&?&?); auto; subst.
  rewrite !map_to_list_insert; simpl; auto with arith.
Qed.
Lemma map_wf {A} : wf (strict (@subseteq (M A) _)).
Proof.
  apply (wf_projected (<) (length  map_to_list)).
789
790
  - by apply map_to_list_length.
  - by apply lt_wf.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [map_Forall] predicate *)
Section map_Forall.
Context {A} (P : K  A  Prop).

Lemma map_Forall_to_list m : map_Forall P m  Forall (curry P) (map_to_list m).
Proof.
  rewrite Forall_forall. split.
800
801
  - intros Hforall [i x]. rewrite elem_of_map_to_list. by apply (Hforall i x).
  - intros Hforall i x. rewrite <-elem_of_map_to_list. by apply (Hforall (i,x)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_empty : map_Forall P .
Proof. intros i x. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_impl (Q : K  A  Prop) m :
  map_Forall P m  ( i x, P i x  Q i x)  map_Forall Q m.
Proof. unfold map_Forall; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_insert_11 m i x : map_Forall P (<[i:=x]>m)  P i x.
Proof. intros Hm. by apply Hm; rewrite lookup_insert. Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_insert_12 m i x :
  m !! i = None  map_Forall P (<[i:=x]>m)  map_Forall P m.
Proof.
  intros ? Hm j y ?; apply Hm. by rewrite lookup_insert_ne by congruence.
Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_insert_2 m i x :
  P i x  map_Forall P m  map_Forall P (<[i:=x]>m).
Proof. intros ?? j y; rewrite lookup_insert_Some; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_insert m i x :
  m !! i = None  map_Forall P (<[i:=x]>m)  P i x  map_Forall P m.
Proof.
  naive_solver eauto using map_Forall_insert_11,
    map_Forall_insert_12, map_Forall_insert_2.
Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_ind (Q : M A  Prop) :
  Q  
  ( m i x, m !! i = None  P i x  map_Forall P m  Q m  Q (<[i:=x]>m)) 
   m, map_Forall P m  Q m.
Proof.
  intros Hnil Hinsert m. induction m using map_ind; auto.
  rewrite map_Forall_insert by done; intros [??]; eauto.
Qed.

Context `{ i x, Decision (P i x)}.
Global Instance map_Forall_dec m : Decision (map_Forall P m).
Proof.
  refine (cast_if (decide (Forall (curry P) (map_to_list m))));
    by rewrite map_Forall_to_list.
Defined.
Lemma map_not_Forall (m : M A) :
  ¬map_Forall P m   i x, m !! i = Some x  ¬P i x.
Proof.
  split; [|intros (i&x&?&?) Hm; specialize (Hm i x); tauto].
  rewrite map_Forall_to_list. intros Hm.
  apply (not_Forall_Exists _), Exists_exists in Hm.
845
  destruct Hm as ([i x]&?&?). exists i, x. by rewrite <-elem_of_map_to_list.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
846
847
848
849
850
Qed.
End map_Forall.

(** ** Properties of the [merge] operation *)
Section merge.
851
Context {A} (f : option A  option A  option A) `{!DiagNone f}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
Global Instance: LeftId (=) None f  LeftId (=)  (merge f).
Proof.
  intros ??. apply map_eq. intros.
  by rewrite !(lookup_merge f), lookup_empty, (left_id_L None f).
Qed.
Global Instance: RightId (=) None f  RightId (=)  (merge f).
Proof.
  intros ??. apply map_eq. intros.
  by rewrite !(lookup_merge f), lookup_empty, (right_id_L None f).
Qed.
862
Lemma merge_comm m1 m2 :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
863
864
865
  ( i, f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i) = f (m2 !! i) (m1 !! i)) 
  merge f m1 m2 = merge f m2 m1.
Proof. intros. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite !(lookup_merge f). Qed.
866
867
Global Instance merge_comm' : Comm (=) f  Comm (=) (merge f).
Proof. intros ???. apply merge_comm. intros. by apply (comm f). Qed.
868
Lemma merge_assoc m1 m2 m3 :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
869
870
871
872
  ( i, f (m1 !! i) (f (m2 !! i) (m3 !! i)) =
        f (f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)) (m3 !! i)) 
  merge f m1 (merge f m2 m3) = merge f (merge f m1 m2) m3.
Proof. intros. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite !(lookup_merge f). Qed.
873
874
Global Instance merge_assoc' : Assoc (=) f  Assoc (=) (merge f).
Proof. intros ????. apply merge_assoc. intros. by apply (assoc_L f). Qed.
875
Lemma merge_idemp m1 :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
876
877
  ( i, f (m1 !! i) (m1 !! i) = m1 !! i)  merge f m1 m1 = m1.
Proof. intros. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite !(lookup_merge f). Qed.
878
Global Instance merge_idemp' : IdemP (=) f  IdemP (=) (merge f).
879
Proof. intros ??. apply merge_idemp. intros. by apply (idemp f). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
880
881
882
End merge.

Section more_merge.
883
884
Context {A B C} (f : option A  option B  option C) `{!DiagNone f}.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
Lemma merge_Some m1 m2 m :
  ( i, m !! i = f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i))  merge f m1 m2 = m.
Proof.
  split; [|intros <-; apply (lookup_merge _) ].
  intros Hlookup. apply map_eq; intros. rewrite Hlookup. apply (lookup_merge _).
Qed.
Lemma merge_empty : merge f   = .
Proof. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite !(lookup_merge f), !lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_merge g g1 g2 m1 m2 i :
  g (f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)) = f (g1 (m1 !! i)) (g2 (m2 !! i)) 
  partial_alter g i (merge f m1 m2) =
    merge f (partial_alter g1 i m1) (partial_alter g2 i m2).
Proof.
  intro. apply map_eq. intros j. destruct (decide (i = j)); subst.
899
900
  - by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter, !(lookup_merge _).
  - by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter_ne, (lookup_merge _).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
901
902
903
904
905
906
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_merge_l g g1 m1 m2 i :
  g (f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)) = f (g1 (m1 !! i)) (m2 !! i) 
  partial_alter g i (merge f m1 m2) = merge f (partial_alter g1 i m1) m2.
Proof.
  intro. apply map_eq. intros j. destruct (decide (i = j)); subst.
907
908
  - by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter, !(lookup_merge _).
  - by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter_ne, (lookup_merge _).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
909
910
911
912
913
914
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_merge_r g g2 m1 m2 i :
  g (f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)) = f (m1 !! i) (g2 (m2 !! i)) 
  partial_alter g i (merge f m1 m2) = merge f m1 (partial_alter g2 i m2).
Proof.
  intro. apply map_eq. intros j. destruct (decide (i = j)); subst.
915
916
  - by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter, !(lookup_merge _).
  - by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter_ne, (lookup_merge _).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
917
918
919
920
921
922
Qed.
Lemma insert_merge m1 m2 i x y z :
  f (Some y) (Some z) = Some x 
  <[i:=x]>(merge f m1 m2) = merge f (<[i:=y]>m1) (<[i:=z]>m2).
Proof. by intros; apply partial_alter_merge. Qed.
Lemma merge_singleton i x y z :
923
  f (Some y) (Some z) = Some x  merge f {[i := y]} {[i := z]} = {[i := x]}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
924
Proof.
925
  intros. by erewrite <-!insert_empty, <-insert_merge, merge_empty by eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
Qed.
Lemma insert_merge_l m1 m2 i x y :
  f (Some y) (m2 !! i) = Some x 
  <[i:=x]>(merge f m1 m2) = merge f (<[i:=y]>m1) m2.
Proof. by intros; apply partial_alter_merge_l. Qed.
Lemma insert_merge_r m1 m2 i x z :
  f (m1 !! i) (Some z) = Some x 
  <[i:=x]>(merge f m1 m2) = merge f m1 (<[i:=z]>m2).
Proof. by intros; apply partial_alter_merge_r. Qed.
End more_merge.

(** ** Properties on the [map_relation] relation *)
Section Forall2.
Context {A B} (R : A  B  Prop) (P : A  Prop) (Q : B  Prop).
Context `{ x y, Decision (R x y),  x, Decision (P x),  y, Decision (Q y)}.

Let f (mx : option A) (my : option B) : option bool :=
  match mx, my with
  | Some x, Some y => Some (bool_decide (R x y))
  | Some x, None => Some (bool_decide (P x))
  | None, Some y => Some (bool_decide (Q y))
  | None, None => None
  end.
Lemma map_relation_alt (m1 : M A) (m2 : M B) :
  map_relation R P Q m1 m2  map_Forall (λ _, Is_true) (merge f m1 m2).
Proof.
  split.
953
  - intros Hm i P'; rewrite lookup_merge by done; intros.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
954
    specialize (Hm i). destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i);
955
      simplify_eq/=; auto using bool_decide_pack.
956
  - intros Hm i. specialize (Hm i). rewrite lookup_merge in Hm by done.
957
    destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); simplify_eq/=; auto;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
      by eapply bool_decide_unpack, Hm.
Qed.
Global Instance map_relation_dec `{ x y, Decision (R x y),  x, Decision (P x),
   y, Decision (Q y)} m1 m2 : Decision (map_relation R P Q m1 m2).
Proof.
  refine (cast_if (decide (map_Forall (λ _, Is_true) (merge f m1 m2))));
    abstract by rewrite map_relation_alt.
Defined.
(** Due to the finiteness of finite maps, we can extract a witness if the
relation does not hold. *)
Lemma map_not_Forall2 (m1 : M A) (m2 : M B) :
  ¬map_relation R P Q m1 m2   i,
    ( x y, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some y  ¬R x y)
     ( x, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = None  ¬P x)
     ( y, m1 !! i = None  m2 !! i = Some y  ¬Q y).
Proof.
  split.
975
  - rewrite map_relation_alt, (map_not_Forall _). intros (i&?&Hm&?); exists i.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
976
977
    rewrite lookup_merge in Hm by done.
    destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); naive_solver auto 2 using bool_decide_pack.
978
  - unfold map_relation, option_relation.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
979
    by intros [i[(x&y&?&?&?)|[(x&?&?&?)|(y&?&?&?)]]] Hm;
980
      specialize (Hm i); simplify_option_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
Qed.
End Forall2.

(** ** Properties on the disjoint maps *)
Lemma map_disjoint_spec {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1 ⊥ₘ m2   i x y, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some y  False.
Proof.
  split; intros Hm i; specialize (Hm i);
    destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); naive_solver.
Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_alt {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1 ⊥ₘ m2   i, m1 !! i = None  m2 !! i = None.
Proof.
  split; intros Hm1m2 i; specialize (Hm1m2 i);
    destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); naive_solver.
Qed.
Lemma map_not_disjoint {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  ¬m1 ⊥ₘ m2   i x1 x2, m1 !! i = Some x1  m2 !! i = Some x2.
Proof.
  unfold disjoint, map_disjoint. rewrite map_not_Forall2 by solve_decision.
  split; [|naive_solver].
  intros [i[(x&y&?&?&?)|[(x&?&?&[])|(y&?&?&[])]]]; naive_solver.
Qed.
1004
Global Instance map_disjoint_sym : Symmetric (map_disjoint : relation (M A)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
Proof. intros A m1 m2. rewrite !map_disjoint_spec. naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_empty_l {A} (m : M A) :  ⊥ₘ m.
Proof. rewrite !map_disjoint_spec. intros i x y. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_empty_r {A} (m : M A) : m ⊥ₘ .
Proof. rewrite !map_disjoint_spec. intros i x y. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_weaken {A} (m1 m1' m2 m2' : M A) :
  m1' ⊥ₘ m2'  m1  m1'  m2  m2'  m1 ⊥ₘ m2.
Proof. rewrite !map_subseteq_spec, !map_disjoint_spec. eauto. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_weaken_l {A} (m1 m1' m2  : M A) :
  m1' ⊥ₘ m2  m1  m1'  m1 ⊥ₘ m2.
Proof. eauto using map_disjoint_weaken. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_weaken_r {A} (m1 m2 m2' : M A) :
  m1 ⊥ₘ m2'  m2  m2'  m1 ⊥ₘ m2.
Proof. eauto using map_disjoint_weaken. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_Some_l {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x:
  m1 ⊥ₘ m2  m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = None.
Proof. rewrite map_disjoint_spec, eq_None_not_Some. intros ?? [??]; eauto. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_Some_r {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x:
  m1 ⊥ₘ m2  m2 !! i = Some x  m1 !! i = None.
Proof. rewrite (symmetry_iff map_disjoint). apply map_disjoint_Some_l. Qed.
1025
Lemma map_disjoint_singleton_l {A} (m: M A) i x : {[i:=x]} ⊥ₘ m  m !! i = None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1026
1027
Proof.
  split; [|rewrite !map_disjoint_spec].
1028
  - intro. apply (map_disjoint_Some_l {[i := x]} _ _ x);
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1029
      auto using lookup_singleton.
1030
  - intros ? j y1 y2. destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1031
1032
1033
1034
    + rewrite lookup_singleton. intuition congruence.
    + by rewrite lookup_singleton_ne.
Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_singleton_r {A} (m : M A) i x :
1035
  m ⊥ₘ {[i := x]}  m !! i = None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1036
1037
Proof. by rewrite (symmetry_iff map_disjoint), map_disjoint_singleton_l. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_singleton_l_2 {A} (m : M A) i x :
1038
  m !! i = None  {[i := x]} ⊥ₘ m.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1039
1040
Proof. by rewrite map_disjoint_singleton_l. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_singleton_r_2 {A} (m : M A) i x :
1041
  m !! i = None  m ⊥ₘ {[i := x]}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
Proof. by rewrite map_disjoint_singleton_r. Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_delete_l {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i : m1 ⊥ₘ m2  delete i m1 ⊥ₘ m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_disjoint_alt. intros Hdisjoint j. destruct (Hdisjoint j); auto.
  rewrite lookup_delete_None. tauto.
Qed.
Lemma map_disjoint_delete_r {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i : m1 ⊥ₘ m2  m1 ⊥ₘ delete i m2.
Proof. symmetry. by apply map_disjoint_delete_l. Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [union_with] operation *)
Section union_with.
Context {A} (f : A  A  option A).

Lemma lookup_union_with m1 m2 i :
  union_with f m1 m2 !! i = union_with f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i).
Proof. by rewrite <-(lookup_merge _). Qed.
Lemma lookup_union_with_Some m1 m2 i z :
  union_with f m1 m2 !! i = Some z 
    (m1 !! i = Some z  m2 !! i = None) 
    (m1 !! i = None  m2 !! i = Some z) 
    ( x y, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some y  f x y = Some z).
Proof.
  rewrite lookup_union_with.
  destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); compute; naive_solver.
Qed.
Global Instance: LeftId (@eq (M A))  (union_with f).
Proof. unfold union_with, map_union_with. apply _. Qed.
Global Instance: RightId (@eq (M A))  (union_with f).
Proof. unfold union_with, map_union_with. apply _. Qed.
1071
Lemma union_with_comm m1 m2 :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1072
1073
1074
  ( i x y, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some y  f x y = f y x) 
  union_with f m1 m2 = union_with f m2 m1.
Proof.
1075
  intros. apply (merge_comm _). intros i.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1076
1077
  destruct (m1 !! i) eqn:?, (m2 !! i) eqn:?; simpl; eauto.
Qed.
1078
1079
1080
Global Instance: Comm (=) f  Comm (@eq (M A)) (union_with f).
Proof. intros ???. apply union_with_comm. eauto. Qed.
Lemma union_with_idemp m :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1081
1082
  ( i x, m !! i = Some x  f x x = Some x)  union_with f m m = m.
Proof.
1083
  intros. apply (merge_idemp _). intros i.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
  destruct (m !! i) eqn:?; simpl; eauto.
Qed.
Lemma alter_union_with (g : A  A) m1 m2 i :
  ( x y, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some y  g <$> f x y = f (g x) (g y)) 
  alter g i (union_with f m1 m2) =
    union_with f (alter g i m1) (alter g i m2).
Proof.
  intros. apply (partial_alter_merge _).
  destruct (m1 !! i) eqn:?, (m2 !! i) eqn:?; simpl; eauto.
Qed.
Lemma alter_union_with_l (g : A  A) m1 m2 i :
  ( x y, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some y  g <$> f x y = f (g x) y) 
  ( y, m1 !! i = None  m2 !! i = Some y  g y = y) 
  alter g i (union_with f m1 m2) = union_with f (alter g i m1) m2.
Proof.
  intros. apply (partial_alter_merge_l _).
1100
  destruct (m1 !! i) eqn:?, (m2 !! i) eqn:?; f_equal/=; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
Qed.
Lemma alter_union_with_r (g : A  A) m1 m2 i :
  ( x y, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some y  g <$> f x y = f x (g y)) 
  ( x, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = None  g x = x) 
  alter g i (union_with f m1 m2) = union_with f m1 (alter g i m2).
Proof.
  intros. apply (partial_alter_merge_r _).
1108
  destruct (m1 !! i) eqn:?, (m2 !! i) eqn:?; f_equal/=; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
Qed.
Lemma delete_union_with m1 m2 i :
  delete i (union_with f m1 m2) = union_with f (delete i m1) (delete i m2).
Proof. by apply (partial_alter_merge _). Qed.
Lemma foldr_delete_union_with (m1 m2 : M A) is :
  foldr delete (union_with f m1 m2) is =
    union_with f (foldr delete m1 is) (foldr delete m2 is).
Proof. induction is; simpl. done. by rewrite IHis, delete_union_with. Qed.
Lemma insert_union_with m1 m2 i x y z :
  f x y = Some z 
  <[i:=z]>(union_with f m1 m2) = union_with f (<[i:=x]>m1) (<[i:=y]>m2).
Proof. by intros; apply (partial_alter_merge _). Qed.
Lemma insert_union_with_l m1 m2 i x :
  m2 !! i = None  <[i:=x]>(union_with f m1 m2) = union_with f (<[i:=x]>m1) m2.
Proof.
  intros Hm2. unfold union_with, map_union_with.
  by erewrite (insert_merge_l _) by (by rewrite Hm2).
Qed.
Lemma insert_union_with_r m1 m2 i x :
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]>(union_with f m1 m2) = union_with f m1 (<[i:=x]>m2).
Proof.
  intros Hm1. unfold union_with, map_union_with.
  by erewrite (insert_merge_r _) by (by rewrite Hm1).
Qed.
End union_with.

(** ** Properties of the [union] operation *)
Global Instance: LeftId (@eq (M A))  () := _.
Global Instance: RightId (@eq (M A))  () := _.
1138
Global Instance: Assoc (@eq (M A)) ().
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1139
1140
Proof.
  intros A m1 m2 m3. unfold union, map_union, union_with, map_union_with.
1141
  apply (merge_assoc _). intros i.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1142
1143
  by destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i), (m3 !! i).
Qed.
1144
1145
Global Instance: IdemP (@eq (M A)) ().
Proof. intros A ?. by apply union_with_idemp. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
Lemma lookup_union_Some_raw {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  (m1  m2) !! i = Some x 
    m1 !! i = Some x  (m1 !! i = None  m2 !! i = Some x).
Proof.
  unfold union, map_union, union_with, map_union_with. rewrite (lookup_merge _).
  destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); compute; intuition congruence.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_union_None {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  (m1  m2) !! i = None  m1 !! i = None  m2 !! i = None.
Proof.
  unfold union, map_union, union_with, map_union_with. rewrite (lookup_merge _).
  destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); compute; intuition congruence.
Qed.
Lemma map_positive_l {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1  m2 =   m1 = .
Proof.
  intros Hm. apply map_empty. intros i. apply (f_equal (!! i)) in Hm.
  rewrite lookup_empty, lookup_union_None in Hm; tauto.
Qed.
Lemma map_positive_l_alt {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1    m1  m2  .
Proof. eauto using map_positive_l. Qed.
Lemma lookup_union_Some {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 ⊥ₘ m2  (m1  m2) !! i = Some x  m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  intros Hdisjoint. rewrite lookup_union_Some_raw.
  intuition eauto using map_disjoint_Some_r.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_union_Some_l {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = Some x  (m1  m2) !! i = Some x.
Proof. intro. rewrite lookup_union_Some_raw; intuition. Qed.
Lemma lookup_union_Some_r {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 ⊥ₘ m2  m2 !! i = Some x  (m1  m2) !! i = Some x.
Proof. intro. rewrite lookup_union_Some; intuition. Qed.
1178
Lemma map_union_comm {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1 ⊥ₘ m2  m1  m2 = m2  m1.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1179
Proof.
1180
  intros Hdisjoint. apply (merge_comm (union_with (λ x _, Some x))).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
  intros i. specialize (Hdisjoint i).
  destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); compute; naive_solver.
Qed.
Lemma map_subseteq_union {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1  m2  m1  m2 = m2.
Proof.
  rewrite map_subseteq_spec.
  intros Hm1m2. apply map_eq. intros i. apply option_eq. intros x.
  rewrite lookup_union_Some_raw. split; [by intuition |].
  intros Hm2. specialize (Hm1m2 i). destruct (m1 !! i) as [y|]; [| by auto].
  rewrite (Hm1m2 y eq_refl) in Hm2. intuition congruence.
Qed.
Lemma map_union_subseteq_l {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1  m1  m2.
Proof.
  rewrite map_subseteq_spec. intros ? i x. rewrite lookup_union_Some_raw. tauto.
Qed.
Lemma map_union_subseteq_r {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1 ⊥ₘ m2  m2  m1  m2.
Proof.
1198
  intros. rewrite map_union_comm by done. by apply map_union_subseteq_l.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1199
1200
Qed.
Lemma map_union_subseteq_l_alt {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) : m1  m2  m1  m2  m3.
1201
Proof. intros. trans m2; auto using map_union_subseteq_l. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1202
1203
Lemma map_union_subseteq_r_alt {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) :
  m2 ⊥ₘ m3  m1  m3  m1  m2  m3.
1204
Proof. intros. trans m3; auto using map_union_subseteq_r. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
Lemma map_union_preserving_l {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) : m1  m2  m3  m1  m3  m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros ???.
  rewrite !lookup_union_Some_raw. naive_solver.
Qed.
Lemma map_union_preserving_r {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) :
  m2 ⊥ₘ m3  m1  m2  m1  m3  m2  m3.
Proof.
1213
  intros. rewrite !(map_union_comm _ m3)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
    by eauto using map_disjoint_weaken_l.
  by apply map_union_preserving_l.
Qed.
Lemma map_union_reflecting_l {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) :
  m3 ⊥ₘ m1  m3 ⊥ₘ m2  m3  m1  m3  m2  m1  m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros Hm31 Hm32 Hm i x ?. specialize (Hm i x).
  rewrite !lookup_union_Some in Hm by done. destruct Hm; auto.
  by rewrite map_disjoint_spec in Hm31; destruct (Hm31 i x x).
Qed.
Lemma map_union_reflecting_r {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) :
  m1 ⊥ₘ m3  m2 ⊥ₘ m3  m1  m3  m2  m3  m1  m2.
Proof.
1227
  intros ??. rewrite !(map_union_comm _ m3) by done.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
  by apply map_union_reflecting_l.
Qed.
Lemma map_union_cancel_l {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) :
  m1 ⊥ₘ m3  m2 ⊥ₘ m3  m3  m1 = m3  m2  m1 = m2.
Proof.
1233
  intros. apply (anti_symm ());
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
    apply map_union_reflecting_l with m3; auto using (reflexive_eq (R:=())).
Qed.
Lemma map_union_cancel_r {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) :
  m1 ⊥ₘ m3  m2 ⊥ₘ m3  m1  m3 = m2  m3  m1 = m2.
Proof.