- 20 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 19 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 18 Feb, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This avoids ambiguity with P and Q that we were using before for both uPreds/iProps and indexed uPreds/iProps.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 16 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 15 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 13 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Also, make our redefinition of done more robust under different orders of Importing modules.
-
- 12 Feb, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
The rationale is that, just like the always lemmas about uPred and the frame-preserving updates for maps and iprdos, the versions with the ' are the "more specific" versions, hard-coding more assumptions in the shape of their conclusion.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 11 Feb, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Also do some minor clean up.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 10 Feb, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Now notations are pretty printed in the same way as they are parsed. Before "let x := e1 in e2" was notation for "(fun x => e2) e1", resulting in overlapping notations for the same thing.
-
- 09 Feb, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
We can use a named representation because we only substitute closed values. This idea is borrowed from Pierce's Software Foundations. The named representation has the following advantages: * Programs are much better readable than those using De Bruijn indexes. * Substitutions on closed terms (where all variables are explicit strings) can be performed by a mere simpl instead of Autosubst's asimpl. The performance of simpl seems better than asimpl. * Syntactic sugar refolds better.
-
Ralf Jung authored
add basic notions of literals, unary operators and binary operators, and use them to define +, -, <=, ...
-
- 08 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
Actual proofs will end up using own and inv, and none of the notions defined in ownership.v
-
- 04 Feb, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 03 Feb, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 02 Feb, 2016 8 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Remarks: * eauto needs more fuel to automatically solve the side-conditions. * ssreflect rewrite works if we do a set (φ ..) first. No idea why.
-
Ralf Jung authored
...unfortunately, that proof actually got longer because some automation no longer works
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-