Expressions.v 7.36 KB
Newer Older
1 2
(**
Formalization of the base expression language for the daisy framework
3
Required in all files, since we will always reason about expressions.
4
 **)
5
Require Import Coq.Reals.Reals Coq.micromega.Psatz Coq.QArith.QArith Coq.QArith.Qreals.
6
Require Export Daisy.Infra.Abbrevs Daisy.Infra.RealSimps.
7 8 9 10 11 12
Set Implicit Arguments.
(**
  Expressions will use binary operators.
  Define them first
**)
Inductive binop : Type := Plus | Sub | Mult | Div.
13

14
Definition binopEqBool (b1:binop) (b2:binop) :=
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
  match b1 with
    Plus => match b2 with Plus => true |_ => false end
  | Sub => match b2 with Sub => true |_ => false end
  | Mult => match b2 with Mult => true |_ => false end
  | Div => match b2 with Div => true |_ => false end
  end.

22 23 24 25
(**
  Next define an evaluation function for binary operators on reals.
  Errors are added on the expression evaluation level later.
 **)
26
Definition evalBinop (o:binop) (v1:R) (v2:R) :=
27 28 29 30 31 32
  match o with
  | Plus => Rplus v1 v2
  | Sub => Rminus v1 v2
  | Mult => Rmult v1 v2
  | Div => Rdiv v1 v2
  end.
33 34 35 36 37 38 39

(**
   Expressions will use unary operators.
   Define them first
 **)
Inductive unop: Type := Neg | Inv.

40
Definition unopEqBool (o1:unop) (o2:unop) :=
41 42 43 44 45 46 47
  match o1 with
  |Neg => match o2 with |Neg => true |_=> false end
  |Inv => match o2 with |Inv => true |_ => false end
  end.

(**
   Define evaluation for unary operators on reals.
48
   Errors are added in the expression evaluation level later.
49
 **)
50
Definition evalUnop (o:unop) (v:R):=
51 52 53 54 55
  match o with
  |Neg => (- v)%R
  |Inv => (/ v)%R
  end .

56
(**
57 58
  Define expressions parametric over some value type V.
  Will ease reasoning about different instantiations later.
59 60 61 62
  Note that we differentiate between wether we use a variable from the environment or a parameter.
  Parameters do not have error bounds in the invariants, so they must be perturbed, but variables from the
  program will be perturbed upon binding, so we do not need to perturb them.
**)
63 64
Inductive exp (V:Type): Type :=
  Var: nat -> exp V
65
| Param: nat -> exp V
66
| Const: V -> exp V
67
| Unop: unop -> exp V -> exp V
68
| Binop: binop -> exp V -> exp V -> exp V.
69

70 71 72 73
(**
  Boolean equality function on expressions.
  Used in certificates to define the analysis result as function
**)
74
Fixpoint expEqBool (e1:exp Q) (e2:exp Q) :=
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
  match e1 with
  |Var _ v1 =>
   match e2 with
   |Var _ v2 => v1 =? v2
   | _=> false
   end
  |Param _ v1 =>
   match e2 with
   |Param _ v2 => v1 =? v2
   | _=> false
   end
  |Const n1 =>
   match e2 with
   |Const n2 => Qeq_bool n1 n2
   | _=> false
   end
91 92
  |Unop o1 e11 =>
   match e2 with
93
   |Unop o2 e22 => andb (unopEqBool o1 o2) (expEqBool e11 e22)
94 95 96
   |_ => false
   end
  |Binop o1 e11 e12 =>
97
   match e2 with
98
   |Binop o2 e21 e22 => andb (binopEqBool o1 o2) (andb (expEqBool e11 e21) (expEqBool e12 e22))
99 100 101
   |_ => false
   end
  end.
102

103 104 105 106
(**
  Define a perturbation function to ease writing of basic definitions
**)
Definition perturb (r:R) (e:R) :=
107
  (r * (1 + e))%R.
Heiko Becker's avatar
Heiko Becker committed
108

109
(**
110 111 112 113 114 115
Define expression evaluation relation parametric by an "error" epsilon.
This value will be used later to express float computations using a perturbation
of the real valued computation by (1 + delta), where |delta| <= machine epsilon.

It is important that variables are not perturbed when loading from an environment.
This is the case, since loading a float value should not increase an additional error.
116
Unary negation is special! We do not have a new error here since IEE 754 gives us a sign bit
117
**)
118 119
Inductive eval_exp (eps:R) (E:env) (P:precond) : (exp R) -> R -> Prop :=
  Var_load x: eval_exp eps E  P (Var R x) (E x)
Heiko Becker's avatar
Heiko Becker committed
120 121
| Param_acc x delta:
    ((Rabs delta) <= eps)%R ->
122
    ((Q2R (fst (P x))) <= perturb (E x) delta <= (Q2R (snd (P x))))%R ->
123
    eval_exp eps E P (Param R x) (perturb (E x) delta)
124 125
| Const_dist n delta:
    Rle (Rabs delta) eps ->
126 127
    eval_exp eps E P (Const n) (perturb n delta)
| Unop_neg f1 v1: eval_exp eps E P f1 v1 -> eval_exp eps E P (Unop Neg f1) (evalUnop Neg v1)
128
| Unop_inv f1 v1 delta:
129
    Rle (Rabs delta) eps ->
130 131
    eval_exp eps E P f1 v1 ->
    eval_exp eps E P (Unop Inv f1) (perturb (evalUnop Inv v1) delta)
132 133
| Binop_dist op f1 f2 v1 v2 delta:
    Rle (Rabs delta) eps ->
134 135 136
                eval_exp eps E P f1 v1 ->
                eval_exp eps E P f2 v2 ->
                eval_exp eps E P (Binop op f1 f2) (perturb (evalBinop op v1 v2) delta).
137

138
(**
139
If |delta| <= 0 then perturb v delta is exactly v.
140
**)
141
Lemma delta_0_deterministic (v:R) (delta:R):
Heiko Becker's avatar
Heiko Becker committed
142 143 144 145 146
  (Rabs delta <= 0)%R ->
  perturb v delta = v.
Proof.
  intros abs_0; apply Rabs_0_impl_eq in abs_0; subst.
  unfold perturb.
147
  lra.
Heiko Becker's avatar
Heiko Becker committed
148 149
Qed.

150
(**
151
Evaluation with 0 as machine epsilon is deterministic
152
**)
153
Lemma meps_0_deterministic (f:exp R) (E:env) (P:precond):
154
  forall v1 v2,
155 156
  eval_exp R0 E P f v1 ->
  eval_exp R0 E P f v2 ->
157 158
  v1 = v2.
Proof.
159 160
  induction f; intros v1 v2 eval_v1 eval_v2;
    inversion eval_v1; inversion eval_v2;
161
      repeat try rewrite delta_0_deterministic; subst; auto.
162
  - rewrite (IHf v0 v3); auto.
163 164
  - inversion H3.
  - inversion H4.
165 166 167
  - rewrite (IHf v0 v3); auto.
  - rewrite (IHf1 v0 v4); auto.
    rewrite (IHf2 v3 v5); auto.
168 169
Qed.

170 171 172 173
(**
Helping lemma. Needed in soundness proof.
For each evaluation of using an arbitrary epsilon, we can replace it by
evaluating the subexpressions and then binding the result values to different
174
variables in the Eironment.
175
This relies on the property that variables are not perturbed as opposed to parameters
176
**)
177 178
Lemma binary_unfolding (b:binop) (f1:exp R) (f2:exp R) (eps:R) (cE:env) (P:precond) (v:R):
  (eval_exp eps cE P (Binop b f1 f2) v <->
179
   exists v1 v2,
180 181 182
     eval_exp eps cE P f1 v1 /\
     eval_exp eps cE P f2 v2 /\
     eval_exp eps (updEnv 2 v2 (updEnv 1 v1 cE)) P (Binop b (Var R 1) (Var R 2)) v).
183 184 185 186 187 188
Proof.
  split.
  - intros eval_bin.
    inversion eval_bin; subst.
    exists v1, v2.
    repeat split; try auto.
189
    constructor; try auto;
190 191
    constructor; auto.
  - intros exists_val.
192 193
    destruct exists_val as [v1 [v2 [eval_f1 [eval_f2 eval_e_E]]]].
    inversion eval_e_E; subst.
194 195 196 197 198
    inversion H4; inversion H5; subst.
    unfold updEnv in *; simpl in *.
    constructor; auto.
Qed.

199 200 201
(**
Analogous lemma for unary expressions.
**)
202 203
Lemma unary_unfolding (e:exp R) (eps:R) (cE:env) (P:precond) (v:R):
  (eval_exp eps cE P (Unop Inv e) v <->
204
   exists v1,
205 206
     eval_exp eps cE P e v1 /\
     eval_exp eps (updEnv 1 v1 cE) P (Unop Inv (Var R 1)) v).
207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215
Proof.
  split.
  - intros eval_un.
    inversion eval_un; subst.
    exists v1.
    repeat split; try auto.
    constructor; try auto.
    constructor; auto.
  - intros exists_val.
216 217
    destruct exists_val as [v1 [eval_f1 eval_e_E]].
    inversion eval_e_E; subst.
218 219 220 221 222
    inversion H1; subst.
    unfold updEnv in *; simpl in *.
    constructor; auto.
Qed.

223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230
(**
  Using the parametric expressions, define boolean expressions for conditionals
**)
Inductive bexp (V:Type) : Type :=
  leq: exp V -> exp V -> bexp V
| less: exp V -> exp V -> bexp V.
(**
  Define evaluation of booleans for reals
231
 **)
232
Inductive bval (eps:R) (E:env) (P:precond): (bexp R) -> Prop -> Prop :=
233
  leq_eval (f1:exp R) (f2:exp R) (v1:R) (v2:R):
234 235 236
    eval_exp eps E P f1 v1 ->
    eval_exp eps E P f2 v2 ->
    bval eps E P (leq f1 f2) (Rle v1 v2)
237
|less_eval (f1:exp R) (f2:exp R) (v1:R) (v2:R):
238 239 240
    eval_exp eps E P f1 v1 ->
    eval_exp eps E P f2 v2 ->
    bval eps E P (less f1 f2) (Rlt v1 v2).
241 242 243
(**
 Simplify arithmetic later by making > >= only abbreviations
**)
244 245
Definition gr := fun (V:Type) (f1: exp V) (f2: exp V) => less f2 f1.
Definition greq := fun (V:Type) (f1:exp V) (f2: exp V) => leq f2 f1.