From 186da990ebce236a402421c6cfce17af37cf1c72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robbert Krebbers <mail@robbertkrebbers.nl> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:32:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Use=20=E2=8A=86=20type=20class=20for=20set-like?= =?UTF-8?q?=20inclusion=20of=20lists.?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This also solves a name clash with the extension order of CMRAs. --- heap_lang/lang.v | 4 ++-- prelude/collections.v | 4 ++-- prelude/fin_maps.v | 8 ++++---- prelude/list.v | 9 ++++----- 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/heap_lang/lang.v b/heap_lang/lang.v index 6a0f8af99..6436b4217 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lang.v +++ b/heap_lang/lang.v @@ -318,11 +318,11 @@ Lemma alloc_fresh e v σ : Proof. by intros; apply AllocS, (not_elem_of_dom (D:=gset _)), is_fresh. Qed. (** Closed expressions *) -Lemma is_closed_weaken X Y e : is_closed X e → X `included` Y → is_closed Y e. +Lemma is_closed_weaken X Y e : is_closed X e → X ⊆ Y → is_closed Y e. Proof. revert X Y; induction e; naive_solver (eauto; set_solver). Qed. Lemma is_closed_weaken_nil X e : is_closed [] e → is_closed X e. -Proof. intros. by apply is_closed_weaken with [], included_nil. Qed. +Proof. intros. by apply is_closed_weaken with [], list_subseteq_nil. Qed. Lemma is_closed_subst X e x es : is_closed X e → x ∉ X → subst x es e = e. Proof. diff --git a/prelude/collections.v b/prelude/collections.v index ef7383d52..39eb6f103 100644 --- a/prelude/collections.v +++ b/prelude/collections.v @@ -711,8 +711,8 @@ Section list_unfold. Qed. Global Instance set_unfold_included l k (P Q : A → Prop) : (∀ x, SetUnfold (x ∈ l) (P x)) → (∀ x, SetUnfold (x ∈ k) (Q x)) → - SetUnfold (l `included` k) (∀ x, P x → Q x). - Proof. by constructor; unfold included; set_unfold. Qed. + SetUnfold (l ⊆ k) (∀ x, P x → Q x). + Proof. by constructor; unfold subseteq, list_subseteq; set_unfold. Qed. End list_unfold. diff --git a/prelude/fin_maps.v b/prelude/fin_maps.v index 2f75f6b98..69c1f1c80 100644 --- a/prelude/fin_maps.v +++ b/prelude/fin_maps.v @@ -1225,14 +1225,14 @@ Qed. Lemma map_union_cancel_l {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) : m1 ⊥ₘ m3 → m2 ⊥ₘ m3 → m3 ∪ m1 = m3 ∪ m2 → m1 = m2. Proof. - intros. apply (anti_symm (⊆)); - apply map_union_reflecting_l with m3; auto using (reflexive_eq (R:=(⊆))). + intros. apply (anti_symm (⊆)); apply map_union_reflecting_l with m3; + auto using (reflexive_eq (R:=@subseteq (M A) _)). Qed. Lemma map_union_cancel_r {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) : m1 ⊥ₘ m3 → m2 ⊥ₘ m3 → m1 ∪ m3 = m2 ∪ m3 → m1 = m2. Proof. - intros. apply (anti_symm (⊆)); - apply map_union_reflecting_r with m3; auto using (reflexive_eq (R:=(⊆))). + intros. apply (anti_symm (⊆)); apply map_union_reflecting_r with m3; + auto using (reflexive_eq (R:=@subseteq (M A) _)). Qed. Lemma map_disjoint_union_l {A} (m1 m2 m3 : M A) : m1 ∪ m2 ⊥ₘ m3 ↔ m1 ⊥ₘ m3 ∧ m2 ⊥ₘ m3. diff --git a/prelude/list.v b/prelude/list.v index c5f4ee34c..b96edfdc9 100644 --- a/prelude/list.v +++ b/prelude/list.v @@ -303,9 +303,8 @@ Inductive Forall3 {A B C} (P : A → B → C → Prop) : | Forall3_cons x y z l k k' : P x y z → Forall3 P l k k' → Forall3 P (x :: l) (y :: k) (z :: k'). -(** Set operations Decisionon lists *) -Definition included {A} (l1 l2 : list A) := ∀ x, x ∈ l1 → x ∈ l2. -Infix "`included`" := included (at level 70) : C_scope. +(** Set operations on lists *) +Instance list_subseteq {A} : SubsetEq (list A) := λ l1 l2, ∀ x, x ∈ l1 → x ∈ l2. Section list_set. Context `{dec : EqDecision A}. @@ -2046,9 +2045,9 @@ Section contains_dec. End contains_dec. (** ** Properties of [included] *) -Global Instance included_preorder : PreOrder (@included A). +Global Instance list_subseteq_po : PreOrder (@subseteq (list A) _). Proof. split; firstorder. Qed. -Lemma included_nil l : [] `included` l. +Lemma list_subseteq_nil l : [] ⊆ l. Proof. intros x. by rewrite elem_of_nil. Qed. (** ** Properties of the [Forall] and [Exists] predicate *) -- GitLab